Cited by 197Doping in SportsEating Disorders and BehaviorsPharmacological Effects and Assays

Muscle-enhancing behaviors among adolescent girls and boys

Open access
Eisenberg, Marla E., Wall, Melanie, Neumark-Sztainer, Dianne·2012·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Media images of men and women have become increasingly muscular, and muscle-enhancing techniques are available to youth. Identifying populations at risk for unhealthy muscle-enhancingbehaviors is of considerable public health importance. The current study uses a large and diverse population-based sample of adolescents to examine the prevalence of muscle-enhancing behaviors and differences across demographic characteristics, weight status, and sports team involvement. METHODS: Survey data from 2793 diverse adolescents (mean age = 14.4) were collected at 20 urban middle and high schools. Use of 5 muscle-enhancing behaviors was assessed (changing eating, exercising, protein powders, steroids and other muscle-enhancing substances), and a summary score reflecting use of 3 or more behaviors was created. Logistic regression was used to test for differences in each behavior across age group, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, BMI category, and sports team participation. RESULTS: Muscle-enhancing behaviors were common in this sample for both boys and girls. For example, 34.7% used protein powders or shakes and 5.9% reported steroid use. Most behaviors were significantly more common among boys. In models mutually adjusted for all covariates, grade level, Asian race, BMI category, and sports team participation were significantly associated with the use of muscle-enhancing behaviors. For example, overweight (odds ratio = 1.45) and obese (odds ratio = 1.90) girls had significantly greater odds of using protein powders or shakes than girls of average BMI. CONCLUSIONS: The use of muscle-enhancing behaviors is substantially higher than has been previously reported and is cause for concern. Pediatricians and other health care providers should ask their adolescent patients about muscle-enhancing behaviors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2012-0095

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Muscularity-oriented disordered eating behaviors are relatively common among both adolescent boys and girls.

    “Clinicians working with adolescent girls should assess for muscularity-oriented disordered eating behaviors, which are relatively common among both adolescent boys and girls (Eisenberg et al., 2012).”

    From Incorporating social media and muscular ideal internalization into the tripartite influence model of body image: Towards a modern understanding of adolescent girls’ body dissatisfaction (2022) · cites this paper as Eisenberg et al., 2012

    The Results report that changing eating to increase muscle size or tone was common among both boys and girls, and the Conclusions recommend that clinicians ask adolescents about muscle-enhancing behaviors. The paper does not establish that these common behaviors were disordered eating: its Conclusions say that changing eating or exercising may be beneficial, while compulsive or excessive use is cause for concern. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 197

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Leit RA, Pope HG Jr, Gray JJ. Cultural expectations of muscularity in men: the evolution of playgirl centerfolds. Int J Eat Disord. 2001;29(1):90-93
  2. Pope HG Jr, Olivardia R, Gruber A, Borowiecki J. Evolving ideals of male body image as seen through action toys. Int J Eat Disord. 1999;26(1):65-72
  3. Pope HG Jr, Olivardia R, Borowiecki JJ III, Cohane GH. The growing commercial value of the male body: a longitudinal survey of advertising in women's magazines. Psychother Psychosom. 2001;70(4):189- 192
  4. Neumark-Sztainer D, Wall M, Larson N, Story M, Fulkerson JA, Eisenberg ME. Sec- ular trends in weight status and weight- related attitudes and behaviors in adoles- cents from 1999-2010. Prev Med. 2012;54 (1):77-81
  5. Leit RA, Gray JJ, Pope HG Jr. The media' s representation of the ideal male body: a cause for muscle dysmorphia? Int J Eat Disord. 2002;31(3):334-338
  6. Andrist LC. Media images, body dissatis- faction, and disordered eating in adoles- cent women. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003;28(2):119-123
  7. Hogan MJ, Strasburger VC. Body image, eating disorders, and the media. Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2008;19(3):521-546, x-xi
  8. Grogan S. Body Image: Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Men, Women, and Chil- dren. 2nd ed. London, England: Routledge; 2008
  9. Gruber AJ. A more muscular female body ideal. In: Thompson JK, Cafri G, eds. The Muscular Ideal Psychological, Social, and Medical Perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2007: 217-234
  10. Homan K. Athletic-ideal and thin-ideal in- ternalization as prospective predictors of body dissatisfaction, dieting, and compul- sive exercise. Body Image. 2010;7(3):240- 245
  11. Associated Press. Barry Bonds indicted. November 15, 2007. Available at: www. sfgate.com/flat/archive/2007/11/15/news/ archive/2007/11/15/state/n141013S18.html. Accessed October 5, 2011
  12. Metzl JD, Small E, Levine SR, Gershel JC. Creatine use among young athletes. Pedi- atrics. 2001;108(2):421-425
  13. vandenBerg P, Neumark-Sztainer D, Cafri G, Wall M. Steroid use among adolescents: longitudinal findings from Project EAT. Pe- diatrics. 2007;119(3):476-486
  14. Irving LM, Wall M, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M. Steroid use among adolescents: findings from Project EAT. J Adolesc Health. 2002;30(4):243-252
  15. Vertalino M, Eisenberg ME, Story M, Neumark- Sztainer D. Participation in weight-related sports is associated with higher use of unhealthful weight-control behaviors and steroid use. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(3): 434-440
  16. McCabe MP, Ricciardelli LA. Body image and body change techniques among young ad- olescent boys. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2001;9 (5):335-347
  17. McCabe MP, Ricciardelli LA. Parent, peer, and media influences on body image and strategies to both increase and decrease body size among adolescent boys and girls. Adolescence. 2001;36(142):225-240
  18. Smolak L, Murnen SK, Thompson JK. So- ciocultural influences and muscle building in adolescent boys. Psychol Men Masc. 2005;6(4):227-239
  19. Fernandez MMF, Hosey RG. Performance- enhancing drugs snare nonathletes, too. J Fam Pract. 2009;58(1):16-23
  20. Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Hannan PJ, Croll J. Overweight status and eating pat- terns among adolescents: where do youths stand in comparison with the healthy people 2010 objectives? Am J Public Health. 2002;92(5):844-851
  21. Stice E. Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2002;128(5):825-848
  22. Stice E, Whitenton K. Risk factors for body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls: a longi- tudinal investigation. Dev Psychol. 2002;38 (5):669-678
  23. Cafri G, Thompson JK, Ricciardelli L, McCabe M, Smolak L, Yesalis C. Pursuit of the muscular ideal: Physical and psycho- logical consequences and putative risk factors. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25(2):215- 239
  24. Boutelle K, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Resnick M. Weight control behaviors among obese, overweight, and nonover- weight adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002;27(6):531-540
  25. Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Hannan PJ, Perry CL, Irving LM. Weight-related con- cerns and behaviors among overweight and nonoverweight adolescents: implica- tions for preventing weight-related dis- orders. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156 (2):171-178

Authors
Eisenberg, M. E., Wall, M., & Neumark-Sztainer, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and
Corresponding author
Wall, Melanie
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2012-12-01
Volume
130
Issue
6
Pages
1019-1026
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2108041501
Cited by
197
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
34.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL084064)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
adolescents, anabolic steroids, protein powder, weight status, obesity, overweight, sex differences, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, dietary habits, physical activity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Body Image, Dietary Proteins, Drug Utilization, Feeding Behavior, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Minnesota, Obesity, Powders, Socialization, Somatotypes, Steroids, Health Behavior, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements, Overweight, Muscle Strength, Performance-Enhancing Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review