Cited by 208Hepatitis B Virus StudiesIntramuscular injections and effectsCervical Cancer and HPV Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for use of a hepatitis B vaccine with a novel adjuvant.

Open access
Schillie, Sarah, Harris, Aaron, Link-Gelles, Ruth, Romero, José, Ward, John, Nelson, Noele·2018·MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

Hepatitis B (HepB) vaccination is the primary means of preventing infections and complications caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV). On February 21, 2018, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended Heplisav-B (HepB-CpG), a yeast-derived vaccine prepared with a novel adjuvant, administered as a 2-dose series (0, 1 month) for use in persons aged ≥18 years. The ACIP Hepatitis Vaccines Work Group conducted a systematic review of the evidence, including data from four randomized controlled trials assessing prevention of HBV infection and six randomized controlled trials assessing adverse events in adults. Seroprotective antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) levels were achieved in 90.0%-100.0% of subjects receiving HepB-CpG (Dynavax Technologies Corporation), compared with 70.5%-90.2% of subjects receiving Engerix-B (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals). The benefits of protection with 2 doses administered over 1 month make HepB-CpG an important option for prevention of HBV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm6715a5

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High vaccination coverage rates with subsequent decreases in acute HBV infection incidence have been achieved among infants and adolescents.

    “High vaccination coverage rates with subsequent decreases in acute HBV infection incidence have been achieved among infants and adolescents (1318).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [1318]

    The opening section says hepatitis B vaccination prevents infection, and the Summary of Key Findings reports seroprotection in adult vaccine trials. Neither reports vaccination coverage among infants and adolescents or a subsequent decline in acute HBV incidence; searches for those terms found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For each 1.1 million doses of vaccine administered, approximately one recipient will experience anaphylaxis; however, no deaths have been reported among these patients.

    “For each 1.1 million doses of vaccine administered, approximately one recipient will experience this type of reaction (1328); however, no deaths have been reported among these patients (1318,1328).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [1318]

    The Summary of Key Findings reports overall adverse-event rates for hepatitis B vaccines, but not anaphylaxis rates or deaths among recipients with anaphylaxis. Searches for anaphylaxis, 1.1 million doses, and fatalities found no passage in our copy addressing either part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schillie, S., Harris, A., Link-Gelles, R., Romero, J., Ward, J., & Nelson, N.
Affiliations
Arkansas Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Schillie, Sarah
Venue
MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2018-04-20
Volume
67
Issue
15
Pages
455-458
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W2800687120
Cited by
208
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 8
FWCI
21.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • University of Arkansas
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
hepatitis B vaccine, CpG adjuvant, hepatitis B prevention, adult vaccination, seroprotection, anti-HBs antibodies, vaccine adverse events, Engerix-B, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations
MeSH terms
Adjuvants, Immunologic, Adolescent, Adult, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Hepatitis B, Humans, Immunization Schedule, United States, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Hepatitis B Vaccines, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Advisory Committees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review