Full Faith and Credit in Cross-Jurisdictional Recognition of Tribal Court Decisions Revisited
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While indigenous sovereigns cannot directly impose these rules and laws on citizens of other sovereigns, they can expect that equitable relationships can be worked out for cross-recognition of their issues based on comity guiding peaceful relations among states, respect for their human rights, and federal fiduciary obligations to respect their rights.
“While indigenous sovereigns cannot directly impose these rules and laws on citizens of other sovereigns, they can expect that equitable relationships can be worked out for cross-recognition of their issues based on comity guiding peaceful relations among states, respect for their human rights, and federal fiduciary obligations to respect their rights (Smith 2010).”
From Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation (2013) · cites this paper as Smith 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation
Williams, T., & Hardison, P. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0850-0 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smith, C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Craig
- ORCID
- Smith, Craig
- Venue
- California Law Review
- Publisher
- California Law Review
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 432-4
- OpenAlex
- W13798586
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
- California Law Review
- UC Berkeley
- PubMed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Keywords
- full faith and credit, tribal courts, tribal law, federal Indian law, tribal sovereignty
- MeSH terms
- Heart Diseases, Humans, Pulmonary Veins, Respiratory System Abnormalities, Vascular Malformations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
