‘Reclaiming my time’: signifying, reclamation and the activist strategies of Black women’s language
Abstract
This article explores how three Black women use the culturally grounded semantic and rhetorical strategies of their discursive practices as modes of symbolic action to negotiate alternative relationships and realities in response to white supremacist patriarchy. Placing intersectional feminist perspectives in conversation with the literature on African American Women’s Language (AAWL), this research applies critical discourse analysis to cases of signifying and resignification (semantic reclamation). The interactions are taken from contemporary US politics: Maxine Waters’ assertion ‘Reclaiming my time’, Therese Okoumou’s literal retooling of ‘We go high’ and Samirah Raheem’s reclamation of ‘slut’. Together they highlight three iterations of Black womanhood, intersectional feminist linguistic resistance and gendered, racialised defiance to engage with the inclusive scope of feminism. The application of interdisciplinary insights to the analysis of AAWL herein demonstrates the broader social significance and productive political power of language for intersectional women, people of colour and gender minoritised communities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The continuity of patriarchy thrives to a significant extent on the lack of a public language to describe demands for social justice, and disrupting it requires the collective use of a language that breaks the silence.
“To a significant extent, the continuity of patriarchy thrives on this lack; disrupting it requires the collective use of a language that breaks the silence”
From Relocating power: the feminist potency of language, gender and sexuality research (2021) · cites this paper as Washington 2020
Cites
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510 · see citing works
Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black
hooks, B. (2014) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9781315743134 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Relocating power: the feminist potency of language, gender and sexuality research
Hall, K., Borba, R., & Hiramoto, M. (2021) · Gender and Language · doi:10.1558/genl.19523 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Washington, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Norfolk State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Washington, Adrienne Ronee
- Venue
- Gender and Language
- Published
- 2020-12-18
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 358-385
- ISSN
- 1747-6321 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-633X
- OpenAlex
- W3114673780
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gender and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- signifying, resignification, intersectional feminism, linguistic resistance, Black womanhood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review