Cited by 27Fish Ecology and Management StudiesFish Biology and Ecology StudiesMarine and fisheries research

Effects of Salinity, Temperature, and Weight on the Survival of Young‐of‐Year Shortnose Sturgeon

Ziegeweid, Jeffrey R., Jennings, Cecil A., Peterson, Douglas L., Black, Marsha C.·2008·Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Abstract

Anthropogenic modifications of rivers and estuarine habitats have reduced the growth and recruitment of shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum throughout its native range. This study used data from laboratory experiments to examine the individual and interactive effects of salinity, temperature, and fish weight on the survival of young‐of‐year shortnose sturgeon. The shortnose sturgeon in these experiments ranged from 56 to 187 mm in total length, from 0.4 to 42.8 g in weight, and from 66 to 144 d posthatch in age. Survival in 23°C water declined as salinity increased, but salinity tolerance increased with body size. The salinity lethal to 50% of the test fish after 48 h ranged from 14.8‰ to 20.9‰. Survival in freshwater declined as temperature increased, but temperature tolerance increased with body size. The temperature lethal to 50% of the test fish after 48 h ranged from 28.2°C to 30.7°C. In factorial experiments, salinity and temperature interacted significantly to affect young‐of‐year survival. The results of the factorial experiments were used to generate a predictive model in which the probability of survival was dependent on salinity, temperature, fish weight, and all interactions among the variables. The results of this study can be used to identify suitable habitats for young‐of‐year shortnose sturgeon. The results of this study also can be used to predict the recruitment bottlenecks that may result from additional anthropogenic disturbances to rivers in the southeastern United States.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1577/t07-046.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziegeweid, J. R., Jennings, C. A., Peterson, D. L., & Black, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Jennings, Cecil A.
Venue
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Published
2008-09
Volume
137
Issue
5
Pages
1490-1499
ISSN
  • 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8659
OpenAlex
W2160685418
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Georgia
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum, salt tolerance, heat tolerance, body size, lethal temperature, habitat suitability, recruitment (biology), estuarine habitat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review