The Egyptian Community in Avaris During the Hyksos Period
Open accessAbstract
Papyrus Rhind and other papyri which were kept and even written or copied in Avaris suggest strongly that the Hyksos employed Egyptian scribes and perhaps even schools of scribes. It is possible that these scribes were employed during the Hyksos Period from the former centres of Egyptian administration, but it is also possible that they were recruited from the Egyptian community in Avaris, which implies that these people were able to keep their Egyptian identity and Egyptian standards of language, culture and writing. This article investigates to what extent the Egyptian community living in Avaris before the settlement of Western Asiatic immigrants was able to keep its identity and under which conditions they were able to survive in Avaris, especially after the takeover by the 15th Dynasty, the Hyksos. The answer to this question is a challenge for archaeology and a test for recognising ethnic markers. Without the possibility of finding papyri because of poor preservation conditions of organic matters, it was still possible to identify the survival of the Egyptian community within the limits of the old walled settlement of the Middle Kingdom at cEzbet Rushdi. It is a quarter where no intramural inhumations – a typical ethnic marker of Near Eastern settlements of the Middle Bronze Age – could be found. On top of this evidence, the area without inhumations was extended to the south beyond the original borders of the town during the Hyksos Period. The neighbouring living quarters have, however, intramural inhumations and at the same time provided finds of the toggle pin – a part of Canaanite dress. The toggle pin was entirely missing in the quarter thought to be inhabited by the Egyptian community.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Bietak argues that archaeological evidence from Tell el-Dabʿa/Avaris shows an Egyptian community persisted in the old Middle Kingdom settlement at ʿEzbet Rushdi through the Hyksos Period, kept its identity, and even expanded south. It uses the absence of intramural burials and toggle pins as ethnic markers to distinguish an Egyptian quarter from neighbouring Canaanite quarters.
Key findings
At ʿEzbet Rushdi, practically no tombs were cut into the planned Middle Kingdom settlement during the Second Intermediate Period, except two in the temple area at the settlement fringe; this contrasts with the Canaanite intramural burial custom and suggests the Egyptian population continued there until the Hyksos Period, most probably to its end. In the 2010–2015 excavation south of the Middle Kingdom settlement, Complex 1 had no tombs and no toggle pins, while neighbouring Complex 2 had some tombs, including a mudbrick chamber tomb, and three toggle pins; one toggle pin came from Street 2 between Complexes 2 and 3 and one from Complex 3. Complex 1 is interpreted as Egyptian and Complexes 2–3 as Canaanite, with the Egyptian community able to expand south beyond the original town limits onto territory formerly occupied by Near Easterners. Papyri such as the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, dated to year 33 of the Hyksos king Apophis, and a 13th Dynasty seal impression of the mayor of Avaris Imeny-seneb-nefer suggest Egyptian scribes and administration; the temple precinct in A/II (c.1730–1530 BC) had a Near Eastern broad-room shrine (Temple III) and an Egyptian shrine (Temple V) side by side, with Egyptian mortuary chapels but Canaanite burials with toggle pins.
Methods
Archaeological excavation and survey at Tell el-Dabʿa/Avaris: the 12th Dynasty planned settlement at ʿEzbet Rushdi was excavated in 1996–1997 under Bietak’s direction, and the Austrian Archaeological Institute excavated south of it in 2010–2015, uncovering at least three settlement blocks separated by two straight streets each c.5 m wide. The main analysis used presence/absence of intramural inhumations and toggle pins as ethnic markers, alongside distribution patterns of domestic artefacts and seal impressions; the paper also cites papyrological evidence and a physical anthropology sample of 257 individuals from Avaris during the Second Intermediate Period.
Limitations
The paper states that at ʿEzbet Rushdi no Second Intermediate Period strata are preserved, except pits of the 13th Dynasty and following Second Intermediate Period, because the site was levelled in the 20th century for agricultural land reclamation; it also notes that papyri cannot be found because of poor preservation conditions of organic matters. It states that the evidence is limited, that the underlying early Hyksos areas cannot be definitively verified without more extended excavation, that hardly any original floors are preserved and plotted finds could belong to a previous building phase, and that it remains to be seen whether one of the cemeteries belonged to the Egyptian community. Evident from the text: the ethnic identifications rely heavily on negative evidence (absence of tombs and toggle pins) and on small-find distributions from partly excavated quarters, so the Egyptian/Canaanite distinction is inferential rather than directly documented.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 7 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Complex 1 shows similar distribution patterns of domestic artefacts such as sickle blades, mortars, loom-weights, beads, and game-stones as the other two complexes.
