Cited by 248Epilepsy research and treatmentIon channel regulation and functionGenomics and Rare Diseases

Incidence of Dravet Syndrome in a US Population

Open access
Wu, Yvonne W., Sullivan, Joseph, McDaniel, Sharon S., Meisler, Miriam H., Walsh, Eileen M., Li, Sherian Xu, Kuzniewicz, Michael W.·2015·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: De novo mutations of the gene sodium channel 1α (SCN1A) are the major cause of Dravet syndrome, an infantile epileptic encephalopathy. US incidence of DS has been estimated at 1 in 40 000, but no US epidemiologic studies have been performed since the advent of genetic testing. METHODS: In a retrospective, population-based cohort of all infants born at Kaiser Permanente Northern California during 2007–2010, we electronically identified patients who received ≥2 seizure diagnoses before age 12 months and who were also prescribed anticonvulsants at 24 months. A child neurologist reviewed records to identify infants who met 4 of 5 criteria for clinical Dravet syndrome: normal development before seizure onset; ≥2 seizures before age 12 months; myoclonic, hemiclonic, or generalized tonic-clonic seizures; ≥2 seizures lasting >10 minutes; and refractory seizures after age 2 years. SCN1A gene sequencing was performed as part of routine clinical care. RESULTS: Eight infants met the study criteria for clinical Dravet syndrome, yielding an incidence of 1 per 15 700. Six of these infants (incidence of 1 per 20 900) had a de novo SCN1A missense mutation that is likely to be pathogenic. One infant had an inherited SCN1A variant that is unlikely to be pathogenic. All 8 experienced febrile seizures, and 6 had prolonged seizures lasting >10 minutes by age 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Dravet syndrome due to an SCN1A mutation is twice as common in the United States as previously thought. Genetic testing should be considered in children with ≥2 prolonged febrile seizures by 1 year of age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2015-1807

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Widespread adoption of genetic testing in IEE, ASD, and ID is expected to increase the frequency of known SCN2A cases to hundreds per year, similar to the incidence of SCN1A-mediated Dravet syndrome at 6.4 per 100,000 births.

    “Widespread adoption of genetic testing in IEE, ASD, and ID is expected to increase the frequency of known SCN2A cases to hundreds per year, similar to the incidence of SCN1A-mediated Dravet Syndrome at 6.4 per 100,000 births [35].”

    From Progress in Understanding and Treating SCN2A-Mediated Disorders (2018) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Abstract and Discussion report clinical Dravet syndrome at 1 in 15,700 births, approximately 6.4 per 100,000. But they report SCN1A-associated Dravet syndrome at 1 in 20,900 births, approximately 4.8 per 100,000. The cited rate is therefore for all clinical cases, not SCN1A-mediated cases; the paper does not assess the projected number of SCN2A cases. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, Y. W., Sullivan, J., McDaniel, S. S., Meisler, M. H., Walsh, E. M., Li, S. X., & Kuzniewicz, M. W.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Divisions of Child Neurology,
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Research, and
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2015-11-01
Volume
136
Issue
5
Pages
e1310-e1315
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2398625550
Cited by
248
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01_NS34509, R01NS034509)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
Dravet syndrome, incidence, SCN1A, de novo mutations, missense mutations, infantile epileptic encephalopathy, febrile seizures, prolonged seizures, anticonvulsant use, genetic testing, drug-resistant epilepsy, Kaiser Permanente Northern California
MeSH terms
California, Epilepsies, Myoclonic, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Retrospective Studies, Incidence, Mutation, Missense, NAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review