Cited by 17Bacterial Infections and VaccinesDiphtheria, Corynebacterium, and TetanusPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

No Increased Risk For Invasive Bacterial Infection Found Following Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Immunization

Griffin, Marie R., Taylor, Jo A., Daugherty, James R., Ray, Wayne A.·1992·Pediatrics

Abstract

During the acellular pertussis vaccine trial in Sweden, 4 children who were randomly assigned to receive the vaccine died of suspected or confirmed bacterial infections compared to 1 expected. There were no deaths in the placebo arm. This raised concern about the role of pertussis immunization in the development of serious infections. Through linking computerized immunization records with an active surveillance system for serious bacterial infections in children, the authors studied a cohort of 64 591 children immunized through Tennessee county health clinics who had a total of 158 episodes of invasive bacterial infections after a diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis (DTP) immunization. There were 8 invasive bacterial infections that occurred within the first 7 days following DTP immunization,yielding an age-adjusted relative risk (95% confidence interval) of 1.0 (0.5 to 2.0), compared to the interval 29 or more days following immunization. There were 7 and 20 infections in the 8- through 14- and 15-through 28-day intervals following DTP immunization, giving relative risks of 0.8 (0.4 to 1.7) and 1.2 (0.7 to 1.9), respectively. These data provide reassurance that the use of DTP vaccine is not followed by a large increased risk of serious bacterial infections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.89.4.640

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies have shown that children who received vaccinations had a similar, or even reduced, risk of unconnected infections in the following period.

    “multiple studies have shown that children who received vaccinations had a similar, or even reduced, risk of unconnected infections in the following period92–95.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffin, M. R., Taylor, J. A., Daugherty, J. R., & Ray, W. A.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
1992-04-01
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
640-642
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W1532357488
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FD-U-0000073)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (200-85-0874, 200-85-0862)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
DTP vaccine, invasive bacterial infection, serious bacterial infection, acellular pertussis vaccine, vaccine safety, children, relative risk, immunization records, Tennessee
MeSH terms
Bacterial Infections, Child, Child, Preschool, Follow-Up Studies, Haemophilus Infections, Haemophilus influenzae, Humans, Infant, Pneumococcal Infections, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, Tennessee, Time Factors, Vaccination, Cohort Studies, Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review