Cited by 235Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityDigital Transformation in LawDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

Trust, but Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law

Open access
Werbach, Kevin·2018·Berkeley Technology Law Journal

Abstract

The blockchain could be the most consequential development in information technology since the Internet. Created to support the Bitcoin digital currency, the blockchain is actually something deeper: a novel solution to the age-old human problem of trust. Its potential is extraordinary. Yet, this approach may not promote trust at all without effective governance. Wholly divorced from legal enforcement, blockchain-based systems may be counterproductive or even dangerous. And they are less insulated from the law’s reach than it seems. The central question is not how to regulate blockchains but how blockchains regulate. They may supplement, complement, or substitute for legal enforcement. Excessive or premature application of rigid legal obligations will stymie innovation and forego opportunities to leverage technology to achieve public policy objectives. Blockchain developers and legal institutions can work together. Each must recognize the unique affordances of the other system.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The article argues that blockchain’s cryptographic verification cannot by itself produce durable trust; it must be integrated with legal institutions and governance. It maps how distributed ledgers can supplement, complement, or substitute for law, and proposes hybrids such as safe harbors, modular contracts, oracles, and on-chain governance.

Key findings

  • Blockchain systems can verify transactions without relying on a central intermediary, but the paper argues this is not the same as trust. The DAO episode—about 11,000 participants committing roughly $150 million in Ether, with a third taken—shows that code alone cannot resolve intent, theft, or governance disputes.
  • The article identifies vulnerabilities beyond consensus: smart contracts, edge services and exchanges, and token issuers. It cites Mt. Gox’s collapse with over $400 million stolen, Bitfinex’s loss of nearly $70 million, a 2018 Japanese exchange theft of half a billion dollars, and 2016 data showing at least fifteen cryptocurrency theft incidents of $1 million or more, totaling over $600 million.
  • It argues token sales create securities-like risks: 2017 ICOs raised over $5 billion, Telegram sought $2 billion, and almost no ICOs registered. The SEC treated The DAO tokens as securities, while Ripple paid a $950,000 FinCEN penalty and agreed to AML/KYC compliance.
  • The paper proposes three relationships between blockchains and law: supplementing existing regimes (e.g., Corda, title records), complementing them (e.g., orphan works registries, artist rights), and substituting where legal enforcement is weak (e.g., a UN food aid trial tracking aid to 10,000 Syrian refugees in Jordan). It also discusses safe harbors and sandboxes, modular legal contracts, Ricardian contracts, oracles and arbitration, and on-chain governance.

Methods

  • Conceptual and doctrinal legal analysis, not an empirical study. It synthesizes blockchain technical architecture—distributed ledgers, consensus, and smart contracts—with cyberlaw theory and regulatory examples.
  • Uses case studies and regulatory episodes: The DAO hack and Ethereum hard fork, Silk Road, Mt. Gox, Bitfinex, Ripple/FinCEN, New York’s BitLicense, the SEC’s DAO report, and the UK FCA sandbox, among others.
  • Main analysis compares legal and code-based trust mechanisms and categorizes interactions as supplement, complement, or substitute, then evaluates governance hybrids.

Limitations

  • The paper states that blockchain is still early-stage and its development remains uncertain; it notes open research questions about consensus security and performance and says its proposals are exploratory rather than guaranteed.
  • Evident from the text: published in 2018, so its regulatory and market examples predate later developments; it is normative and argumentative, relying on illustrative cases rather than systematic data; some cited estimates come from third parties such as Goldman Sachs and are not independently tested.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.15779/z38h41jm9n

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 135 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    Bitfinex was hacked in 2016, losing cryptocurrency valued at nearly $70 million.

    “Another major exchange, Bitfinex, was hacked in 2016, losing cryptocurrency valued at nearly $70 million.146”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [146]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    In early 2018, a Japanese exchange reported a theft of half a billion dollars of cryptocurrency.

    “And in early 2018, a Japanese exchange reported a theft of half a billion dollars of cryptocurrency.147”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [147]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    Vulnerabilities have already been identified in high-profile Ethereum smart contracts.

