Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 653

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice

Bartholome, William G.·1995·Pediatrics

Abstract

As the author of the first draft of the recently published Academy statement, Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice,1 I would like to comment on several of the "qualifying" or "clarifying" additions that have been made in this statement during its decade long struggle to gain Academy approval. I am particularly concerned about the possible misinterpretation of three of these additions. The first addition is the statement, "Parents and physicians should not exclude children and adolescents from decision-making without persuasive reasons"

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.96.5.981

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 653

Metadata

Authors
Bartholome, W. G.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
1995-11-01
Volume
96
Issue
5
Pages
981-982
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W1664820920
Cited by
653
References
0
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.96.5.981
The paper
Bartholome, W. G. (1995). Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.96.5.981

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.