Cited by 20Child and Adolescent HealthReading and Literacy DevelopmentLiteracy and Educational Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 284 of the 286 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Literacy Promotion: An Essential Component of Primary Care Pediatric Practice: Technical Report

Open access

Abstract

Early literacy promotion in pediatric primary care supports parents and caregivers in reading with their children from birth, offering counseling in interactive, developmentally appropriate strategies and providing developmentally and culturally appropriate and appealing children’s books. This technical report reviews the evidence that reading with young children supports language, cognitive, and social-emotional development. Promoting early literacy in pediatric primary care offers a strengths-based strategy to support families in creating positive childhood experiences, which strengthen early relational health. An increasing body of evidence, reviewed in this report, shows that clinic-based literacy promotion, provided with fidelity to an evidence-based model, has benefits for children, for parents and caregivers, and for pediatric physicians and advanced care providers as well. Reading with young children supports early brain development and the neural “reading network,” and improves school readiness. High-quality literacy promotion is especially essential for children who face disparities and inequities because of social factors, systemic racism, and socioeconomic risk. All families benefit from high-quality and diverse books and from developmentally appropriate guidance supporting interactions around books and stories. Thus, literacy promotion can be a universal primary prevention strategy to strengthen families and support healthy development. Partnerships at community, local, and state levels offer opportunities for integration with other programs, services, and platforms. Literacy promotion in primary care pediatric practice, recognized by the American Academy of Pediatrics as an essential component since 2014, has become increasingly common. There are successful models for public funding at federal, state, county, and municipal levels, but sustainable funding, including payment to pediatric physicians and advanced care providers, remains a need so that the benefits of pediatric early literacy promotion and the joys of books and shared reading can truly be offered on a population level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2024-069091

Cites

284 of 284 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 286 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. US Department of Education, 2007, Dialogic Reading
  2. Sulzby, 1991, Emergent literacy, Handbook of Reading Research, 727
  3. Bronfenbrenner, 2006, Handbook of Child Psychology: Theoretical Models of Human Development, 793
  4. Heckman, 2000, Ounce of Prevention Fund
  5. Navsaria, 2015, The Elephant in the Clinic: Early Literacy and Family Well-Being
  6. Latham, 2018, Kindergarten Transition and Readiness: Promoting Cognitive, Social-Emotional, and Social Regulatory Development
  7. Nieto, 1982, Children’s literature on Puerto Rican themes—Part I: the messages of fiction, Interracial Books for Children Bulletin, 14, 6
  8. Nieto, 1982, Children’s literature on Puerto Rican themes—Part II: non-fiction, Interracial Books for Children Bulletin, 14, 10
  9. Roberts, 2005, Contemporary American Indian cultures in children’s picture books, Beyond the Journal, 60, 1
  10. Lo, 1993, Asian images in picture books: what stories do we tell our children?, Emergency Librarian, 20, 14
  11. Sims-Bishop, 1990, Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors, Perspectives: Choosing and Using Books for the Classroom, 6, ix
  12. Barrera, 2003, On Reading Books to Children: Parents and Teachers, 253
  13. National Early Literacy, 2008, Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel
  14. US Department of Education, 2015, Shared Book Reading
  15. Dunst, 2012, Relationship between age of onset and frequency of reading and infants’ and toddlers’ early language and literacy development, Center for Early Literacy Learning Reviews, 5, 1
  16. Dopson NE . Supporting Hispanic Mothers With Preschool Children With Speech and/or Language Delays Via Dialogic Reading and Coaching Within the Home [Dissertation]. University of Central Florida; 2011
  17. Whitehurst, 2001, Every Child Ready to Read @ Your Library
  18. Beschorner, 2013, Parent Education for Dialogic Reading During Shared Storybook Reading: Multiple Case Study of Online and Face-to-Face Delivery Models [Dissertation]
  19. Dunst, 2012, Effects of reading to infants and toddlers on their early language development, Center for Early Literacy Learning Reviews, 5, 1
  20. Dunst, 2011, Role of children’s interests in early literacy and language development, Center for Early Literacy Learning Reviews, 4, 1
  21. Rideout, 2020, The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Kids Age Zero to Eight
  22. Chiong, 2012, Comparing Parent-Child Co-reading on Print, Basic, and Enhanced E-book Platforms
  23. Horowitz, 2017, The State of Learning Disabilities: Understanding the 1 in 5
  24. Blue Manatee Press. The reading house for nonprofit orders. Available at: https://www.bluemanateepress.com/the-reading-house-for-nonprofits. Accessed August 8, 2024
  25. Mendelsohn, 2005, Use of videotaped interactions during pediatric well-child care to promote child development: an RCT, J Dev Behav Pediatr, 26, 34
  26. Mendelsohn, 2011, An RCT of primary care pediatric parenting programs: impacts on reduced media exposure in infants, mediated through enhanced parent-child interaction, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 165, 42, 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.266 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Klass, P., Mendelsohn, A. L., Hutton, J. S., Dunlap, M., Anderson, A. T., High, P. C., Navsaria, D., COUNCIL ON EARLY CHILDHOOD, Miller-Fitzwater, A., Roby, E., Navsaria, D., Anyigbo, C. U., Glusman, M., Guevara, J. P., Hashikawa, A. N., Loria, H. M., Miller-Fitzwater, A., Nelson, B. B., Garro, N., Gomez, M., Lieser, D. J., Parlakian, R., Clark, K., Smiley, S., Sells, J., Alderman, S., Bauer, N., Peacock, G., Shriver, A., Takagishi, J., Vanderbilt, D., Garagozlo, K., Gadhia, A., Lee, M., & Recio, L.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2024-11-25
Volume
154
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W4402961964
Cited by
20
References
286
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
11.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Maternal and Child Health Bureau
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
Keywords
shared reading, pediatric primary care, parent-child reading, children's literature, language development, cognitive development, social-emotional development, school readiness, early brain development, reading network, universal prevention, health disparities, systemic racism, socioeconomic risk, family involvement
MeSH terms
Literacy, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Humans, Pediatrics, Primary Health Care, Reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review