    “And indeed, vulnerabilities have already been identified in high-profile Ethereum smart contracts.134”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [134]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    Mt. Gox collapsed in 2014 after hackers stole currency then worth over $400 million.

    “In 2014, the most prominent Bitcoin exchange, Mt.Gox, collapsed after hackers stole a significant amount of currency, then worth over $400 million.145”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [145]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    The danger of a 51% attack increases when mining network power decreases.

    “The danger of a 51% attack increases when mining network power decreases.129”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [129]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims. 74
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 200
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By 2016, there were at least fifteen incidents in which cryptocurrency worth at least $1 million was stolen, with a total value exceeding $600 million.

    “By 2016, there were already at least fifteen incidents in which cryptocurrency worth at least $1 million was stolen, with a total value exceeding $600 million.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] 37. ntrepreneurs [to found] the user-generated content sites we know and love today."). 246. See Peter Van Valkenburgh, Bitcoin Innovators Need Legal Safe Harbors, COIN CENTER (Jan. 24, 2017), https://coincenter.org/entry/bitcoin-innovators-need-legal-safe-harbors [https://perma.cc/C5ES-KZGN]. 251. Christopher D. Clack, et al., Smart Contract Templates: Foundations, Design Landscape and Research Directions 5 (Aug. 4, 2016) (unpublished manuscript), https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.00771.pdf [https://perma.cc/PQW8-8GCJ] (defining operational aspect as "the parts of the contract that we wish to automa source

      The passages on enforcement (section 2.3.2, p. 4) and research challenges (section 3.2.3, p. 10) discuss smart-contract risks, not cryptocurrency theft totals. Searches for fifteen theft incidents, $1 million losses, and a $600 million total found no passage in our copy addressing those figures. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The DAO collapse illustrated the vulnerability of smart contracts: transactions siphoning off funds were valid smart contracts under The DAO's rules and subject to immutable execution.

    “The collapse of The DAO, noted in the introduction, illustrated this vulnerability.135 The transactions siphoning off funds were valid smart contracts according to the rules of The DAO, so they were subject to the same immutable execution as any others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [135]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Findingcitation

    Smart contracts automate contractual enforcement by ceding all power to the decentralized network maintaining the ledger.

    “Smart contracts automate contractual enforcement by ceding all power to the decentralized network maintaining the ledger.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [188]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Internet advocates began to call for government intervention to enforce network neutrality rules and privacy protections.

    “Internet advocates began to call for government intervention to enforce network neutrality rules and privacy protections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [195]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Arizona passed a law declaring blockchain-based digital signatures as legally enforceable.

    “Arizona passed a law declaring blockchain-based digital signatures as legally enforceable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [184]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Regulatory skirmishes over blockchain-based systems are already being fought.

    “Regulatory skirmishes over blockchain-based systems are already being fought.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Blockchains are vulnerable to selfish behavior, attacks, and manipulation.

    “Blockchains are vulnerable to selfish behavior, attacks, and manipulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] 36. Kill It, ATLANTIC (Sept. 12, 2013), https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/09/the-law-that-gave-us-the-modern -Internet-and-the-campaign-to-kill-it/279588/ [https://perma.cc/HG7W-VJEB]. 245. See id. ("It was simple and intuitive to understand for entrepreneurs and . . . has functioned as a permission slip for . . .

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisenone given

    Even if the math works perfectly, blockchains are systems designed, implemented, and used by humans.

    “Even if the math works perfectly, blockchains are systems designed, implemented, and used by humans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Miners act purely out of self-interest, but in doing so they fulfill a socially beneficial role.

    “Miners thus act purely out of self-interest, but in doing so, they fulfill a socially beneficial role.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    New bitcoin is only created through the reward mechanism, at a rate that declines over time.

    “New bitcoin is only created through the reward mechanism, at a rate that declines over time.82”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Subjective intent remains relevant even when expressed through objective code.

    “Subjective intent remains relevant even when expressed through objective code.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Each validated block is cryptographically signed with the hash of the prior block, creating an immutable chain of sequential blocks.

