Cited by 185Climate Change Policy and EconomicsRenewable Energy and SustainabilityRenewable energy and sustainable power systems

Combining Policies for Renewable Energy: Is the Whole Less Than the Sum of Its Parts?

Fischer, Carolyn, Preonas, Louis·2010·International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics

Abstract

Since the energy crisis in the 1970s and later the growing concern for climate change in the 1990s, policymakers at all levels of government and around the world have been enthusiastically supporting a wide range of incentive mechanisms for electricity from renewable energy sources (RES-E). Motivations range from energy security to environmental preservation to green jobs and innovation, and measures comprise an array of subsidies to mandates to emissions trading. But do these policies work together or at cross-purposes? To evaluate RES-E policies, one must understand how specific policy mechanisms interact with each other and under what conditions multiple policy levers are necessary. In this article, we review the recent environmental economics literature on the effectiveness of RES-E policies and the interactions between them, with a focus on the increasing use of tradable quotas for both emissions reduction and RES-E expansion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1561/101.00000030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies show that policy mixes inclusive of both carbon pricing and policies targeting one or more market failures can achieve emission reductions at significantly lower costs than any single policy.

    “Several studies show that policy mixes inclusive of both carbon pricing and policies targeting one or more of said failures can achieve emission reductions at significantly lower costs than any single policy (Fischer and Newell, 2008; Fischer and Preonas, 2010; Acemoglou et al ., 2012; Fischer et al ., 2017).”

    From The EU ETS and its companion policies: any insight for China's ETS? (2021) · cites this paper as Fischer and Preonas, 2010

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 62 · Cited by 185

Authors
Fischer, C., & Preonas, L.
Affiliations
Resources For The Future (US)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Carolyn
Venue
International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2010-06-22
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
51-92
ISSN
  • 1931-1465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-1465
  • 1932-1473
OpenAlex
W3124100415
Cited by
185
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
31.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable Energy and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Keywords
renewable energy policy, policy interaction, tradable quotas, emissions trading, renewable energy mandates, subsidies, policy effectiveness, energy security, climate change mitigation, electricity generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review