Cited by 223SARS-CoV-2 detection and testingCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Use of At-Home COVID-19 Tests — United States, August 23, 2021–March 12, 2022

Open access
Rader, Benjamin, Gertz, Autumn, Iuliano, A. Danielle, Gilmer, Matthew, Wronski, Laura, Astley, Christina M., Sewalk, Kara, Varrelman, Tanner J. +5 more·2022·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

more than tripled from 5.7% to 20.1%. The two most commonly reported reasons for testing among persons who used an at-home test were COVID-19 exposure (39.4%) and COVID-19-like symptoms (28.9%). At-home test use differed by race (e.g., self-identified as White [5.9%] versus self-identified as Black [2.8%]), age (adults aged 30-39 years [6.4%] versus adults aged ≥75 years [3.6%]), household income (>$150,000 [9.5%] versus $50,000-$74,999 [4.7%]), education (postgraduate degree [8.4%] versus high school or less [3.5%]), and geography (New England division [9.6%] versus West South Central division [3.7%]). COVID-19 testing, including at-home tests, along with prevention measures, such as quarantine and isolation when warranted, wearing a well-fitted mask when recommended after a positive test or known exposure, and staying up to date with vaccination,** can help reduce the spread of COVID-19. Further, providing reliable and low-cost or free at-home test kits to underserved populations with otherwise limited access to COVID-19 testing could assist with continued prevention efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm7113e1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Equitable vaccination coverage requires higher levels of coverage among those most at risk at the intersection of SARS-CoV-2 exposures, severity, and onward transmission.

    “Equitable vaccination coverage requires higher levels of coverage among those most at risk at the intersection of SARS-CoV-2 exposures, severity, and onward transmission(44-48).”

    From Social inequalities in COVID-19 death by area-level income in 11.2 million people in Ontario, Canada: patterns over time and the mediating role of vaccination. (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Discussion addresses equitable access to at-home COVID-19 testing and recommends staying up to date with vaccination. It does not address whether equitable vaccination coverage requires higher coverage among people at the intersection of exposure, severity, and onward-transmission risks (searched for that formulation and for vaccination prioritization of high-risk groups). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]Mercer TR, Salit M. Testing at scale during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Rev Genet 2021; 22: 415– 26. 10.1038/s41576-021-00360-w 33948037 PMC8094986 · DOI
  2. [2]Rubin R. COVID-19 testing moves out of the clinic and into the home. JAMA 2021; 326: 1362– 4. 10.1001/jama.2021.15679 34550303 · DOI
  3. [5]Jean S, Burnham CD, Chapin K, At-home testing for infectious diseases: the laboratory where you live. Clin Chem 2021; 68: 19– 26. 10.1093/clinchem/hvab198 34969103 · DOI
  4. [6]Crozier A, Rajan S, Buchan I, McKee M. Put to the test: use of rapid testing technologies for covid-19. BMJ 2021; 372: n208. 10.1136/bmj.n208 33536228 · DOI
  5. [7]Iuliano AD, Brunkard JM, Boehmer TK, Trends in disease severity and health care utilization during the early Omicron variant period compared with previous SARS-CoV-2 high transmission periods—United States, December 2020–January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71: 146– 52. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e4 35085225 PMC9351529 · DOI
  6. [8]Rader B, White LF, Burns MR, Mask-wearing and control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the USA: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Digit Health 2021; 3: e148– 57. 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30293-4 33483277 PMC7817421 · DOI
  7. [9]Rader B, Astley CM, Sy KTL, Geographic access to United States SARS-CoV-2 testing sites highlights healthcare disparities and may bias transmission estimates. J Travel Med 2020; 27: taaa076. 10.1093/jtm/taaa076 32412064 PMC7239151 · DOI
  8. [10]Graham MS, May A, Varsavsky T, Knowledge barriers in a national symptomatic-COVID-19 testing programme. PLOS Glob Public Health 2022; 2: e0000028. 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000028 PMC10022193 36962066 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rader, B., Gertz, A., Iuliano, A. D., Gilmer, M., Wronski, L., Astley, C. M., Sewalk, K., Varrelman, T. J., Cohen, J., Parikh, R., Reese, H. E., Reed, C., & Brownstein, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • General Dynamics (United States) (US)
  • SurveyMonkey (United States) (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Rader, Benjamin
Venue
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2022-04-01
Volume
71
Issue
13
Pages
489-494
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W4220921782
Cited by
223
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 39
FWCI
25.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK120899)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
COVID-19 testing, COVID-19 exposure, COVID-19-like symptoms, racial disparities, household income, educational attainment, regional variation, underserved populations, access to testing, COVID-19 prevention
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review