“Complex 1 shows similar distribution patterns of domestic artefacts such as sickle blades, mortars, loom-weights, beads, game-stones as the other two complexes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Two straight regular streets, each about 5 m wide, separated the settlement blocks.
“Two straight regular streets, each c. 5 m wide, separated them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Practically no tombs were interred within the precinct of the planned settlement of the 12th Dynasty during the Second Intermediate Period.
“The fact that practically no tombs were interred within the precinct of the planned settlement of the 12 th Dynasty during the Second Intermediate Period”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A test trench at the west edge of the excavation area revealed smaller houses with burials for the early Hyksos Period.
“A test trench at the west edge of this excavation area revealed for the early Hyksos Period smaller houses with burials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The distribution of seal impressions seems to be similar in all three complexes.
“Also the distribution of seal impressions seems to be similar in all three complexes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
In the Second Intermediate Period, with two exceptions in the temple area, no tombs were cut into the ground at Ezbet Rushdi.
“It is remarkable that the archaeological evidence shows that in the Second Intermediate Period with two exceptions in the area of the temple (which was not a habitation area and was at the fringe of the settlement), 20 no tombs were cut into the ground.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The westernmost block, Complex 1, still in continuation of the Middle Kingdom town of Ezbet Rushdi and within the extension of the demarcation line of the eastern town wall, was without any tombs.
“The westernmost block (Complex 1), which was still in continuation of of the Middle Kingdom town of c Ezbet Rushdi, within the extension of the demarcation line of the eastern town wall, was without any tombs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
A Near Eastern bent-axis temple is integrated into the precinct of Temple III.
“There is also a Near Eastern bent-axistemple integrated to the precinct of Temple III.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Another quarter, Complex 3, at the east of the excavation area, revealed smaller houses with tombs.
“Another quarter (Complex 3), at the east of this excavation area, revealed smaller houses with tombs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A recent excavation (2010-2015) uncovered, south of the planned Middle Kingdom settlement at Ezbet Rushdi, a settlement that started with the early Hyksos Period and continued until the end of the Second Intermediate Period.
“In a recent excavation (2010-2015), the Austrian Archaeological Institute uncovered, south of the planned settlement of the Middle Kingdom at c Ezbet Rushdi, a settlement which started with the early Hyksos Period and continued until the end of the SIP (Figs. 56).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At least three settlement blocks were partly uncovered in the area south of Ezbet Rushdi.
“At least three settlement blocks were partly uncovered in this area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The architecture of the building complexes shows no systematically constructed units as one would expect for an administrative district.
“The architecture of the building complexes involved shows no systematically constructed units as one would expect for an administrative district.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Taking intramural interment of tombs as an ethnic marker for Canaanite settlement and the separation of funerary and domestic spheres as a marker for Egyptians would show that the Asiatic community at Avaris did not expel Egyptians living previously at this site.
“Taking the interment of tombs within the settlement as ethnic marker for Canaanite settlement and the separation of the funerary and domestic spheres as a marker for Egyptians would show that the Asiatic community at Avaris did not expel Egyptians living previously at this site.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If the early Hyksos Period smaller houses with burials are present, this would not contradict the interpretation that Egyptians living in Avaris occupied this space in the second part of the Hyksos Period.
“If this is the case, it would not contradict the interpretation that Egyptians living in Avaris occupied this space in the second part of the Hyksos Period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The Egyptian community in Avaris seems to have contributed to a syncretism between Canaanite and Egyptian cult and religion.
“The Egyptian community in Avaris seems to have contributed to a syncretism between Canaanite and Egyptian cult and religion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The population of the quarter of the old town of Ezbet Rushdi, considered to be Egyptians, was able to expand on territory formerly occupied by Near Easterners outside the original limits of the Egyptian town.
“it shows that the population of the quarter of the old town of c Ezbet 24 czerny 2001, 13-26.Rushdi, which we consider to be Egyptians, was able to expand on territory formerly occupied by Near Easterners outside the original limits of the Egyptian town.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The Avaris population shows distinct sexual dimorphism concerning robustness.
“Most interesting is the distinct sexual dimorphism concerning robustness, which may have its origin in the selection process or the founder effect of the population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The previously investigated population sample of 257 individuals from Avaris during the Second Intermediate Period shows a marked distinction from Upper and Lower Egyptian skeletal series.
