The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
El Modelo Procesual de Acción en Salud como un marco de referencia teórico para entender el cambio de conducta
Open accessAbstract
A theoretical framework to explain, predict, and modify health behaviors is presented which consists of various psychological constructs and a mediator mechanism. Risk perception, outcome expectancies, self-efficacy, intention, planning, and action control constitute the building blocks for a mediator model that is based on two processes: goal setting and goal pursuit. When it comes to the development of interventions to modify behaviors, one can target either the initial motivation phase or the subsequent volition phase. This is an open architecture framework allowing for various research designs and subsets of constructs. Hundreds of studies have been conducted based on this model. Three correlational and two intervention studies were chosen to illustrate the diversity of approaches targeting physical activity in Germany and Costa Rica, dental cleaning in India and Poland, and dust mask wearing in China. They differ in terms of the predictors that emerged as most relevant for behavior change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of its Applications to Health-Related Behaviors
Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87 · Cited by 3,185
Schwarzer, R. (2008) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x · Cited by 2,569
Self-citationSocial-cognitive predictors of health behavior: Action self-efficacy and coping self-efficacy.
Schwarzer, R., & Renner, B. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.5.487 · Cited by 883
Self-citationKwasnicka, D., Presseau, J., White, M., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2013) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2013.766832 · Cited by 237
A brief intervention changing oral self-care, self-efficacy, and self-monitoring
Schwarzer, R., Antoniuk, A., & Gholami, M. (2015) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12091 · Cited by 159
Self-citation
Cited by
Psychological correlates of COVID-19 pandemic in the Austrian population
Traunmüller, C., Stefitz, R., Gaisbachgrabner, K., & Schwerdtfeger, A. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09489-5 · Cited by 120
Ren, Y., & Li, M. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.152 · Cited by 97
The application of health behavior theories to promote cervical cancer screening uptake
Dsouza, J. P., Van den Broucke, S., Pattanshetty, S., & Dhoore, W. (2021) · Public Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/phn.12944 · Cited by 27
Amirova, A., Lucas, R., Cowie, M. R., & Haddad, M. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271743 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwarzer, R.
- Venue
- Actualidades en Psicología
- Publisher
- Universidad de Costa Rica
- Published
- 2016-12-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 121
- Pages
- 119-130
- ISSN
- 0258-6444 (ISSN-L)
- 2215-3535
- OpenAlex
- W2559888041
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: El Modelo Procesual de Acción en Salud como un marco de referencia teórico para entender el cambio de conducta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15517/ap.v30i121.23458
- The paper
- Schwarzer, R. (2016). El Modelo Procesual de Acción en Salud como un marco de referencia teórico para entender el cambio de conducta. Actualidades en Psicología. https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v30i121.23458
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.