Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Vaccine Safety Datalink: A Model for Monitoring Immunization Safety

Baggs, James, Gee, Julianne, Lewis, Edwin, Fowler, Gabrielle, Benson, Patti, Lieu, Tracy, Naleway, Allison, Klein, Nicola P., Baxter, Roger, Belongia, Edward, Glanz, Jason, Hambidge, Simon J., Jacobsen, Steven J., Jackson, Lisa, Nordin, Jim, Weintraub, Eric·2011·Pediatrics

Abstract

The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) project is a collaborative project between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 8 managed care organizations (MCOs) in the United States. Established in 1990 to conduct postmarketing evaluations of vaccine safety, the project has created an infrastructure that allows for high-quality research and surveillance. The 8 participating MCOs comprise a large population of 8.8 million members annually (3% of the US population), which enables researchers to conduct studies that assess adverse events after immunization. Each MCO prepares computerized data files by using a standardized data dictionary containing demographic and medical information on its members, such as age and gender, health plan enrollment, vaccinations, hospitalizations, outpatient clinic visits, emergency department visits, urgent care visits, and mortality data, as well as additional birth information (eg, birth weight) when available. Other information sources, such as medical chart review, member surveys, and pharmacy, laboratory, and radiology data, are often used in VSD studies to validate outcomes and vaccination data. Since 2000, the VSD has undergone significant changes including an increase in the number of participating MCOs and enrolled population, changes in data-collection procedures, the creation of near real-time data files, and the development of near real-time postmarketing surveillance for newly licensed vaccines or changes in vaccine recommendations. Recognized as an important resource in vaccine safety, the VSD is working toward increasing transparency through data-sharing and external input. With its recent enhancements, the VSD provides scientific expertise, continues to develop innovative approaches for vaccine-safety research, and may serve as a model for other patient safety collaborative research projects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2010-1722h

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Baggs, J., Gee, J., Lewis, E., Fowler, G., Benson, P., Lieu, T., Naleway, A., Klein, N. P., Baxter, R., Belongia, E., Glanz, J., Hambidge, S. J., Jacobsen, S. J., Jackson, L., Nordin, J., & Weintraub, E.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
127
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S45-S53
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2130219862
Cited by
349
References
2
FWCI
53.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Vaccine Safety Datalink: A Model for Monitoring Immunization Safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2010-1722h
The paper
Baggs, J., Gee, J., Lewis, E., Fowler, G., Benson, P., Lieu, T., Naleway, A., Klein, N. P., Baxter, R., Belongia, E., Glanz, J., Hambidge, S. J., Jacobsen, S. J., Jackson, L., Nordin, J., & Weintraub, E. (2011). The Vaccine Safety Datalink: A Model for Monitoring Immunization Safety. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1722h

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.