The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial Interpolation Methods: A Review
Abstract
Two forms of spatial interpolation, the interpolation of point and areal data, are distinguished. Traditionally, point interpolation is applied to isarithmic, that is, contour mapping and areal interpolation to isopleth mapping. Recently, areal interpolation techniques have been used to obtain data for a set of administrative or political districts from another set of districts whose boundaries do not coincide. For point interpolation, the numerous methods may further be classified into exact and approximate. Exact methods include most distance-weighting methods, Kriging, spline interpolation, interpolating polynomials, and finite-difference methods. Approximate methods include power-series trend models, Fourier models, distance-weighted least-squares, and least-squares fitting with splines. Areal interpolation methods, on the other hand, are classified according to whether they preserve volume. Traditional areal interpolation methods which utilize point interpolation procedures are not volume-preserving, whereas the map overlay and pycnophylactic methods are. It is shown that methods possessing the volume-preserving property generally outperform those that do not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models
Fisher, P. F., & Tate, N. J. (2006) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1191/0309133306pp492ra · Cited by 405
Luo, W., Taylor, M. C., & Parker, S. R. (2008) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1583 · Cited by 273
Stress and warfare among the Kayenta Anasazi of the thirteenth century A.D
Haas, J., Creamer, W., Kvamme, K. L., Green, M., Lucius, W. A., & History., F. M. O. N. (1993) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.3530 · Cited by 74
Liu, C. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09410-3 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Lam, N. S.-N.
- Venue
- The American Cartographer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-150
- ISSN
- 0094-1689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053697364
- Cited by
- 940
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.