Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening and Testing for Hepatitis B Virus Infection: CDC Recommendations — United States, 2023

Open access
Conners, Erin E., Panagiotakopoulos, Lakshmi, Hofmeister, Megan G., Spradling, Philip R., Hagan, Liesl M., Harris, Aaron M., Rogers-Brown, Jessica S., Wester, Carolyn, Nelson, Noele P., Contributors, Rapposelli, Karina, Sandul, Amy L., Choi, Elisa, Coffin, Carla, Marks, Kristen, Thomas, David L., Wang, Su H.·2023·MMWR. Recommendations and Reports

Abstract

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. Although treatment is not considered curative, antiviral treatment, monitoring, and liver cancer surveillance can reduce morbidity and mortality. Effective vaccines to prevent hepatitis B are available. This report updates and expands CDC's previously published Recommendations for Identification and Public Health Management of Persons with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (MMWR Recomm Rep 2008;57[No. RR-8]) regarding screening for HBV infection in the United States. New recommendations include hepatitis B screening using three laboratory tests at least once during a lifetime for adults aged ≥18 years. The report also expands risk-based testing recommendations to include the following populations, activities, exposures, or conditions associated with increased risk for HBV infection: persons incarcerated or formerly incarcerated in a jail, prison, or other detention setting; persons with a history of sexually transmitted infections or multiple sex partners; and persons with a history of hepatitis C virus infection. In addition, to provide increased access to testing, anyone who requests HBV testing should receive it, regardless of disclosure of risk, because many persons might be reluctant to disclose stigmatizing risks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.rr7201a1

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Metadata

Authors
Conners, E. E., Panagiotakopoulos, L., Hofmeister, M. G., Spradling, P. R., Hagan, L. M., Harris, A. M., Rogers-Brown, J. S., Wester, C., Nelson, N. P., Contributors, Rapposelli, K., Sandul, A. L., Choi, E., Coffin, C., Marks, K., Thomas, D. L., & Wang, S. H.
Venue
MMWR. Recommendations and Reports
Published
2023-03-10
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
1-25
ISSN
  • 1057-5987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-8601
OpenAlex
W4323653103
Cited by
268
References
85
FWCI
44.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening and Testing for Hepatitis B Virus Infection: CDC Recommendations — United States, 2023. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15585/mmwr.rr7201a1
The paper
Conners, E. E., Panagiotakopoulos, L., Hofmeister, M. G., Spradling, P. R., Hagan, L. M., Harris, A. M., Rogers-Brown, J. S., Wester, C., Nelson, N. P., Contributors, Rapposelli, K., Sandul, A. L., Choi, E., Coffin, C., Marks, K., Thomas, D. L., & Wang, S. H. (2023). Screening and Testing for Hepatitis B Virus Infection: CDC Recommendations — United States, 2023. MMWR. Recommendations and Reports. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7201a1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.