The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Growth of Breast-Fed and Formula-Fed Infants From 0 to 18 Months: The DARLING Study
Abstract
Anthropometric data were collected monthly from birth to 18 months as part of the Davis Area Research on Lactation, Infant Nutrition and Growth study, which followed infants who were either breast-fed or formula-fed during the first 12 months. The two cohorts were matched for parental socioeconomic status, education, ethnic group, and anthropometric characteristics and for infant sex and birth weight, and neither group was given solid foods before 4 months. While mean weight of formula-fed infants remained at or above the National Center for Health Statistics median throughout the first 18 months, mean weight of breast-fed infants dropped below the median beginning at 6 to 8 months and was significantly lower than that of the formula-fed group between 6 and 18 months. In contrast, length and head circumference values were similar between groups. Weight-for-length z scores were significantly different between 4 and 18 months, suggesting that breast-fed infants were leaner. The groups had similar weight gain during the first 3 months, but breast-fed infants gained less rapidly during the remainder of the first year: cumulative weight gain in the first 12 months was 0.65 kg less in the breast-fed group. Length gain was similar between groups. These results indicate that weight patterns of breast-fed infants, even in a population of high socioeconomic status, differ from current reference data and from those of formula-fed infants. Thus, new growth charts based on breast-fed infants are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heinig, M., Nommsen, L., Peerson, J., Lonnerdal, B., & Dewey, K. (1993) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/58.2.152 · Cited by 466
Self-citationBreastfeeding and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in Pima Indians
Pettitt, D. J., Forman, M. R., Hanson, R. L., Knowler, W. C., & Bennett, P. H. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)12103-6 · Cited by 357
Imdad, A., Yakoob, M. Y., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-s3-s24 · Cited by 288
Gaylor, E. E., Burnham, M. M., Goodlin-Jones, B. L., & Anders, T. F. (2005) · Behavioral Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15402010bsm0301_6 · Cited by 106
Martens, P. J., & Romphf, L. (2007) · Journal of Human Lactation · doi:10.1177/0890334407303888 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Dewey, K. G., Heinig, M. J., Nommsen, L. A., Peerson, J. M., & Lönnerdal, B.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1035-1041
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1597715593
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth of Breast-Fed and Formula-Fed Infants From 0 to 18 Months: The DARLING Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.89.6.1035
- The paper
- Dewey, K. G., Heinig, M. J., Nommsen, L. A., Peerson, J. M., & Lönnerdal, B. (1992). Growth of Breast-Fed and Formula-Fed Infants From 0 to 18 Months: The DARLING Study. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.89.6.1035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.