Material considerations for peripheral nerve interfacing
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous reviews have highlighted that physiological differences between the brain and peripheral nerves explain the differences in the range of electrical stimulation parameters used in both situations.
“Previous reviews have highlighted that physiological differences between the brain and peripheral nerves explain the differences in the range of electrical stimulation parameters used in both situations [25, 101].”
From Safety of long-term electrical peripheral nerve stimulation: review of the state of the art (2019) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Kim, Y.-T., & Romero-Ortega, M. I.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Young-tae
- ORCID
- Kim, Young-tae
- Venue
- MRS Bulletin
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 573-580
- ISSN
- 0883-7694 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1425
- OpenAlex
- W1974943702
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MRS Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Keywords
- neural interfaces, biomaterials, biocompatibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
