The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Averting cracks caused by insertion reaction in lithium–ion batteries
Abstract
In a lithium-ion battery, both electrodes are atomic frameworks that host mobile lithium ions. When the battery is being charged or discharged, lithium ions diffuse from one electrode to the other. Such an insertion reaction deforms the electrodes and may cause the electrodes to crack. This paper uses fracture mechanics to determine the critical conditions to avert insertion-induced cracking. The method is applied to cracks induced by the mismatch between phases in LiFePO 4.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials
Christensen, J., & Newman, J. (2006) · Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10008-006-0095-1 · Cited by 727
Cited by
Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation
Liu, X. H., Zhong, L., Huang, S., Mao, S. X., Zhu, T., & Huang, J. Y. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn204476h · Cited by 2,376
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, Y., Zhao, X., & Suo, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Research
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1007-1010
- ISSN
- 0884-1616 (ISSN-L)
- 0884-2914
- 2044-5326
- OpenAlex
- W2118452293
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Averting cracks caused by insertion reaction in lithium–ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1557/jmr.2010.0142
- The paper
- Hu, Y., Zhao, X., & Suo, Z. (2010). Averting cracks caused by insertion reaction in lithium–ion batteries. Journal of Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2010.0142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
