Cited by 16Indian and Buddhist StudiesBiblical Studies and InterpretationClassical Studies and Philology

The Formation of Canons in the Early Indian nikāyas or Schools in the Light of the New Gāndhārī Manuscript Finds

Allon, Mark·2019·Buddhist Path, Buddhist Teachings: Studies in Memory of L.S. Cousins

Abstract

The new Gāndhārī manuscript finds from Afghanistan and Pakistan, which date from approximately the first century BCE to the third or fourth century CE, are the earliest manuscript witnesses to the literature of the Indian Buddhist nikāyas or schools. They preserve texts whose parallels are found in the various Tripiṭakas, or what remains of them, preserved in other languages and belonging to various nikāyas, including sections of āgamas such as the Ekottarikāgama and Vana-saṃyutta of the Saṃyutta-nikāya/Saṃyuktāgama and anthologies of such sūtras, besides many texts that are not generally classed as “canonical”, such as commentaries. These very early collections of texts raise questions concerning canon-formation, such as whether the Gandhāran communities that produced these manuscripts had fixed āgama collections and closed canons or whether this material witnesses a stage in which collections and canons were still relatively fluid and open, and whether these manuscripts, which span several centuries, witness a shift towards fixity. This paper addresses these issues and re-examines our understanding of the formation of the canons of the early Indian nikāyas in light of the new Gāndhārī manuscript finds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1558/equinox.33395

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The term bhāṇaka is ubiquitously translated by all major scholarly authorities as "reciters," assuming their main job was to faithfully repeat preserved texts.

    “The term bhāṇaka is ubiquitously translated by all major scholarly authorities that discuss the subject as “reciters,” assuming that these practitioners’ main job was to faithfully repeat the texts that were preserved and considered as the Buddha’s word.2”

    From Performing the Buddha’s Word: The Role of the Bhāṇaka (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 16

Authors
Allon, M.
Corresponding author
Allon, Mark
Venue
Buddhist Path, Buddhist Teachings: Studies in Memory of L.S. Cousins
Published
2019-10-08
Pages
249-268
OpenAlex
W4212805542
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 11
FWCI
50.72
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Equinox Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
canon formation, Samyutta Nikaya, Tripitaka, Buddhist manuscripts, early Buddhism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review