    “Each block thus validated is cryptographically signed with the hash of the prior block, creating an immutable chain of sequential blocks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Solutions to Bitcoin's proof-of-work puzzles require massive and growing computing power, which is sufficiently expensive to deter Sybil attacks.

    “Solutions require massive and growing computing power, which is sufficiently expensive to deter Sybil attacks.71”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [71]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    There are places the legal system cannot go, and sometimes the formalization that law imposes is an impediment to trust.

    “Yet there are places the legal system cannot go, and sometimes the very formalization that law imposes is an impediment to trust.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Legal structures such as contracts, property, corporations, and judicial enforcement replace interpersonal trust with more structured rights, expectations, and remedies.

    “Legal structures such as contracts, property, corporations, and judicial enforcement replace interpersonal trust with more structured rights, expectations, and remedies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The blockchain needs law.

    “There are points where law needs to adapt to recognize the potential of the blockchain, but the reverse is also true: the blockchain needs law.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Blockchain-based systems are less insulated from the law's reach than it seems.

    “And they are less insulated from the law's reach than it seems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Reconciliation of separate ledgers introduces complexity, delay, and possibilities for error.

    “This introduces complexity, delay, and possibilities for error.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Wholly divorced from legal enforcement, blockchain-based systems may be counterproductive or even dangerous.

    “Wholly divorced from legal enforcement, blockchain-based systems may be counterproductive or even dangerous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The blockchain is an ingenious solution for verification, but to promote trust requires something more, namely the legal system.

    “The blockchain is an ingenious solution for verification but to promote trust requires something more.”
    • Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION: CODE'S REVENGE · plain
      “That is where the legal system comes in play.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    All blockchain systems of the type Bitcoin pioneered incorporate three primary features: distributed ledgers, consensus, and smart contracts.

    “All systems of this type incorporate three primary features: distributed ledgers, consensus, and smart contracts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The proof of work system is tuned dynamically to generate a valid solution to the hashing puzzle for a block roughly once every ten minutes.

    “The proof of work system is tuned dynamically to generate a valid solution to the hashing puzzle for a block roughly once every ten minutes.74”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [74]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    If each organization or computer keeps its own ledger, every transaction is recorded independently at least twice.

    “If, on the other hand, each organization or computer keeps its own ledger (as with most corporate financial records), every transaction is recorded independently at least twice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A public blockchain, such as Bitcoin's, records all transactions on the network and is totally transparent to all participants.

    “A public blockchain, such as Bitcoin's, records all transactions on the network and is totally transparent to all participants.77”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [77]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Consensus affirms the integrity both of each individual transaction and of the ledger as a whole.

    “Consensus affirms the integrity both of each individual transaction and of the ledger as a whole.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [73]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A single distributed ledger replaces many private ledgers that must be reconciled for consistency, reducing transaction costs.

    “Second, the single distributed ledger replaces many private ledgers that must be reconciled for consistency, thus reducing transaction costs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Blockchain-based systems may supplement, complement, or substitute for legal enforcement.

    “They may supplement, complement, or substitute for legal enforcement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Developers of blockchain-based systems will often need to incorporate both dry code and wet code.

    “And surprisingly, developers of blockchain-based systems will often need to incorporate both.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    A blockchain allows confidence in transactions without trusting the integrity of any individuals, intermediaries, or governments.

    “First, one can have confidence in transactions without trusting the integrity of any individuals, intermediaries, or governments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    A blockchain is a kind of distributed ledger with no master copy.

    “A blockchain is a kind of distributed ledger.58 It is”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Realizing the blockchain's potential will require a careful mapping of the respective roles of the dry code of cryptography and the wet code of law.

    “Realizing its potential, however, will require a careful mapping of the respective roles of the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reason the blockchain needs law is that both the blockchain and the law are, at their core, mechanisms of trust.

    “The reason the blockchain needs law is that both the blockchain and the law are, at their core, mechanisms of trust.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Any participant in a blockchain network can maintain an instantiation of the ledger and be confident it matches all others.

