The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of percolation in nanostructured transparent conductors
Open accessAbstract
Networks of nanoscale conductors such as carbon nanotubes, graphene, and metallic nanowires are promising candidates to replace metal oxides as transparent conductors. However, very few previous reports have described nanostructured thin films that reach the standards required by industry for high-performance transparent electrodes. In this review, we analyze the sheet resistance and transmittance data extracted from published literature for solution processed, nanostructured networks. In the majority of cases, as their thickness is reduced below a critical value, nanoconductor networks undergo a transition from bulklike to percolative behavior. Such percolative behavior is characteristic of sparse networks with limited connectivity and few continuous conductive paths. This transition tends to occur for films with a transmittance between 50% and 90%, which means that the properties of highly transparent films are predominately limited by percolation. Consequently, to achieve low resistance coupled with high transparency, the networks must be much more conductive than would otherwise be the case. We show that highly conductive networks of metallic nanowires appear to be the most promising candidate to replace traditional transparent electrode materials from a technical standpoint. However, many other factors, including cost, manufacturability, and stability, will have to be addressed before commercialization of these materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene
Nair, R. R., Blake, P., Grigorenko, A. N., Novoselov, K. S., Booth, T. J., Stauber, T., Peres, N. M. R., & Geim, A. K. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156965 · Cited by 9,084
Tien, H.-W., Huang, Y.-L., Yang, S.-Y., Wang, J.-Y., & Ma, C.-C. M. (2011) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2010.12.022 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Flexible organic photovoltaics based on water-processed silver nanowire electrodes
Sun, Y., Chang, M., Meng, L., Wan, X., Gao, H., Zhang, Y., Zhao, K., Sun, Z., Li, C., Liu, S., et al. (2019) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-019-0315-1 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- De, S., & Coleman, J. N.
- Venue
- MRS Bulletin
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 774-781
- ISSN
- 0883-7694 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1425
- OpenAlex
- W2006219962
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of percolation in nanostructured transparent conductors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1557/mrs.2011.236
- The paper
- De, S., & Coleman, J. N. (2011). The effects of percolation in nanostructured transparent conductors. MRS Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2011.236
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.