Cited by 1,025Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyGenital Health and Disease

Human papillomavirus vaccination for adults: updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Open access
Meites, Elissa, Szilagyi, Peter G., Chesson, Harrell W., Unger, Elizabeth R., Romero, José R., Markowitz, Lauri E.·2019·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) is recommended to prevent new HPV infections and HPV-associated diseases, including some cancers. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)* routinely recommends HPV vaccination at age 11 or 12 years; vaccination can be given starting at age 9 years. Catch-up vaccination has been recommended since 2006 for females through age 26 years, and since 2011 for males through age 21 years and certain special populations through age 26 years. This report updates ACIP catch-up HPV vaccination recommendations and guidance published in 2014, 2015, and 2016 (1-3). Routine recommendations for vaccination of adolescents have not changed. In June 2019, ACIP recommended catch-up HPV vaccination for all persons through age 26 years. ACIP did not recommend catch-up vaccination for all adults aged 27 through 45 years, but recognized that some persons who are not adequately vaccinated might be at risk for new HPV infection and might benefit from vaccination in this age range; therefore, ACIP recommended shared clinical decision-making regarding potential HPV vaccination for these persons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm6832a3

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meites, E., Szilagyi, P. G., Chesson, H. W., Unger, E. R., Romero, J. R., & Markowitz, L. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Meites, Elissa
Venue
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2019-08-16
Volume
68
Issue
32
Pages
698-702
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W2967044977
Cited by
1,025
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 172 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 17
FWCI
90.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
Keywords
HPV vaccination, catch-up vaccination, adult vaccination, HPV-associated cancers, HPV prevention, vaccine recommendations, shared decision-making, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
MeSH terms
Adult, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Female, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Male, United States, Vaccination, Advisory Committees, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review