The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of glutathione supplementation on swimmers’ performance
Abstract
Background and Study Aim. Continuously increasing the volume and intensity of the training sessions often leads to overtraining. It has been demonstrated that glutathione supplementation might improve the aerobic metabolism in skeletal muscle and reduce exercise-induced muscle fatigue. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of glutathione supplementation on fatigue, recovery processes, and competitive results of elite swimmers during a six-week training period. Material and Methods. Twenty-four elite swimmers (10 women and 14 men) from the Bulgarian national swimming team, with a mean age of 18.7±3.78 years, took part in this double-blind placebo control study. The swimmers from the experimental group were supplemented once a day with a capsule of 250mg glutathione, whilst the swimmers from the control group took a placebo once a day. The urine concentration levels of cortisol and cortisone, as well as the degree of overtraining, were evaluated on the 1st(T1), 14th(T2), 28th(T3), and 42nd(T4) days. Anthropometric measurements and a nutritional assessment were performed at T1 and T4. Results. The swimmers showed a gradual decrease of cortisol and cortisone during the study, with significantly lower concentrations in the experimental vs the control group at T4 (19.4 vs 42.5 ng/mL, p < 0.05). At the end of the study, the swimmers from the experimental group showed improvements in their time in 41 out of the 43 swimming events, whilst those from the control group had significantly smaller improvements (-1.66 vs -0.97%, p < 0.05). Conclusions. In conclusion, glutathione supplementation at a dose of 250mg/day for six weeks improves the adaptation of elite swimmers towards training schedules, which is likely to lead to better sports results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“supplementation of 250 mg/day of glutathione for 42 days resulted in a progressive decline of cortisol and cortisone urine values of elite swimmers of the Bulgarian national swimming team; it also enhanced the swimmer’s performance and adjustability to training regimens (49) (Table 1).”
From Junior athletes’ nutritional demands: a narrative review of consumption and prevalence of eating disorders (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, R. C., Wang, Z., Heo, M., Ross, R., Janssen, I., & Heymsfield, S. B. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/72.3.796 · Cited by 854
Selenium and training effects on the glutathione system and aerobic performance
TESSIER, F., MARGARITIS, I., RICHARD, M.-J., MOYNOT, C., & MARCONNET, P. (1995) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/00005768-199503000-00015 · Cited by 107
Cited by
Amawi, A., Khataybeh, B., Al Aqaili, R., Ababneh, N., Alnimer, L., Qoqazeh, A., Oukal, F., Jahrami, H., Mousa Ay, K., Al Saoud, H., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1390204 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Petrov, L., Alexandrova, A., Kachaunov, M., Penov, R., Sheytanova, T., & Kolimechkov, S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports
- Publisher
- Sergii Iermakov
- Published
- 2021-08-30
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 215-224
- ISSN
- 2664-9837
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of glutathione supplementation on swimmers’ performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15561/26649837.2021.0403
- The paper
- Petrov, L., Alexandrova, A., Kachaunov, M., Penov, R., Sheytanova, T., & Kolimechkov, S. (2021). Effect of glutathione supplementation on swimmers’ performance. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2021.0403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.