The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THIRTY-FOUR FERTILIZED HUMAN OVA, GOOD, BAD AND INDIFFERENT, RECOVERED FROM 210 WOMEN OF KNOWN FERTILITY
Abstract
From a study of 34 early human ova (24 normal and 10 abnormal) recovered from a series of 107 patients known to be fertile whose conditions for conception were optimal it appears that the maximum fertility rate at implantation is 58%; the maximum normal fertility rate after the twelfth day of ovular development is 42%; the probable maximum fertility rate during the preimplantation stages is from 80 to 90%; the greatest ovular loss is in the preimplantation stage; the next greatest loss is during the week after implantation; the ovular loss after the first missed period may be as great as 28.6%, either with or without clinical signs and is therefore comparable to the clinical abortion rate; these defective human fertilized ova rise because of intrinsic defects rather than from defects of the local or endocrine environment, and, finally, the fertility rates and fate of fertilzed ova are roughly comparable in man and other mammals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Incidence of early loss of pregnancy
Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R., O'Connor, J. F., Baird, D. D., Schlatterer, J. P., Canfield, R. E., Armstrong, E. G., & Nisula, B. C. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198807283190401 · Cited by 2,354
Time of Implantation of the Conceptus and Loss of Pregnancy
Wilcox, A. J., Baird, D. D., & Weinberg, C. R. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199906103402304 · Cited by 1,081
Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the 'black box' of early pregnancy loss
Macklon, N. S. (2002) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/8.4.333 · Cited by 783
The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0250 · Cited by 657
Early embryonic mortality in women
Edmonds, D. K., Lindsay, K. S., Miller, J. F., Williamson, E., & Wood, P. J. (1982) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46579-9 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Hertig, A. T., Rock, J., Adams, E. C., & Menkin, M. C.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1959-01-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 202-211
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1568193073
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THIRTY-FOUR FERTILIZED HUMAN OVA, GOOD, BAD AND INDIFFERENT, RECOVERED FROM 210 WOMEN OF KNOWN FERTILITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.23.1.202
- The paper
- Hertig, A. T., Rock, J., Adams, E. C., & Menkin, M. C. (1959). THIRTY-FOUR FERTILIZED HUMAN OVA, GOOD, BAD AND INDIFFERENT, RECOVERED FROM 210 WOMEN OF KNOWN FERTILITY. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.23.1.202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.