“Physical anthropologists have recognized that the previously investigated population sample of 257 individuals from Avaris during the Second Intermediate Period, shows a marked distinction towards the Upper and Lower Egyptian skeletal series.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The administration during the 13th Dynasty at Avaris was still under Egyptian authority.
“It seems that the administration during the 13 th Dynasty was still under Egyptian authority.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The distinct sexual dimorphism concerning robustness may have its origin in the selection process or the founder effect of the population.
“Most interesting is the distinct sexual dimorphism concerning robustness, which may have its origin in the selection process or the founder effect of the population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The Avaris population has its nearest similarity cluster in the Levant and in Phoenician and Punic series.
“The population has its nearest similarity cluster in the Levant and in Phoenician and Punic series.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Complexes 2 and 3 were occupied by Canaanites.
“Complexes 2 and 3 were therefore occupied by Canaanites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 19
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly pits with settlement waste appeared at Ezbet Rushdi, among them a pit of the 13th Dynasty with an impression of a seal of a mayor of Avaris with the Egyptian name Imeny-seneb-nefer.
“However, only pits with settlement waste appeared, among them a pit of the 13 th Dynasty with an impression of a seal of a mayor of Avaris with the Egyptian name of Imeny-seneb-nefer from the time of the 13 th Dynasty (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSub-units in the complex look like houses with courtyards, one exception encompassed silos, and that exception contained remains of ovens.
“Instead, one could identify sub-units that look like houses with courtyards, one exception of which encompass silos; the exception contained remains of ovens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe neighbouring house block, Complex 2, to the east, separated by Street 1, had some tombs, one of them a mudbrick chamber tomb.
“In the neighbouring house block (Complex 2) to the east, separated by 'Street 1,' some tombs were present, one of them a mudbrick chamber tomb.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe temples are surrounded by cemeteries with Egyptian mortuary chapels, but the burials were of Canaanites with toggle pins and partly Near Eastern weaponry.
“The temples are surrounded by cemeteries with Egyptian mortuary chapels, but the burials were of Canaanites with toggle pins and partly Near Eastern weaponry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe units of Complex 1 show signs of households with individual arrangements and unit sizes between about 100 and 150 m2.
“Otherwise, the units of this complex show all the signs of households with individual arrangements and unit sizes between c. 100 to 150 m 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe temple precinct in A/II from the time of the 14th and 15th Dynasties (c.1730-1530 BC) has two main temples, a Near Eastern broad-room-shrine (Temple III) and an Egyptian shrine (Temple V), standing side by side.
“The two main temples, a Near Eastern type of a broad-room-shrine (Temple III) and an Egyptian shrine (Temple V) stand side by side (Fig. 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe custom of burying the dead within the settlement is considered the Canaanites' ethnic marker, whereas Ancient Egyptians kept burial sites separate from settlements except for infant burials in pottery containers.
“The custom of burying the dead within the settlement is considered their ethnic marker, whereas the Ancient Egyptians kept the burial sites separate from the settlements except for infant burials in pottery containers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPapyrus Rhind and other papyri kept, written, or copied in Avaris suggest strongly that the Hyksos employed Egyptian scribes and perhaps even schools of scribes.
“Papyrus Rhind and other papyri which were kept and even written or copied in Avaris suggest strongly that the Hyksos employed Egyptian scribes and perhaps even schools of scribes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntramural burials were an integral custom at Avaris, which was inhabited largely by a population of Near Eastern origin.
“Intramural burials were, however, an integral custom at Avaris, which was inhabited at that time largely by a population of Near Eastern origin”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe site at Ezbet Rushdi was levelled in the 20th century, so no strata of the Second Intermediate Period are preserved there except pits of the 13th Dynasty and the following Second Intermediate Period.
“The site at c Ezbet Rushdi was levelled in the 20 th century for agricultural land reclamation.Therefore, no strata of the Second Intermediate Period are preserved, with the exception of pits of 17 czerny 2016, 427-440.the 13 th Dynasty and the following Second Intermediate Period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIt seems likely that the Egyptian community was employed because of their skills in the administration of the Hyksos, which shows in the number of seal impressions in their quarter and the nearby environment.
“It seems likely that they were employed because of their skills in the administration of the Hyksos which shows in the number of seal impressions in their quarter and the nearby environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIf the founder effect explains the sexual dimorphism, then the majority of female partners were taken from somewhere else in the Near East and not from the place of origin of the males.
“If the latter is the case, this would mean that the majority of the female partners were taken from somewhere else in the Near East and not from the place of origin of the males.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe evidence of toggle-pin distribution supports the suspicion that Complex 1 was used by Egyptians and Complexes 2 and 3 by the population of Western Asiatic settlers at Avaris.
