Gendered politics of enmity
Abstract
This paper analyses the role language and gender have played in the construction of animosity among various constituencies during a political crisis in Brazil. To do so, it investigates a language ideological debate about the innovative use of the letter X as a gender morpheme – an inclusive alternative against Portuguese binary grammatical gender system. The data include op-eds, blog posts, news articles and in-depth semi-structured interviews with stakeholders in the debate. The analyses track the emergence of competing metadiscursive and metapragmatic regimes about grammar, gender and politics. On a macro-sociological level, this language ideological work helps shape politics of enmity which characterise the current state of democracy in Brazil and elsewhere. However, it also points to the emergence of situated counterdiscourses of solidarity which help individuals face an otherwise debilitating social context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Language reform from below is as political as it is potent.
“language reform from below is as political as it is potent”
From Relocating power: the feminist potency of language, gender and sexuality research (2021) · cites this paper as Borba 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Relocating power: the feminist potency of language, gender and sexuality research
Hall, K., Borba, R., & Hiramoto, M. (2021) · Gender and Language · doi:10.1558/genl.19523 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Borba, R.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Borba, Rodrigo
- ORCID
- Borba, Rodrigo
- Venue
- Gender and Language
- Published
- 2019-11-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 423-448
- ISSN
- 1747-6321 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-633X
- OpenAlex
- W2990020766
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 10.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gender and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Keywords
- language ideology, letter X, gender binary, counter-discourse, solidarity, political crisis, democracy, metadiscourse, metapragmatics, Brazil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review