The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infant Dietary Experience and Acceptance of Solid Foods
Abstract
Objective. To examine the effects of dietary experience and milk feeding regimen on acceptance of their first vegetable by 4-to 6-month-old infants. Design. Longitudinal study, of 26-days duration, observing infants aged 4 to 6 months at the start of the study. Random assignment to treatments, within-subject control. Setting. General community in a medium-sized mid-western town. Subjects. Thirty-six infants and their mothers. Subjects were solicited through birth records and advertisements in local newspapers. Interventions. Infants were randomly assigned to be fed one vegetable on 10 occasions, either salted or unsalted peas or green beans, for a 10-day period. Outcome measures. Infant intake of the vegetable consumed during the 10-day exposure period; intake of salted and unsalted versions: (1) before the 10-day exposure period, (2) immediately after the exposure period; and (3) after a 1-week period of delay. Intake of a control food was also measured before and after repeated consumption of the vegetable. Adult ratings of the infants' videotaped responses during test feedings were also obtained before and after the exposure period. Results. After 10 opportunities to consume the vegetable, all infants significantly increased their intake (P < .001). Although they did not differ initially, infants fed breast milk showed greater increases in intake of the vegetable after exposure and had an overall greater level of intake than formula-fed infants. Adult ratings of the infants' nonverbal responses correlated positively with infant intake. Conclusions. Infants increase their acceptance (reflected both in changes in intake and in behavioral response) of a novel food after repeated dietary exposure to that food. Relative to formula-feeding, breast-feeding may facilitate the acceptance of solid foods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents.
Birch, L. L., & Fisher, J. O. (1998) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.101.s2.539 · Cited by 2,282
Self-citationThe importance of exposure for healthy eating in childhood: a review
Cooke, L. (2007) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-277x.2007.00804.x · Cited by 646
Gidding, S. S., Dennison, B. A., Birch, L. L., Daniels, S. R., Gilman, M. W., Lichtenstein, A. H., Rattay, K. T., Steinberger, J., Stettler, N., & Van Horn, L. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.169251 · Cited by 465
Self-citationEarly Childhood Obesity Prevention Policies
(2011) · doi:10.17226/13124 · Cited by 452
Anzman, S. L., Rollins, B. Y., & Birch, L. L. (2010) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.43 · Cited by 369
Self-citationLafraire, J., Rioux, C., Giboreau, A., & Picard, D. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.008 · Cited by 279
The Phenomenon of “Picky Eater”: A Behavioral Marker in Eating Patterns of Toddlers
Carruth, B. R., Skinner, J., Houck, K., Moran, J., Coletta, F., & Ott, D. (1998) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.1998.10718744 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Sullivan, S. A., & Birch, L. L.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1994-02-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 271-277
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2098622011
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.