“this evidence supports our suspicion that Complex 1 was used by Egyptians and Complexes 2 and 3 by the population of Western Asiatic settlers at Avaris.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe absence of practically any tombs within the precinct of the planned settlement of the 12th Dynasty during the Second Intermediate Period indicates that the Egyptian population continued to settle at this site until the Hyksos Period, most probably until the end of that epoch.
“is an indication that the Egyptian population continued to settle at this site until the Hyksos Period, most probably until the end of this epoch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenOther papyri seem to have been copied during the Hyksos Period by Egyptian scribes.
“Also other papyri seem to have been copied during the Hyksos Period by Egyptian scribes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause the excavated part is just south of Ezbet Rushdi, which was purely Egyptian not only in the Middle Kingdom but also subsequently, it is more sensible to assume that this excavated part was a settlement of Egyptians who needed more space and started to occupy the area outside their original town at Ezbet Rushdi.
“As we are just south of the settlement at c Ezbet Rushdi, which was purely Egyptian not only in the Middle Kingdom but also subsequently, it gives more sense to assume, for this excavated part, that it was a settlement of Egyptians who needed more space and started to occupy the area outside their original town at c Ezbet Rushdi.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Egyptian part of the population of Avaris was not only contained within the area of the ancient city walls of Ezbet Rushdi but was able to expand its habitation area towards the south on territory already held by newcomers from the Near East.
“I shall show in the following that the Egyptian part of the population of Avaris was not only contained within the area of the ancient city walls of c Ezbet Rushdi but was able to expand its habitation area towards the south on territory already held by the newcomers from the Near East.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe toggle pin is an ethnic marker and was used to hold together the garment of the Canaanite dress on the left shoulder.
“As the toggle pin is an ethnic marker and was used to hold together the garment of the Canaanite dress on the left shoulder”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Rhind Mathematical Papyrus was copied from an older papyrus, dates to the 33rd year of the Hyksos King Apophis, was kept at Avaris, and later received secondary inscriptions during the siege of that town.
“We know from papyri such as especially the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus in the British Museum that this document was copied from an older papyrus, has a date of the 33 rd year of the Hyksos King Apophis and was therefore kept at Avaris where it later received secondary inscriptions during the siege of this town as some entries show on the reverse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenNew evidence indicates that the Egyptians at Avaris were able, to some extent, to keep their identity and stayed in the oldest part of the settlement as a block together.
“To our surprise, however, there is now new evidence that the Egyptians at Avaris were able, to some extent, to keep their identity and also stayed in the oldest part of the settlement as a block together.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe fact that the Egyptian community could keep its identity and was even able to expand its building ground shows that they were respected and had even some influence.
“On the contrary, the fact that the Egyptian community could keep their identity and were even able to expand their building ground shows that they were respected and had even some influence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The question of what became of the Egyptian population during the 13th Dynasty and the Hyksos Period had not been adequately addressed before this study.
“This question has, thus far, never been adequately addressed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Archaeological evidence for the Egyptian community in Avaris had not been raised before this study.
“Archaeological evidence has thus far never been raised.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The inhabitants of the eastern Delta were always subject to ethnic influx from the east.
“one may assume that the inhabitants of this part of the Eastern Delta were always subject to ethnic influx from the east as it was until now.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Two walled planned settlements existed at Avaris, one probably going back to the Heracleopolitan Khety and one to a 12th Dynasty king Amenemhat, probably Amenemhet I.
“According to this text one has to assume two walled planned settlements, one probably going back to the Heracleopolitan Khety and one to a 12 th Dynasty king Amenemhat, probably to Amenemhet I.”
