The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experience in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Affects Pain Response
Abstract
Objective. To determine the effect of being in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) on pain responses in infants of 32 weeks' postconceptual age (PCA). Design. A cross-sectional comparative design was used. Setting. Two level III NICUs, each in metropolitan, university teaching hospitals. Patients. Infants of 32 weeks' PCA born within the past 4 days (the newly born group; n = 53) were compared with infants of the same PCA who had been born 4 weeks earlier (the earlier-born group; n = 36) and had spent that time in an NICU. Outcome Measures. Heart rate, oxygen saturation levels, and facial actions were used as outcomes in a between-group repeated measures analysis of variance across the heel stick procedure. Background variables of Apgar, weight at birth and data collection, severity of illness, age group, and total number of invasive procedures were entered into a stepwise regression. Results. The two groups responded differently to the heel stick: the earlier-born infants had less behavioral manifestations of pain than the newly born infants. The number of invasive procedures was the primary factor that explained those behavioral differences, with Apgar as a second explanatory factor. The earlier-born infants had higher heart rates and lower oxygen saturation than the newly born infants before as well as during the procedure. These physiological differences were explained by the perinatal factors of age at birth and birth weight. Conclusion. Preterm infants who spend PCA weeks 28 through 32 in an NICU are less mature in their pain response than newborn premature infants of 32 weeks' PCA. Greater frequency of invasive procedures is associated with behavioral immaturity, whereas birth factors are associated with physiological immaturity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pain activates cortical areas in the preterm newborn brain
Bartocci, M., Bergqvist, L. L., Lagercrantz, H., & Anand, K. J. S. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.015 · Cited by 507
Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates
Johnston, C., Campbell-Yeo, M., Disher, T., Benoit, B., Fernandes, A., Streiner, D., Inglis, D., & Zee, R. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008435.pub3 · Cited by 454
Self-citationClinical Importance of Pain and Stress in Preterm Neonates
Anand, K. J. S. (1998) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000013953 · Cited by 434
Long-Term Behavioral Effects of Repetitive Pain in Neonatal Rat Pups
Anand, K. J. S., Coskun, V, Thrivikraman, K. V., Nemeroff, C. B., & Plotsky, P. M. (1999) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00338-2 · Cited by 432
Grunau, R. E., Holsti, L., Haley, D. W., Oberlander, T., Weinberg, J., Solimano, A., Whitfield, M. F., Fitzgerald, C., & Yu, W. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.10.020 · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnston, C. C., & Stevens, B. J.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1996-11-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 925-930
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1562045417
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experience in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Affects Pain Response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.98.5.925
- The paper
- Johnston, C. C., & Stevens, B. J. (1996). Experience in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Affects Pain Response. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.98.5.925
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.