    “Any participant in the network can maintain an instantiation of the ledger, yet be confident it matches all the others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Nakamoto's response to Sybil attacks combined cryptographic techniques with insights from game theory.

    “Nakamoto's response to Sybil attacks cleverly combined cryptographic 64 techniques with insights from game theory.65”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [64]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [65]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    Blockchains provide a distributed yet provably accurate record.

    “Blockchains use complex technology, but their basic function is simple: providing a distributed yet provably accurate record.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Maintaining synchronization, called consensus, is the hard part because there is no canonical master copy.

    “Maintaining that synchronization, called consensus, is the hard part, because there is no canonical master copy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The blockchain's impact will depend on its developers' ability to connect Satoshi Nakamoto's cryptoeconomic trust model with the formal structures and institutions of legal enforcement.

    “Its impact will depend on its developers' ability to connect Satoshi Nakamoto's cryptoeconomic trust model with the formal structures and institutions of legal enforcement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisenone given

    The magic of distributed ledgers is to make certain activities trustworthy without the need to trust anyone in particular.

    “The magic of distributed ledgers is to make certain activities trustworthy without the need to trust anyone in particular.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The idea of smart contracts was introduced independently from blockchains, and well before Bitcoin was developed.

    “The idea of smart contracts was introduced independently from blockchains, and well before Bitcoin was developed.86”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [86]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    To achieve their potential and avoid catastrophic failures, blockchain-based systems will need to integrate with the operations and institutions of the law.

    “To achieve their monumental potential and avoid catastrophic failures, blockchain-based systems will need to integrate with the operations and institutions of the law.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Distributed ledger technology allows participants to trust the outcome of a system without trusting any individual participant.

    “Distributed ledger technology allows participants to trust the outcome of a system without trusting any individual participant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The blockchain could become a transformative technology for business, government, and society on the scale of the Internet, but only if it reaches accommodations with law.

    “The blockchain could indeed become a transformative technology for business, government, and society on the scale of the Internet, but only if it reaches accommodations with law.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The blockchain is a novel solution to the age-old human problem of trust.

    “Created to support the Bitcoin digital currency, the blockchain is actually something deeper: a novel solution to the age-old human problem of trust.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Law is the blockchain's destiny, not its undoing.

    “This Article defends the contrarian claim that law is the blockchain's destiny, not its undoing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Bitcoin development community is engaged in debates about mechanisms such as increasing the size of each block to improve performance.

    “The Bitcoin development community is engaged in debates about mechanisms such as increasing the size of each block to improve performance.119”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [119]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The most prominent platform for smart contracts today is Ethereum, which launched in 2015.

    “The most prominent platform for smart contracts today is Ethereum, which launched in 2015.88”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [88]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 2011, DigiNotar, a Dutch certificate authority, was hacked; fraudulent certificates were issued which allowed attackers to intercept and redirect traffic between users and Google's Gmail service, and the incident shows the risk of centralized systems.

    “In 2011, DigiNotar, a Dutch certificate authority, was hacked.105 Fraudulent certificates were issued which allowed attackers to intercept and redirect traffic between users and Google's Gmail service.The damage was limited because Google and web browser vendors acted quickly to invalidate the fraudulent certificates, but the incident shows the risk of centralized systems.106”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [105]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [106]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Permissioned blockchains may not need to worry about 51% attacks, but they face more traditional information security concerns of centralized systems.

    “And while permissioned blockchains, which have an additional layer of centralized trust over the participants in the network, may not need to worry about 51% of the attacks, they face more of the traditional information security concerns of centralized systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Token purchasers today generally contribute money to blockchain-based projects with virtually no way to guarantee they get anything in return, and very limited information about risks.

    “Token purchasers today are generally contributing money to blockchain-based projects with virtually no way to guarantee they get anything in return, and very limited information about risks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In proof of work systems like Bitcoin, the only two ways to obtain cryptocurrency are through mining or by exchanging with someone else.

    “In proof of work systems like Bitcoin, the only two ways to obtain cryptocurrency are through mining or by exchanging with someone else.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cryptographic immutability makes blockchain-based systems trustworthy, but it also leads to problems that code itself cannot solve.

