Transgender language reform
Abstract
Transgender people's recent increase in visibility in the contemporary United States has presented new linguistic challenges. This article investigates those challenges and presents strategies developed by trans speakers and promoted by trans activists concerned with language reform. The first of these is the selection of gendered lexical items, including both gender identity terms (woman, man, etc.) and more implicitly gendered words (e.g. beautiful, handsome). The second is the assignment of third person pronouns like she/her/hers and he/ him/his as well as non-binary pronouns like singular they/them/theirs or ze/ hir/hirs. Both of these challenges tap into the importance trans people place on individual self-identification, and they come with new interactional practices such as asking people directly what pronouns they would like others to use when referring to them. The third challenge addressed here is avoiding gendering people when the referent's gender isn't relevant or known, which can be addressed through the selection of gender-neutral or gender-inclusive language. The final challenge is how to discuss gender when it is relevant – e.g. in discussions of gender identity, socialisation or sexual physiology – without delegitimising trans identities. Several strategies are presented to address this issue, such as hedging all generalisations based on gender, even when doing so seems unnecessary in the normative sex/gender framework or using more precise language regardin…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The successful foray of inclusive language policies into linguistically diverse institutions bears witness to the mainstreaming of gender and sexuality.
“The successful foray of inclusive language policies into linguistically diverse institutions bears witness to this mainstreaming”
From Relocating power: the feminist potency of language, gender and sexuality research (2021) · cites this paper as Zimman 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saguy, A. C., & Williams, J. A. (2022) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/08912432211057921 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Relocating power: the feminist potency of language, gender and sexuality research
Hall, K., Borba, R., & Hiramoto, M. (2021) · Gender and Language · doi:10.1558/genl.19523 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zimman, L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zimman, Lal
- ORCID
- Zimman, Lal
- Venue
- Journal of Language and Discrimination
- Published
- 2017-09-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-105
- ISSN
- 2397-2637 (ISSN-L)
- 2397-2645
- OpenAlex
- W2968381676
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Language and Discrimination (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Keywords
- language reform, third-person pronouns, non-binary pronouns, singular they, gender-neutral language, gender-inclusive language, gendered language, hedging, identity construction, trans activism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review