In Utero Exposure to Smoking and Peripheral Chemoreceptor Function in Preterm Neonates
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the involvement of peripheral chemoreceptor tonic activity in the ventilatory pattern during sleep in preterm neonates exposed in utero to maternal smoking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral chemoreceptor activity was measured at thermoneutrality in neonates (postmenstrual age: 36.1 ± 1.2 weeks) born to nonsmoking (n = 21) or smoking (n = 16) mothers by performing a 30-second hyperoxic test during active and quiet sleep. Blood oxygen saturation, baseline ventilatory parameters, and central apnea were monitored. RESULTS: Prenatal smoking exposure did not modify baseline ventilation. It was interesting to note that prenatal smoking exposure decreased the peripheral chemoreceptor tonic activity during active sleep and increased the response time during quiet sleep. These changes could explain the increase in the time spent in apnea (both with and without blood oxygen desaturation) and in the mean duration of apneic episodes with desaturation found in neonates exposed to smoking in utero. The involvement of a change in the chemoreceptor function is supported by the fact that the peripheral chemoreceptor tonic activity was negatively correlated with the mean duration of apneic episodes with desaturation in the control group only. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to reveal that prenatal smoking exposure does not directly modify baseline ventilatory parameters in the neonate but has a negative impact on peripheral chemoreceptor tonic activity. These alterations may increase the risk of sleep respiratory disorders, especially via apnea with desaturation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tobacco exposure during pregnancy impairs infant cardiorespiratory function.
“Maternal smoking and smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy are associated with increased risk of neonatal apnea, while maternal smoking is also associated with a decreased arousal response.”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [116]
Maternal smoking and smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy are associated with increased neonatal apnea.
“Maternal smoking and smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy are associated with increased risk of neonatal apnea”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [116]
Maternal smoking is associated with a reduced arousal response.
“while maternal smoking is also associated with a decreased arousal response.”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [116]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Smoking and the sudden infant death syndrome
Mitchell, E. A., & Milerad, J. (2006) · Reviews on Environmental Health · doi:10.1515/reveh.2006.21.2.81 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Self-reported nicotine exposure and plasma levels of cotinine in early and late pregnancy
GEORGE, L., GRANATH, F., JOHANSSON, A. L. V., & CNATTINGIUS, S. (2006) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1080/00016340600935433 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Prenatal nicotine exposure blunts the cardiorespiratory response to hypoxia in lambs
Hafström, O., Milerad, J., & Sundell, H. W. (2002) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200204-289oc · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
England, L. J., Aagaard, K., Bloch, M., Conway, K., Cosgrove, K., Grana, R., Gould, T. J., Hatsukami, D., Jensen, F., Kandel, D., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.013 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stéphan-Blanchard, E., Chardon, K., Léké, A., Delanaud, S., Djeddi, D., Libert, J.-P., Bach, V., & Telliez, F.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire PériTox-INERIS (EA 4285–UMI 01), Jules Verne University of Picardy, Amiens, France; and
- Périnatalité & Risques Toxiques (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie (FR)
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e592-e599
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2085331174
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Keywords
- prenatal smoking exposure, maternal smoking, preterm infants, peripheral chemoreceptors, sleep apnea, sleep-disordered breathing, neonatal mechanical ventilation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Apnea, Chemoreceptor Cells, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Mothers, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Respiratory Muscles, Smoking, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review