Cited by 29Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchReliability and Maintenance OptimizationMachine Learning in Materials Science

Predicting ESP Lifespans With Machine Learning

Sneed, Jessamyn·2017·Proceedings of the 5th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15530/urtec-2017-2669988

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many examples exist where an entirely data-driven or hybrid model helps optimize pump regimes, prevent unexpected failures, and save on maintenance-on-schedule.

    “There are many examples when an entirely data-driven or a hybrid model containing physics-driven and data-driven math helps optimize the regimes, prevent unexpected failures, and save on maintenance-on-schedule [ 36 , 37 ].”

Cited by

Authors
Sneed, J.
Affiliations
Devon Energy (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Sneed, Jessamyn
Venue
Proceedings of the 5th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2745818870
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
electronic speckle pattern interferometry, machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review