Cited by 28Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Nutrition and HealthInfant Development and Preterm Care

Variation in Formula Supplementation of Breastfed Newborn Infants in New York Hospitals

Nguyen, Trang, Dennison, Barbara A., Fan, Wei, Xu, Changning, Birkhead, Guthrie S.·2017·Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives We examined the variation between 126 New York hospitals in formula supplementation among breastfed infants after adjusting for socioeconomic, maternal, and infant factors and stratifying by level of perinatal care. Methods We used 2014 birth certificate data for 160 911 breastfed infants to calculate hospital-specific formula supplementation percentages by using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models. Results Formula supplementation percentages varied widely among hospitals, from 2.3% to 98.3%, and was lower among level 1 hospitals (18.2%) than higher-level hospitals (50.6%-57.0%). Significant disparities in supplementation were noted for race and ethnicity (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] were 1.54-2.05 for African Americans, 1.85-2.74 for Asian Americans, and 1.25-2.16 for Hispanics, compared with whites), maternal education (aORs were 2.01-2.95 for ≤12th grade, 1.74-1.85 for high school or general education development, and 1.18-1.28 for some college or a college degree, compared with a Master's degree), and insurance coverage (aOR was 1.27-1.60 for Medicaid insurance versus other). Formula supplementation was higher among mothers who smoked, had a cesarean delivery, or diabetes. At all 4 levels of perinatal care, there were exemplar hospitals that met the HealthyPeople 2020 supplementation goal of ≤14.2%. After adjusting for individual risk factors, the hospital-specific, risk-adjusted supplemental formula percentages still revealed a wide variation…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2017-0142

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 51 · Cited by 28

Authors
Nguyen, T., Dennison, B. A., Fan, W., Xu, C., & Birkhead, G. S.
Affiliations
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Nguyen, Trang
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2017-07-01
Volume
140
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2697114391
Cited by
28
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
formula supplementation, breastfeeding, neonates, hospital variation, racial and ethnic disparities, maternal education, Medicaid, maternal smoking, cesarean section, maternal diabetes, exclusive breastfeeding, Healthy People 2020, maternity care practices
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Breast Feeding, Humans, Infant, Newborn, New York, Socioeconomic Factors, Dietary Supplements, Infant Formula, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review