Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 478

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COMMITTEE ON NUTRITION

LOWE, CHARLES U., COURSIN, DAVID BAIRD, HEALD, FELLX P., HOLLIDAY, MALCOLM A., O'BRIEN, DONOUGH, OWEN, GEORGE M., PEARSON, HOWARD A., SCRIVER, CHARLES R., FILER, L. J., KLINE, O. L.·1967·Pediatrics

Abstract

THE Committee on Nutrition of the American Academy of Pediatrics has strongly endorsed the use of milk and infant formula products as primary vehicles for vitamin D supplementation to ensure a total vitamin D intake of 400 I.U. per day by all infants and children. Although in the United States there are significant regional differences with respect to dairy practices in fortifying fluid milk, almost three-fourths of all whole milk sold at retail is fortified with vitamin D, and almost all evaporated milk and infant formula products contain 400 I. U. of vitamin D per reconstituted quart. In addition, vitamin D is readily available in vitamin supplements, and, undoubtedly as a result of the wide distribution and ready availability of vitamin D, the incidence of infantile rickets in the United States has remained at a very low level. This report draws attention to the lack of vitamin D in nonfat dry milk, a product used in significantly increasing amounts for preparing milk for home use for children, and possibly for infants. The use of nonfat dry milk has been accelerated recently by the increase in prices of fluid milk. For example, in 1965, the last year for which figures are available, consumer sales of nonfat dry milk amounted to 2.5 billion pounds of fluid equivalent, or about 5% of the total national consumption of milk. This total reflects an increase in consumption of almost 70% over the past 10 years. The lack of vitamin D in certain major sources of milk for the population invites the reappearance of rickets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.40.1.130

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
LOWE, C. U., COURSIN, D. B., HEALD, F. P., HOLLIDAY, M. A., O'BRIEN, D., OWEN, G. M., PEARSON, H. A., SCRIVER, C. R., FILER, L. J., & KLINE, O. L.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
1967-07-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
130-131
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2281785533
Cited by
478
References
13
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMMITTEE ON NUTRITION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.40.1.130
The paper
LOWE, C. U., COURSIN, D. B., HEALD, F. P., HOLLIDAY, M. A., O'BRIEN, D., OWEN, G. M., PEARSON, H. A., SCRIVER, C. R., FILER, L. J., & KLINE, O. L. (1967). COMMITTEE ON NUTRITION. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.40.1.130

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.