Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 802

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of Neonates With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis

Polin, Richard A., the COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, Papile, Lu-Ann, Baley, Jill E., Bhutani, Vinod K., Carlo, Waldemar A., Cummings, James, Kumar, Praveen, Tan, Rosemarie C., Wang, Kasper S., Watterberg, Kristi L.·2012·Pediatrics

Abstract

With improved obstetrical management and evidence-based use of intrapartum antimicrobial therapy, early-onset neonatal sepsis is becoming less frequent. However, early-onset sepsis remains one of the most common causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality in the preterm population. The identification of neonates at risk for early-onset sepsis is frequently based on a constellation of perinatal risk factors that are neither sensitive nor specific. Furthermore, diagnostic tests for neonatal sepsis have a poor positive predictive accuracy. As a result, clinicians often treat well-appearing infants for extended periods of time, even when bacterial cultures are negative. The optimal treatment of infants with suspected early-onset sepsis is broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents (ampicillin and an aminoglycoside). Once a pathogen is identified, antimicrobial therapy should be narrowed (unless synergism is needed). Recent data suggest an association between prolonged empirical treatment of preterm infants (≥5 days) with broad-spectrum antibiotics and higher risks of late onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and mortality. To reduce these risks, antimicrobial therapy should be discontinued at 48 hours in clinical situations in which the probability of sepsis is low. The purpose of this clinical report is to provide a practical and, when possible, evidence-based approach to the management of infants with suspected or proven early-onset sepsis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2012-0541

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 802

Metadata

Authors
Polin, R. A., the COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, Papile, L.-A., Baley, J. E., Bhutani, V. K., Carlo, W. A., Cummings, J., Kumar, P., Tan, R. C., Wang, K. S., & Watterberg, K. L.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2012-05-01
Volume
129
Issue
5
Pages
1006-1015
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2167696296
Cited by
802
References
61
FWCI
38.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of Neonates With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2012-0541
The paper
Polin, R. A., the COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, Papile, L.-A., Baley, J. E., Bhutani, V. K., Carlo, W. A., Cummings, J., Kumar, P., Tan, R. C., Wang, K. S., & Watterberg, K. L. (2012). Management of Neonates With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0541

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.