The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease: Effect on Mortality
Abstract
Newborn screening for sickle cell disease has been recommended as a method of decreasing patient mortality. However, its effectiveness in accomplishing this has not been reliably measured. To help determine the effectiveness, 10 years of experience in newborn screening have been summarized. The effects of early patient enrollment in a comprehensive treatment program on long-term morbidity and mortality are reported. From 1975 to 1985, 84,663 newborns were screened regardless of race or ethnic background. Hb Bait's was present in 5%, hemoglobin AS in 2.6%, and hemoglobin AC in 0.75%. Excluding Bart's, approximately 3.6% of all newborns were carriers for hemoglobinopathy. Sickle cell disease occurred in 1:951 births (58 Hb 55, 25 Hb FSC, three Hb S-β+-thalassemia, and three Hb S-β°-thalassemia). In addition, one in every 4,233 newborns had a clinically significant thalassemia syndrome (eight Hb FE, ten Hb F only, two Hb H). Compared with other newborn screening programs in California (congenital hypothyroidism, 1:3,849; phenylketonuria, 1:22,474; galactosemia, 1:74,103), hemoglobinopathies are the most prevalent congenital disease. Eighty-one newborns with sickle cell disease were followed up for 7.2 years. Patients experienced 513 hospitalizations, including 13 episodes of sepsis with or without meningitis and ten acute sequestration crises. The overall mortality rate for patients with sickle cell anemia diagnosed in the newborn period was 1.8%. In comparison, the clinical course of 64 patients with sickle cell anemia diagnosed after 3 months of age and followed up for an average of 9.4 years was analyzed. Five of these patients died. In two of these, sickle cell anemia was diagnosed at the time of the death. Overall mortality rate in this group was 8%. In summary, the data indicate that newborn screening, when coupled with extensive follow-up and education, will significantly decrease patient mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rees, D. C., Williams, T. N., & Gladwin, M. T. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61029-x · Cited by 2,504
Kato, G. J., Piel, F. B., Reid, C. D., Gaston, M. H., Ohene-Frempong, K., Krishnamurti, L., Smith, W. R., Panepinto, J. A., Weatherall, D. J., Costa, F. F., et al. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2018.10 · Cited by 1,501
Self-citationImproved survival of children and adolescents with sickle cell disease
Quinn, C. T., Rogers, Z. R., McCavit, T. L., & Buchanan, G. R. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-07-233700 · Cited by 907
Grosse, S. D., Odame, I., Atrash, H. K., Amendah, D. D., Piel, F. B., & Williams, T. N. (2011) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.09.013 · Cited by 707
Outcome of Sickle Cell Anemia: A 4-Decade Observational Study of 1056 Patients
Powars, D. R., Chan, L. S., Hiti, A., Ramicone, E., & Johnson, C. (2005) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.md.0000189089.45003.52 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- Vichinsky, E., Hurst, D., Earles, A., Kleman, K., & Lubin, B.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1989-05-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 834-834
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2141187979
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease: Effect on Mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.83.5.834
- The paper
- Vichinsky, E., Hurst, D., Earles, A., Kleman, K., & Lubin, B. (1989). Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease: Effect on Mortality. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.83.5.834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.