Cited by 74Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthReproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Association between sexually transmitted diseases and young adults’ self-reported abstinence.

Open access
DiClemente, Ralph J., Sales, Jessica McDermott, Danner, Fred, Crosby, Richard A.·2011·PEDIATRICS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Self-reported behavior has been the cornerstone of sexual health research and clinical practice, yet advances in sexually transmitted disease (STD) screening provide researchers with the opportunity to objectively quantify sexual risk behaviors. However, the extent to which young adults' laboratory-confirmed STD results and self-reported sexual behaviors are consistent has not been assessed in a nationally representative sample. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data are derived from participants who completed wave 3 in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Young adults (N = 14 012) completed an audio computer-assisted self-interviewing survey and provided a urine specimen to detect the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and a polymerase chain reaction assay to detect Trichomonas vaginalis. RESULTS: More than 10% of young adults with a laboratory-confirmed positive STD result reported abstaining from sexual intercourse in the 12 months before assessment and STD testing. After controlling for several sociodemographic factors, self-reported sex (versus those who reported abstinence) in the previous 12 months was significantly associated with testing positive, but the odds of testing positive were only slightly more than twofold (adjusted odds ratio: 2.11 [95% confidence interval: 2.097-2.122]). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate discrepancy between young adults' positive STD status and self-reported sexual behavior. No significant correlates of discrepant reporting were identified. From a clinical standpoint, the discrepancies between STD positivity and self-reported sexual behavior observed in this nationally representative sample suggest that routine STD screening may be beneficial and necessary to reduce STD morbidity among young adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2009-0892

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that opt-out chlamydia screening among adolescent and young adult females might substantially increase screening, be cost-saving, and identify infections among patients who do not disclose sexual behavior.

    “Cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that opt-out chlamydia screening among adolescent and young adult females might substantially increase screening, be cost-saving (172), and identify infections among patients who do not disclose sexual behavior (173).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [173]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiClemente, R. J., Sales, J. M., Danner, F., & Crosby, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2011-02-01
Volume
127
Issue
2
Pages
208-213
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2140576047
Cited by
74
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
17.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Emory University
  • U.S. Public Health Service (P30A1050409)
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington (P30 A1050409)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
sexually transmitted infections, young adults, sexual abstinence, self-reported sexual behavior, chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis, STI screening, sexual risk behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Abstinence, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review