Engagement in Early Intervention Services Among Mothers in Recovery From Opioid Use Disorders
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Opioid-exposed infants frequently qualify for early intervention (EI). However, many eligible families choose not to enroll in this voluntary service. This study aims to understand the perceptions and experiences that may impact engagement with, and the potential benefits of, EI services among mothers in recovery from opioid use disorders (OUDs). METHODS: We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews (n = 22) and 1 focus group (n = 6) with mothers in recovery from OUDs in western Massachusetts. Transcripts were coded and analyzed by using a descriptive approach. RESULTS: The mean participant age was 32 years, and 13 had a high school degree or less. Five major themes emerged revealing mothers’ development through stages of engagement in EI services: (1) fear, guilt, and shame related to drug use (emotions acting as barriers to enrollment); (2) the question of whether it is “needed” (deciding whether there is value in EI for opioid-exposed infants); (3) starting with “judgment” (baseline level of perceived stigma that parents in recovery associate with EI); (4) breaking down the “wall” (how parents overcome the fear and perceived judgment to build partnerships with providers); and (5) “above and beyond” (need for a personal connection with mothers and concrete supports through EI in addition to the child-focused services provided). CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to engagement in EI among mothers in recovery from OUDs include a range of emotions, perceived stigma, and ambivalence. An effort to purposefully listen to and care for mothers through a strengths-based, bigenerational approach may help establish greater connections and foster stronger EI engagement among families affected by OUDs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Barriers continue to limit access to evidence-based supports for mothers and infants affected by substance use disorders.
“barriers continue to limit access to evidence-based supports (Goodman, 2015; Peacock-Chambers et al., 2020; Peacock-Chambers et al., 2021; Schiff et al., 2022; Trost et al., 2022)”
From Home‐based family recovery supports: Feasibility, acceptability, and adoption of training home visitors in “Mothering from the Inside Out” (2025) · cites this paper as Peacock-Chambers et al., 2020
Regardless of program location or catchment area, fear of home visiting services and the connection to child welfare alone often creates a strong deterrent to enrollment in this voluntary service.
“Regardless of program location or catchment area, fear of home visiting services and the connection to child welfare alone often creates a strong deterrent to enrollment in this voluntary service (Peacock-Chambers et al., 2020).”
From Home‐based family recovery supports: Feasibility, acceptability, and adoption of training home visitors in “Mothering from the Inside Out” (2025) · cites this paper as Peacock-Chambers et al., 2020
Cites
Codebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative Analysis
MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Kay, K., & Milstein, B. (1998) · CAM Journal · doi:10.1177/1525822x980100020301 · Cited by 1,675 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This process defined major codes that followed questions from the interview guide and minor codes driven by the data.(27) The resulting codebook included each code definition, whereas memos documented discussions or guidelines for the use of codes.”
MethodSuchman, N., Pajulo, M., DeCoste, C., & Mayes, L. (2006) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00371.x · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationRutherford, H. J. V., Williams, S. K., Moy, S., Mayes, L. C., & Johns, J. M. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00037 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peacock‐Chambers, E., Jurkowski, B. L., Kangas, S., DeCoste, C., McMahon, T. J., Borelli, J. L., Feinberg, E., Byatt, N., Zayde, A., Lowell, A. F., et al. (2025) · Infant Mental Health Journal: Infancy and Early Childhood · doi:10.1002/imhj.70019
Self-citation
- Authors
- Peacock-Chambers, E., Feinberg, E., Senn-McNally, M., Clark, M. C., Jurkowski, B., Suchman, N. E., Byatt, N., & Friedmann, P. D.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science,
- Boston University (US)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2020-02-01
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- PMC
- PMC6993421
- OpenAlex
- W3172659415
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (KL2TR002545)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017294)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Keywords
- early intervention, opioid use disorder, maternal involvement, perceived stigma, guilt and shame, ambivalence, strengths-based approach
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Fear, Female, Guilt, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Judgment, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Mothers, Opioid-Related Disorders, Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, Professional-Patient Relations, Shame, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Early Medical Intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review