The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diabetes Mellitus During Pregnancy and the Risks for Specific Birth Defects: A Population-Based Case-Control Study
Abstract
Although the excess risk for birth defects among children of mothers with diabetes mellitus is well documented, there are few data concerning the risk for specific malformations. In the Atlanta Birth Defects Case-Control Study, those risks for malformations were evaluated. The population-based study included 4929 live and stillborn babies with major malformations ascertained by the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program in the first year of life born to residents of Metropolitan Atlanta between 1968 and 1980. The study also included 3029 nonmalformed live babies who were frequency-matched to case babies by race, period of birth, and hospital of birth. The relative risk for major malformations among infants of mothers with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitu (n = 28) was 7. (5% confidence interval [CI]1.9, 33.5) compared with infants of nondiabetic mothers. The relative risks for major central nervous system and cardiovascular system defects were 15.5 (95% CI = 3.3, 73.8) and 18.0 (95% CI = 3.9, 82.5), respectively. The absolute risks for major, central nervous system, and cardiovascular system malformations among infants of diabetic mothers were 18.4, 5.3, and 8.5 per 100 live births, respectively. Infants of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus who required insulin during the third trimester of pregnancy were 20.6 (95% CI = 2.5, 168.5) times more likely to have major cardiovascular system defects than infants of nondiabetic mothers. The absolute risk for infants of this group of diabetic mothers was 9.7%. No statistically significant differences were found among infants of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus who did not require insulin during pregnancy. These results suggest a stronger association than previously reported between maternal diabetes mellitus and specific categories of major malformations and implicate gestational diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for major cardiovascular system defects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jenkins, K. J., Correa, A., Feinstein, J. A., Botto, L., Britt, A. E., Daniels, S. R., Elixson, M., Warnes, C. A., & Webb, C. L. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.183216 · Cited by 818
(2007) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep.13.s1.1 · Cited by 699
Prepregnancy Obesity as a Risk Factor for Structural Birth Defects
Waller, D. K. (2007) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.8.745 · Cited by 470
Schaefer-Graf, U. M., Buchanan, T. A., Xiang, A., Songster, G., Montoro, M., & Kjos, S. L. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70217-1 · Cited by 270
Wu, Y., Liu, B., Sun, Y., Du, Y., Santillan, M. K., Santillan, D. A., Snetselaar, L. G., & Bao, W. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-0261 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Becerra, J. E., Khoury, M. J., Cordero, J. F., & Erickson, J. D.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1990-01-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1951862796
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diabetes Mellitus During Pregnancy and the Risks for Specific Birth Defects: A Population-Based Case-Control Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.85.1.1
- The paper
- Becerra, J. E., Khoury, M. J., Cordero, J. F., & Erickson, J. D. (1990). Diabetes Mellitus During Pregnancy and the Risks for Specific Birth Defects: A Population-Based Case-Control Study. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.85.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.