Effects of Salinity, Temperature, and Weight on the Survival of Young‐of‐Year Shortnose Sturgeon
Abstract
Anthropogenic modifications of rivers and estuarine habitats have reduced the growth and recruitment of shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum throughout its native range. This study used data from laboratory experiments to examine the individual and interactive effects of salinity, temperature, and fish weight on the survival of young‐of‐year shortnose sturgeon. The shortnose sturgeon in these experiments ranged from 56 to 187 mm in total length, from 0.4 to 42.8 g in weight, and from 66 to 144 d posthatch in age. Survival in 23°C water declined as salinity increased, but salinity tolerance increased with body size. The salinity lethal to 50% of the test fish after 48 h ranged from 14.8‰ to 20.9‰. Survival in freshwater declined as temperature increased, but temperature tolerance increased with body size. The temperature lethal to 50% of the test fish after 48 h ranged from 28.2°C to 30.7°C. In factorial experiments, salinity and temperature interacted significantly to affect young‐of‐year survival. The results of the factorial experiments were used to generate a predictive model in which the probability of survival was dependent on salinity, temperature, fish weight, and all interactions among the variables. The results of this study can be used to identify suitable habitats for young‐of‐year shortnose sturgeon. The results of this study also can be used to predict the recruitment bottlenecks that may result from additional anthropogenic disturbances to rivers in the southeastern United States.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tolerance to water temperature increases with body size in shortnose sturgeon.
“Because tolerance to water temperature increases with body size in shortnose sturgeon (Ziegeweid et al. 2008), increasing water temperatures from a changing climate will be more detrimental to juvenile survival than adults”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Ziegeweid et al. 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rider, H. J., Morgan, K. M., Bond, A. T., Nolan, J. D., Fox, A. G., & Hamel, M. J. (2026) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-026-01901-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ziegeweid, J. R., Jennings, C. A., Peterson, D. L., & Black, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jennings, Cecil A.
- Venue
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1490-1499
- ISSN
- 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-8659
- OpenAlex
- W2160685418
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Georgia
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Keywords
- shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum, salt tolerance, heat tolerance, body size, lethal temperature, habitat suitability, recruitment (biology), estuarine habitat
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review