Cited by 875Fuzzy and Soft Set TheoryMulti-Criteria Decision MakingRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic

Picture fuzzy sets

Open access
Cường, Bùi Công·2015·Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the concept of picture fuzzy sets (PFS), which are direct extensions of the fuzzy sets and the intuitonistic fuzzy sets. Then some operations on PFS with some properties are considered. The following sections are devoted to the Zadeh Extension Principle, picture fuzzy relations and picture fuzzy soft sets. Here, the basic preliminaries of PFS theory are presented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [7]7. B. C. Cuong, "Picture fuzzy sets first results. part 1," Seminar Neuro-Fuzzy Systems with Applications, Preprint 03/2013, Institute of Mathematics, Hanoi, May 2013.
  2. [8]8. --, "Picture fuzzy sets first results. part 2," Seminar Neuro-Fuzzy Systems with Applications, Preprint 04/2013, Institute of Mathematics, Hanoi, June 2013.
  3. [9]9. B. C. Cuong and V. Kreinovich, "An extended soft set model: picture fuzzy soft set," Seminar Neuro-Fuzzy Systems with Applications, Preprint 04/2014, Institute of Mathematics, Hanoi, June 2014.
  4. [12]12. P. Maji, R. Biswas, and A. R. Roy, "Soft set theory," Computers & Mathematics with Applica- tions, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 555-562, 2003.
  5. [13]13. D. Molodtsov, "Soft set theoryfirst results," Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 19-31, 1999.
  6. [16]16. L. A. Zadeh, "Fuzzy sets," Information and control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338-353, 1965. Received on September 26 -2014 Revised on October 07 -2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cường, B. C.
Corresponding author
Cường, Bùi Công
Venue
Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics
Published
2015-02-02
Volume
30
Issue
4
ISSN
1813-9663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983286635
Cited by
875
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 165 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4
FWCI
21.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (102.05)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Keywords
picture fuzzy sets, fuzzy sets, intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Zadeh extension principle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review