Cited by 89Water Quality and Pollution AssessmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry StudiesWater Quality and Resources Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IMPACT OF REFINERY EFFLUENT ON THE PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF A WATER BODY IN THE NIGER DELTA

Open access
OTOKUNEFOR, T.V.·2005·Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

Abstract

The physicochemical qualities of a refinery effluent and water and sediment of an effluent receiving water body were investigated.The treated refinery effluent contained very high concentrations of phenol (11.06 mg/l), oil and grease (7.52 mg/l), ammonia (8.52 mg/l), COD (91.76 mg/l), TDS (390.6 mg/l) and phosphate (6.2 mg/l), but low in sulphide, nickel, lead, copper and chromium, which were undetectable.High concentrations of phenol (5.13-16.38 mg/l), oil and grease (10.56-15.23 mg/l), and ammonia (4.31-13.17mg/l) were observed in water and sediment samples respectively, at the point of effluent impact.A high concentration of sulphide (3.74 mg/l) was accumulated in the sediment at the point of impact of the refinery effluent, though it was undetectable in the effluent itself or water sample.The concentrations of these parameters as well as of phosphate, nitrate, zinc and COD declined progressively with distance from the point of impact but were still significantly higher than in control water and sediment in samples 1.5 km downstream from the point of impact.Higher concentrations of the pollutants were recorded in the dry season than rainy season except for phosphate and nitrate, which showed the reverse trend.Nickel, lead, copper, chromium and cyanide were neither detected in the effluent nor impacted water body.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15666/aeer/0301_061072

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 89

Metadata

Authors
OTOKUNEFOR, T. V.
Affiliations
University of Port Harcourt (NG)
Corresponding author
OTOKUNEFOR, T.V.
Venue
Applied Ecology and Environmental Research
Publisher
ALOKI Ltd
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
61-72
ISSN
  • 1589-1623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1785-0037
OpenAlex
W2126967199
Cited by
89
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Applied Ecology and Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
Keywords
refinery wastewater, effluent discharge, water quality, sediment contamination, phenols, oil and grease, ammonia, sulfide, chemical oxygen demand, seasonal variation, Niger Delta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review