Atlantic Sturgeon Vessel-Strike Mortalities in the Delaware Estuary
Abstract
The Atlantic Sturgeon Status Review Team has recommended that the Secretary of Commerce list the New York Bight distinct population segment of Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus), which includes the Delaware River and Hudson River populations, as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act. Between 2005 and 2008, a total of 28 Atlantic sturgeon mortalities were reported in the Delaware Estuary. Sixty-one percent of the mortalities reported were of adult size and 50% of the mortalities resulted from apparent vessel strikes. The remainder of the mortalities were too decomposed to ascertain the cause of death, but the majority were likely the result of vessel strikes. For small remnant populations of Atlantic sturgeon, such as that in the Delaware River, the loss of just a few individuals per year due to anthropogenic sources of mortality, such as vessel strikes, may continue to hamper restoration efforts. An-egg-per-recruit analysis demonstrated that vessel-strike mortalities could be detrimental to the population if more than 2.5% of the female sturgeon are killed annually. We report on our observations of vessel-strike mortalities in the Delaware Estuary, discuss the possible implications for the Delaware River population, and recommend further research. Resumen El grupo de trabajo que revisa el estado del esturión del Atlántico recomendó que la Secretaría de Comercio enliste al segmento distintivo de la población de esturión del Atlántico (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) que habita en la Bahía de Nueva York, la cual incluye a las poblaciones de los ríos Delaware y Hudson, como especie amenazada dentro del Acta Federal de Especies en Peligro. Entre 2005 y 2008, se reportó un total de 28 esturiónes muertos en el estuario Delaware. Sesenta y un porciento de dichos animales eran de talla adulta y 50% de las mortalidades parecen haber sido resultado de colisiones con embarcaciones. El resto de los individuos muertos se encontraban en un estado de descomposición tan avanzado que no fue posible determinar la causa de muerte, sin embargo la mayoría de ellos muy probablemente perecieron como resultado de una colisión. Para las pocas poblaciones remanentes del esturión del Atlántico, como aquellas que habitan el río Delaware, la pérdida anual de algunos pocos individuos por mortalidad antropogénica, como la provocada por las colisiones con embarcaciones, pueden entorpecer los esfuerzos de restauración. Mediante un análisis de huevos por recluta se demostró que las mortalidades causadas por impacto con embarcaciones pueden ir en detrimento de la población, si perecen más de 2.5 por ciento de las hembras por año. En la presente contribución reportamos nuestras observaciones sobre la mortalidad de esturiones el estuario Delaware causadas por colisión con embarcaciones, se discuten las posibles implicaciones para la población del río Delaware y se recomiendan futuras líneas de investigación.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fish using the navigational channel in the Savannah River estuary are vulnerable to vessel strikes.
“Fish using the navigational channel in the Savannah River estuary will be vulnerable to vessel strikes”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Brown and Murphy 2010
Vessel strikes can result in injury or mortality to fish inhabiting navigational channels, with larger adult individuals being more susceptible to strikes.
“vessel strikes can result in injury or mortality to fish inhabiting navigational channels, with larger, adult individuals being more susceptible to strikes (Brown and Murphy 2010;Balazik et al. 2012;Hondorp et al. 2017;Demetras et al. 2020).”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Brown and Murphy 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rider, H. J., Morgan, K. M., Bond, A. T., Nolan, J. D., Fox, A. G., & Hamel, M. J. (2026) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-026-01901-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brown, J. J., & Murphy, G. W.
- Affiliations
- U.S. Virgin Islands Division of Fish and Wildlife (VI)
- Murphy is a senior scientist with the URS Corporation, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania.
- Corresponding author
- Brown, J. Jed
- Venue
- Fisheries
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-02-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 72-83
- ISSN
- 0363-2415 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-8446
- OpenAlex
- W2046011795
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fisheries (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Keywords
- Atlantic sturgeon, Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus, ship strikes, bycatch, Delaware Estuary, Endangered Species Act listing, threatened species, population viability, anthropogenic mortality, sturgeon conservation, population decline (ecology), sturgeon restoration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review