Cited by 29Obesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health PracticesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Obesity disparities among elementary-aged children: data from school-based BMI surveillance.

Bailey-Davis, Lisa, Horst, Michael, Hillemeier, Marianne M., Lauter, Alison·2012·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine 3-year trends and spatial clustering in the prevalence of obesity among elementary-aged children in Pennsylvania. METHODS: Height and weight were measured for ∼980 000 children between ages 5 and 12 years, corresponding to kindergarten through grade 6 in 3 consecutive school years (2006–2007, 2007–2008, 2008–2009). These data were obtained at the school district level and reported to the Pennsylvania Department of Health in response to a state mandate requiring public schools to conduct annual surveillance of student growth. Analyses at the school district level (n = 501) regarding obesity prevalence (BMI ≥ 95th percentile) according to age and gender were conducted to examine associations over time and in relation to population density, geographic boundaries, and a calculated family distress index. RESULTS: The mean prevalence of obesity remained stable over 3 years at ∼17.6% of elementary-aged children. However, within the state, significant differences in the prevalence of obesity were identified. Schools in the most rural areas had adjusted obesity prevalence over 2 percentage points higher than urban schools. Consistent with secular findings for the nation in general, students with families living in socioeconomic distress exhibited upward trends in obesity risk. CONCLUSIONS: School-based surveillance elucidates the disparate risk of obesity for younger students living in the most rural areas, a key finding for primarily rural states. Preventive interventions are needed to reach the most rural children with an emphasis on families where parents are single, are unemployed, have a lower income, and lower educational attainment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2012-0192

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bailey-Davis, L., Horst, M., Hillemeier, M. M., & Lauter, A.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Lancaster General Hospital (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2012-12-01
Volume
130
Issue
6
Pages
1102-1109
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2139648571
Cited by
29
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
childhood obesity, obesity disparities, elementary school students, urban-rural differences, socioeconomic distress, obesity prevalence trends, spatial clustering, Pennsylvania
MeSH terms
Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Obesity, Pennsylvania, Population Surveillance, Poverty, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Statistics as Topic, Urban Population, Body Mass Index, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review