Egyptian-type Pottery in the Late Bronze Age Southern Levant
Abstract
This volume presents a group of Late Bronze Age (ca. 1500–1130 BCE; 18th–20th Egyptian Dynasties) ceramics in the southern Levant that can be linked to the Egyptian pottery tradition (imported and locally produced). It should be of interest to scholars dealing with the Late Bronze Age in the Eastern Mediterranean in general, and with the Egyptian impact in the southern Levant in particular. The volume is divided into four main parts: Part I provides the reader with a typology of the relevant Egyptian forms. Part II explores the technological traits of the material under review, including fabric analyses, as well as formation techniques. Part III is a site by site presentation of the Egyptian assemblages to offer a broad canvas of the phenomenon under review (mainly Beth-Shean, Megiddo, Tell es-Sacidiyeh, Tel Dor, Tel Aphek, Tel Mor, Ashkelon, Tell el-cAjjul, Deir el-Balah, Lachish, Tel Serac and Tell el-Farcah [South]). Part IV presents a concluding discussion. Among other issues it collates a combined chronological framework, an analysis of the repertoire and function of the Egyptian assemblages and a reflection on the role of (locally-made) Egyptian-style pottery as ethnic marker. The volume closes with 68 plates, showing drawings of the vessels discussed throughout the study. A number of authors contributed chapters on various issues. This is the first time that a full, complex picture is presented on the reviewed topic. The two cardinal issues concern (1) the nature of th…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A transition in the first quarter of the 12th century BCE is well established by the rich, well-datable ceramic assemblages from Megiddo and nearby Beth-Shean.
“A transition in the first quarter of the 12 th century BCE is well established by the rich, well-datable ceramic assemblages (Aegean, Cypriot, Egyptian and Levantine type pottery) from Megiddo (Martin 2013) and nearby Beth-Shean (Martin 2011: 140-142).”
From Absolute Chronology of Megiddo, Israel, in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages: High-Resolution Radiocarbon Dating (2014) · cites this paper as Martin 2011: 140-142
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toffolo, M. B., Arie, E., Martin, M. A. S., Boaretto, E., & Finkelstein, I. (2014) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.2458/56.16899 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Archaeology of the Bronze Age Levant
Greenberg, R. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781316275993 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Kleiman, S., Kleiman, A., & Ben-Yosef, E. (2017) · Tel Aviv · doi:10.1080/03344355.2017.1357313 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- MARTIN, M.
- Corresponding author
- MARTIN, Mario
- ORCID
- MARTIN, Mario
- Venue
- Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften eBooks
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W634639307
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Keywords
- Late Bronze Age, Southern Levant, Egyptian influence, ceramic typology, pottery technology, fabric analysis, Beth Shean, Megiddo, Tel Dor, Ashkelon, Deir el-Balaḥ, Lachish, ethnic markers, chronological framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review