Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hospital and Patient Characteristics Associated With Variation in 28-Day Mortality Rates for Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Horbar, Jeffrey D., Badger, Gary J., Lewit, Eugene M., Rogowski, Jeannette, Shiono, Patricia H., for the Vermont Oxford Network·1997·Pediatrics

Abstract

Background. The outcomes for very low birth weight infants vary among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), but the reasons for this variation are not well understood. We used the database of a large neonatology research network to determine whether either admission characteristics of the infants or specific characteristics of the units such as annual patient volume and the presence of a pediatric residency program could account for observed differences in neonatal mortality rates among units. Methods. We studied 7672 infants with birth weights from 501 to 1500 g treated during 1991 and 1992 at 62 NICUs participating in the Vermont Oxford Network Database. Results. Overall, 14.7% of the study infants died within 28 days of birth (interquartile range 9.9% to 18.1%). The ratio of the number of observed deaths at an NICU to the number of deaths predicted based on the characteristics of infants treated at the NICU (standardized neonatal mortality ratio, [SNMR]) varied significantly among units (range 0 to 1.69, z = 4.24). There was no association between annual patient volume and either mortality rate (r = .17) or SNMR (r = .22). Observed mortality rates (17% vs 13%) and SNMR (1.04 vs .87) were both higher at the 24 hospitals with pediatric residency training programs than at the 38 hospitals without such programs. Hospitals with residency programs had higher average annual patient volumes (104 vs 66). In an analysis simultaneously adjusting for patient characteristics, volume, and presence of a residency program, neither volume (odds ratio [OR] per 10 additional cases treated 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI], .98 to 1.04) nor presence of a pediatric residency program (OR 1.18, 95% CI, .94 to 1.47) was significantly associated with neonatal mortality risk. Conclusion. There are differences in neonatal mortality rates among NICUs that cannot be explained by differences in the measured admission characteristics of the infants, suggesting that the effectiveness of medical care varies among units. Neither the annual volume of very low birth weight infants treated in a unit nor the presence of a pediatric residency training program was independently associated with neonatal mortality rates for very low birth weight infants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.99.2.149

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Horbar, J. D., Badger, G. J., Lewit, E. M., Rogowski, J., Shiono, P. H., & for the Vermont Oxford Network
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
1997-02-01
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
149-156
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2076617476
Cited by
179
References
1
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital and Patient Characteristics Associated With Variation in 28-Day Mortality Rates for Very Low Birth Weight Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.99.2.149
The paper
Horbar, J. D., Badger, G. J., Lewit, E. M., Rogowski, J., Shiono, P. H., & for the Vermont Oxford Network. (1997). Hospital and Patient Characteristics Associated With Variation in 28-Day Mortality Rates for Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.99.2.149

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.