Cited by 381Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Risk of anaphylaxis after vaccination in children and adults.

Open access
McNeil, Michael M., Weintraub, Eric S., Duffy, Jonathan, Sukumaran, Lakshmi, Jacobsen, Steven J., Klein, Nicola P., Hambidge, Simon J., Lee, Grace M. +6 more·2016·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction. The risk of anaphylaxis after vaccination has not been well described in adults or with newer vaccines in children.Objective We sought to estimate the incidence of anaphylaxis after vaccines and describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of confirmed cases of anaphylaxis.Methods Using health care data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, we determined rates of anaphylaxis after vaccination in children and adults. We first identified all patients with a vaccination record from January 2009 through December 2011 and used diagnostic and procedure codes to identify potential anaphylaxis cases. Medical records of potential cases were reviewed. Confirmed cases met the Brighton Collaboration definition for anaphylaxis and had to be determined to be vaccine triggered. We calculated the incidence of anaphylaxis after all vaccines combined and for selected individual vaccines.Results We identified 33 confirmed vaccine-triggered anaphylaxis cases that occurred after 25,173,965 vaccine doses. The rate of anaphylaxis was 1.31 (95% CI, 0.90-1.84) per million vaccine doses. The incidence did not vary significantly by age, and there was a nonsignificant female predominance. Vaccine-specific rates included 1.35 (95% CI, 0.65-2.47) per million doses for inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (10 cases, 7,434,628 doses given alone) and 1.83 (95% CI, 0.22-6.63) per million doses for inactivated monovalent influenza vaccine (2 cases, 1,090,279 doses given alone). The onset of symptoms among cases was within 30 minutes (8 cases), 30 to less than 120 minutes (8 cases), 2 to less than 4 hours (10 cases), 4 to 8 hours (2 cases), the next day (1 case), and not documented (4 cases).Conclusion Anaphylaxis after vaccination is rare in all age groups. Despite its rarity, anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening medical emergency that vaccine providers need to be prepared to treat.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.07.048

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anaphylaxis is an established rare but life-threatening side effect of vaccines, with a rate of 1.31 (95% CI, 0.90-1.84) per million vaccine doses and no deaths in recent US data.

    “Anaphylaxis is example of an established rare but life threatening side effect of vaccines with the most recent United States data from the vaccine safety data link identifying a rate of anaphylaxis of 1.31 (95% CI, 0.90–1.84) per million vaccine doses and no deaths (McNeil et al., 2016).”

    From Vaccine Safety: Myths and Misinformation (2020) · cites this paper as McNeil et al., 2016

  • Anaphylaxis rates after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are about two- to fourfold more than is typically seen with more traditional vaccines.

    “which is about two- to fourfold more than is typically seen with more traditional vaccines214.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNeil, M. M., Weintraub, E. S., Duffy, J., Sukumaran, L., Jacobsen, S. J., Klein, N. P., Hambidge, S. J., Lee, G. M., Jackson, L. A., Irving, S. A., King, J. P., Kharbanda, E. O., Bednarczyk, R. A., & DeStefano, F.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation (US)
  • HealthPartners (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
McNeil, Michael M.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
137
Issue
3
Pages
868-878
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1918065319
Cited by
381
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
17.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI074492)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
vaccine anaphylaxis, vaccine safety, inactivated influenza vaccine, trivalent influenza vaccine, monovalent influenza vaccine, children, adults, symptom onset timing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anaphylaxis, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk, Vaccination, Vaccines, Incidence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review