Cited by 854Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Total-body skeletal muscle mass: development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction models

Open access
Lee, Robert C, Wang, ZiMian, Heo, Moonseong, Ross, Robert, Janssen, Ian, Heymsfield, Steven B·2000·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Skeletal muscle (SM) is a large body compartment of biological importance, but it remains difficult to quantify SM with affordable and practical methods that can be applied in clinical and field settings. Objective The objective of this study was to develop and cross-validate anthropometric SM mass prediction models in healthy adults. Design SM mass, measured by using whole-body multislice magnetic resonance imaging, was set as the dependent variable in prediction models. Independent variables were organized into 2 separate formulas. One formula included mainly limb circumferences and skinfold thicknesses [model 1: height (in m) and skinfold-corrected upperarm, thigh, and calf girths (CAG, CTG, and CCG, respectively; in cm)]. The other formula included mainly body weight (in kg) and height (model 2). The models were developed and cross-validated in nonobese adults [body mass index (in kg/m(2)) < 30]. Results Two SM (in kg) models for nonobese subjects (n = 244) were developed as follows: SM = Ht x (0.00744 x CAG(2) + 0.00088 x CTG(2) + 0.00441 x CCG(2)) + 2.4 x sex - 0.048 x age + race + 7.8, where R:(2) = 0.91, P: < 0.0001, and SEE = 2.2 kg; sex = 0 for female and 1 for male, race = -2.0 for Asian, 1.1 for African American, and 0 for white and Hispanic, and SM = 0.244 x BW + 7.80 x Ht + 6.6 x sex - 0.098 x age + race - 3.3, where R:(2) = 0.86, P: < 0.0001, and SEE = 2.8 kg; sex = 0 for female and 1 for male, race = -1.2 for Asian, 1.4 for African American, and 0 for white and Hispanic. Conclusion These 2 anthropometric prediction models, the first developed in vivo by using state-of-the-art body-composition methods, are likely to prove useful in clinical evaluations and field studies of SM mass in nonobese adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/72.3.796

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, R. C., Wang, Z., Heo, M., Ross, R., Janssen, I., & Heymsfield, S. B.
Affiliations
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
796-803
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1862719569
Cited by
854
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 40
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2001-05-01)
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01dk042618-15)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 42618)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
skeletal muscle mass, anthropometric prediction model, limb circumference, skinfold thickness, non-obese adults, body composition, cross-validation, race and sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Body Height, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Anatomic, Organ Size, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Skinfold Thickness, Muscle, Skeletal, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review