The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Keyframe-Based Visual-Inertial SLAM using Nonlinear Optimization
Open accessAbstract
The fusion of visual and inertial cues has become popular in robotics due to the complementary nature of the two sensing modalities.While most fusion strategies to date rely on filtering schemes, the visual robotics community has recently turned to non-linear optimization approaches for tasks such as visual Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM), following the discovery that this comes with significant advantages in quality of performance and computational complexity.Following this trend, we present a novel approach to tightly integrate visual measurements with readings from an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) in SLAM.An IMU error term is integrated with the landmark reprojection error in a fully probabilistic manner, resulting to a joint non-linear cost function to be optimized.Employing the powerful concept of 'keyframes' we partially marginalize old states to maintain a bounded-sized optimization window, ensuring real-time operation.Comparing against both vision-only and loosely-coupled visual-inertial algorithms, our experiments confirm the benefits of tight fusion in terms of accuracy and robustness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., & Urtasun, R. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248074 · Cited by 14,897
Bundle Adjustment — A Modern Synthesis
Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P. F., Hartley, R. I., & Fitzgibbon, A. W. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44480-7_21 · Cited by 3,988
Cited by
On-Manifold Preintegration for Real-Time Visual--Inertial Odometry
Forster, C., Carlone, L., Dellaert, F., & Scaramuzza, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2597321 · Cited by 1,502
Robust visual inertial odometry using a direct EKF-based approach
Bloesch, M., Omari, S., Hutter, M., & Siegwart, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2015.7353389 · Cited by 917
Self-citation(2020) · doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196885 · Cited by 633
IMU Preintegration on Manifold for Efficient Visual-Inertial Maximum-a-Posteriori Estimation
Forster, C., Carlone, L., Dellaert, F., & Scaramuzza, D. (2015) · Robotics: Science and Systems XI · doi:10.15607/rss.2015.xi.006 · Cited by 499
GVINS: Tightly Coupled GNSS–Visual–Inertial Fusion for Smooth and Consistent State Estimation
Cao, S., Lu, X., & Shen, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2021.3133730 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Leutenegger, S., Furgale, P., Rabaud, V., Chli, M., Konolige, K., & Siegwart, R.
- Venue
- Robotics: Science and Systems IX
- Published
- 2013-06-23
- OpenAlex
- W4230766380
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.