The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Duration and Course of Post-Concussive Symptoms
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the incidence, duration, and clinical course of individual post-concussive symptoms in patients presenting to a pediatric emergency department (ED) with a concussion. METHODS: We conducted secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients 11 to 22 years old presenting to the ED of a children’s hospital with an acute concussion. The main outcome measure was duration of symptoms, assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPSQ). Patients initially completed a questionnaire describing mechanism of injury, associated symptoms, past medical history, and the RPSQ, then were serially administered the RPSQ for 3 months after the concussion or until all symptoms resolved. RESULTS: Headache, fatigue, dizziness, and taking longer to think were the most common symptoms encountered at presentation, whereas sleep disturbance, frustration, forgetfulness, and fatigue were the symptoms most likely to develop during the follow-up period that had not initially been present. Median duration of symptoms was the longest for irritability (16 days), sleep disturbance (16 days), frustration (14 days), and poor concentration (14 days), whereas nausea, depression, dizziness, and double-vision abated most quickly. One month after injury, nearly a quarter of children still complained of headache, >20% suffered from fatigue, and nearly 20% reported taking longer to think. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients presenting to a pediatric ED after a concussion, physical symptoms such as headache predominate immediately after the injury, emotional symptoms tend to develop later in the recovery period, and cognitive symptoms may be present throughout.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · Cited by 51,384
King, N. S., Crawford, S., Wenden, F. J., Moss, N. E. G., & Wade, D. T. (1995) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/bf00868811 · Cited by 1,460
Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire
Eyres, S., Carey, A., Gilworth, G., Neumann, V., & Tennant, A. (2005) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/0269215505cr905oa · Cited by 335
Ropper, A. H., & Gorson, K. C. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp064645 · Cited by 215
Cited by
Natural Progression of Symptom Change and Recovery From Concussion in a Pediatric Population
Ledoux, A.-A., Tang, K., Yeates, K. O., Pusic, M. V., Boutis, K., Craig, W. R., Gravel, J., Freedman, S. B., Gagnon, I., Gioia, G. A., et al. (2019) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3820 · Cited by 188
Lambert, M., Sheldrake, E., Deneault, A.-A., Wheeler, A., Burke, M., & Scratch, S. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48453 · Cited by 51
Djukic, S., Phillips, N. L., & Lah, S. (2022) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2022.2140198 · Cited by 26
Botchway, E. N., Godfrey, C., Anderson, V., Nicholas, C. L., & Catroppa, C. (2019) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2018.5743 · Cited by 19
Botchway, E. N., Godfrey, C., Ryan, N. P., Hearps, S., Nicholas, C. L., Anderson, V. A., & Catroppa, C. (2020) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2020.1832704 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Eisenberg, M. A., Meehan, W. P., & Mannix, R.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2014-06-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 999-1006
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2152215342
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.