The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interim Guidelines for Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak — United States, 2016
Open accessAbstract
CDC has developed interim guidelines for health care providers in the United States caring for pregnant women during a Zika virus outbreak. These guidelines include recommendations for pregnant women considering travel to an area with Zika virus transmission and recommendations for screening, testing, and management of pregnant returning travelers. Updates on areas with ongoing Zika virus transmission are available online (http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/notices/). Health care providers should ask all pregnant women about recent travel. Pregnant women with a history of travel to an area with Zika virus transmission and who report two or more symptoms consistent with Zika virus disease (acute onset of fever, maculopapular rash, arthralgia, or conjunctivitis) during or within 2 weeks of travel, or who have ultrasound findings of fetal microcephaly or intracranial calcifications, should be tested for Zika virus infection in consultation with their state or local health department. Testing is not indicated for women without a travel history to an area with Zika virus transmission. In pregnant women with laboratory evidence of Zika virus infection, serial ultrasound examination should be considered to monitor fetal growth and anatomy and referral to a maternal-fetal medicine or infectious disease specialist with expertise in pregnancy management is recommended. There is no specific antiviral treatment for Zika virus; supportive care is recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Musso, D., & Gubler, D. J. (2016) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00072-15 · Cited by 1,469
A Mouse Model of Zika Virus Pathogenesis
Lazear, H. M., Govero, J., Smith, A. M., Platt, D. J., Fernandez, E., Miner, J. J., & Diamond, M. S. (2016) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2016.03.010 · Cited by 909
Zika Virus Infection with Prolonged Maternal Viremia and Fetal Brain Abnormalities
Driggers, R. W., Ho, C.-Y., Korhonen, E. M., Kuivanen, S., Jääskeläinen, A. J., Smura, T., Rosenberg, A., Hill, D. A., DeBiasi, R. L., Vezina, G., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1601824 · Cited by 831
Zika Virus: New Clinical Syndromes and Its Emergence in the Western Hemisphere
Lazear, H. M., & Diamond, M. S. (2016) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00252-16 · Cited by 455
Zika Virus Spreads to New Areas — Region of the Americas, May 2015–January 2016
Hennessey, M., Fischer, M., & Staples, J. E. (2016) · MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6503e1 · Cited by 440
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Petersen, E. E., Staples, J. E., Meaney-Delman, Fischer, M., Ellington, S. R., Callaghan, W. M., & Jamieson, D. J.
- Venue
- MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
- Published
- 2016-01-22
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 30-33
- ISSN
- 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-861X
- OpenAlex
- W2268538245
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 71.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interim Guidelines for Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak — United States, 2016. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15585/mmwr.mm6502e1
- The paper
- Petersen, E. E., Staples, J. E., Meaney-Delman, Fischer, M., Ellington, S. R., Callaghan, W. M., & Jamieson, D. J. (2016). Interim Guidelines for Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak — United States, 2016. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6502e1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