Cites
Semitic Words in Egyptian Texts of the New Kingdom and Third Intermediate Period
Hoch, J. E. (1994) · doi:10.1515/9781400863884 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Caminos, R. A., & Gardiner, A. H. (1954) · Cited by 283 · see citing works
The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus: British Museum 10057 and 10058
Thompson, D. W. (1925) · Nature · doi:10.1038/115935a0 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Geoarchaeology of an ancient fluvial harbour: Avaris and the Pelusiac branch (Nile River, Egypt)
Tronchère, H., Goiran, J., Schmitt, L., et al. (2012) · Géomorphologie relief processus environnement · doi:10.4000/geomorphologie.9701 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Geoarchaeology of Avaris: First Results
Tronchère, H. (2009) · Ägypten und Levante · doi:10.1553/aeundl18s327 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Der Fundort im Rahmen einer archäologisch-geographischen Untersuchung über das ägyptische Ostdelta
Bietak, M., Dorner, J., & König, H. (1975) · Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften eBooks · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationDie Gräber des Areals A/II von Tell el-Dab'a
Forstner-Müller, I. (2008) · Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften eBooks · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Eine Plansiedlung des frühen Mittleren Reiches
Czerny, E., Boessneck, J., & von den Driesch, A. (1999) · Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften eBooks · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Quack, J. F. (2009) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/ej.9789004174467.i-396.25 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Preliminary Report on the Geophysical Survey at Tell el-Dabca/Qantir in Spring 2008
Forstner-Müller, I. (2009) · Ägypten und Levante · doi:10.1553/aeundl18s87 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Forstner-Müller, I., & Rose, P. (2014) · Ägypten und Levante · doi:10.1553/s55 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 2010a From where came the Hyksos and where did they go, in: m. marée (ed.), The Second Intermediate Period (13 th -17 th Dynasties): Current Research, Future Pros- pects, (Proceedings of a Conference in the British Museum 2004), OLA 192, Leuven, 139-181.
- 2010b Minoan Presence in the Pharaonic Naval Base of Peru-nefer, in: O. krzyszkoWska (ed.), Cretan Offer- ings: Studies in Honour of Peter Warren, BSA Studies 18, British School at Athens, 11-24. 2016 Harbours and Coastal Military Bases in Egypt in the 2nd Millennium BC: Avaris -Peru-nefer -Pira messe, in: H. Willems & J.-m. DaHms (eds.), The Nile: Natu- ral and Cultural Landscape in Egypt. Proceedings of the International Symposium held at the Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 22 & 23 February 2013, Bielefeld, 53-70.
- HackeTT, a.J. 1997 Canaanites, in : E.M. meyers (ed.), The Oxford Ency- clopedia of Archaeology in the Near East I, 408-414.
- koPeTzky, k. 1993 Die Datierung der Gräber der Grabungsfläche F/I von Tell el-Dab c a anhand der Keramik, unpublished M.A.-thesis Univ. Vienna (publication in preparation), Univ. of Vienna.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethnic Identities in the Land of the Pharaohs
Matić, U. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108885577 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Bietak, M. (2022) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110761665-017 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationKeita, S. O. Y. (2023) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13903 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Ethnicity in Ancient Egypt: An Introduction to Key Issues
García, J. C. M. (2018) · Journal of Egyptian History · doi:10.1163/18741665-12340040 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Maat and Tianxia: Building World Orders in Ancient Egypt and China
García, J. C. M., & Pines, Y. (2021) · Journal of Egyptian History · doi:10.1163/18741665-12340067 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Mourad, A.-L. (2021) · Journal of Anthropological Archaeology · doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2021.101367 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Maaranen, N., Zakrzewski, S., & Schutkowski, H. (2022) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/723141 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Metaphor of Cultural Entanglement in Northeast African Archaeology
Budka, J. (2018) · Global Journal of Archaeology & Anthropology · doi:10.19080/gjaa.2018.03.555621 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“With a fresh emphasis on the importance of the micro histories and individuals of specific sites, the “entanglement” approach developed in the last years for Nubia can also be of relevance for sites located in Egypt [18-19].”
BackgroundImmigration and Borders in Ancient Egypt
Candelora, D. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009500111 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Anthropological Observations from Tell el-Retaba
Šefčáková, A. (2017) · Ägypten und Levante · doi:10.1553/aeundl27s99 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.006
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.007
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.004
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.008
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.005
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.003
Burke, A. A. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.001
Burke, A. A. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.002
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.009
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.010
Bietak, M. (2016) · Ägypten und Levante · doi:10.1553/0x0034ae8c
Self-citationSmith, N., & Levy, T. E. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90799-6.00198-1
- Authors
- Bietak, M.
- Corresponding author
- Bietak, Manfred
- ORCID
- Bietak, Manfred
- Venue
- Ägypten und Levante
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 263-274
- ISSN
- 1015-5104 (ISSN-L)
- 1813-5145
- OpenAlex
- W2579203579
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ägypten und Levante (publishedVersion)
- Oesterreichisches Musiklexikon online (Institut für kunst- und musikhistorische Forschungen der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Austrian Biographical Dictionary (Austrian Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Keywords
- Avaris, Hyksos, scribes, scribal schools, ethnic identity, Middle Bronze Age, Middle Kingdom, ethnic markers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review