The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reconstructing Inca Socioeconomic Organization through Biography Analyses of Residential Houses and Workshops of Pucara De Tilcara (Quebrada De Humahuaca, Argentine)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is important to mention that this region was under the orbit of the Quebrada de Humahuaca in pre-Inka times, which could explain the absence of Inka administrative ceremonial centers, as they were located in the main Quebrada, such as the Pukará de Tilcara (Otero and Tarragó, 2017).”
From Modes of production during the Inka Imperial Period (1420–1535 AD) and the Early Colonial Period (1535–1660 AD) in the Jujuy Valley, Argentina (2024) · cites this paper as Otero and Tarragó, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Angiorama, C. I.2003. Producción y circulación de objetos de metal en la Quebrada de Humahuaca en momentos prehispánicos tardíos. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. San Miguel de Tucumán.
- Belotti López de Medina, C. R., L. López & C. Otero. 2016. At the feet of the fortress. Late Pre-hispanic Period (ca. AD 1200-1500) archaeofaunal assemblages analysis from Residential Unit (RU1), Pukara de Tilcara (Jujuy, Argentina). PLoS ONE 11 (10), e0163766.doi:10.1371.
- Bray, T. L. 2004. La alfarería imperial inka: una comparación entre la cerámica estatal del área de Cuzco y la cerámica de las provincias. Chungara. Revista de Antropología Chilena, 36 (2), 365-374.
- Bronk Ramsey, Ch.2009. "Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates". Radiocarbon, 51 (1), 337-360.
- Greco, C. & C. Otero.2015. Chronology of Settlements with Pre-Inca and Inca Occupations Superimposed. The Case of Pucará de Tilcara (Humahuaca Gorge, Argentina). Archaeometry 58 (5), 848-862.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vaquer, J. M., Llapur, L., & Stokes, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.3389/fearc.2024.1450968
Metadata
- Authors
- Otero, C., & Tarragó, M. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Anthropology and Archaeology
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- ISSN
- 2334-2420
- 2334-2439
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