    “That power makes blockchain-based systems trustworthy, but it also leads to problems that code itself cannot solve.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Ether, Ethereum's cryptocurrency, is now easily the second most valuable after bitcoin.

    “Ether, Ethereum's cryptocurrency, is now easily the second most valuable after bitcoin.90”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [90]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 2016, authorities in Buenos Aires, Argentina forbade credit card companies from processing transactions for Uber, and Xapo's bitcoin-based debit card was able to circumvent the ban because it did not require a local connection to a traditional payment processor.

    “In 2016, authorities in Buenos Aires, Argentina forbade credit card companies from processing transactions for the ride-hailing company Uber, which was violating local regulations.Xapo, which offers a bitcoin-based debit card, was able to circumvent the ban 101 because it did not require a local connection to a traditional payment processor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [101]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    One of Bitcoin's value propositions is to serve as a residual store of value in many ways superior to gold, which today is a $7 trillion asset class.

    “One of Bitcoin's value propositions is to serve as a residual store of value in many ways superior to gold, which today is a $7 trillion asset class. 103”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [103]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Quantum computers might be able to break encryption methods that the most powerful conventional computers cannot crack.

    “Quantum computers, for example, might be able to break encryption methods that the most powerful conventional computers cannot crack.125”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [125]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    These alternative consensus techniques have their own limitations and have survived less real-world exposure than Bitcoin.

    “However, these techniques have their own limitations and have survived less real-world exposure than Bitcoin.132”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [132]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Nakamoto's consensus solution is remarkably robust, but it can be overcome by a 51% attack.

    “Nakamoto's solution for consensus is remarkably robust, but it can be overcome by a 51% attack.126”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [126]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Although there has been some effort to require licensing of cryptocurrency exchanges, the global nature of the market means many exchanges are effectively unregulated.

    “Although there has been some effort to require licensing of cryptocurrency exchanges, the global nature of the market means many exchanges are effectively unregulated.148”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [148]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The blockchain offers tremendous potential benefits, but it also poses very serious risks and public policy challenges.

    “The blockchain offers tremendous potential benefits.It also poses very serious risks and public policy challenges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Smart contracts are essentially autonomous software agents.

    “Smart contracts are essentially autonomous software agents.87”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [87]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bitcoin validates a block roughly every ten minutes, and currently has a theoretical limit of seven transactions per second.

    “Bitcoin validates a block roughly every ten minutes, and currently has a theoretical limit of seven transactions per second.112”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [112]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Given the uncertainties and technical complexities of blockchain technology, most investors are unlikely to understand what they are getting into, even with extensive financial disclosure.

    “Given all the uncertainties and technical complexities of blockchain technology, most investors are unlikely to understand what they are getting into, even with extensive financial disclosure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The blockchain is clearly more than a fad.

    “There are so many well-founded efforts underway, so many significant use cases, so much support from major enterprises, and so much capital flowing in that the blockchain is clearly more than a fad.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the blockchain entirely replaces reliance on people, companies, and governments with reliance on software code and cryptography, it will produce distrust.

    “If the blockchain entirely replaces reliance on people, companies, and governments with reliance on software code and cryptography, it will produce distrust.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Ethereum offers a Turing-complete programming language, meaning that in theory any application that runs on a conventional computer can be executed on the distributed computer of its consensus network.

    “Ethereum offers a Turing-complete programming language, meaning that in theory, any application that runs on a conventional computer can be executed on the distributed computer of its consensus network.89”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The BitLicense recipients-Circle, Ripple, and Coinbase-were three of the best-funded startups in the space, reinforcing concerns that BitLicense would crowd out innovative small players.

    “The recipients-Circle, Ripple, and Coinbase-were three of the best-funded startups in the space, reinforcing concerns that BitLicense would crowd out innovative small players.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Questions about surveillance and permissible uses of technology are not new.

    “The point is that these are not new questions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Universal freedom, at the limit, is tantamount to anarchy: Thomas Hobbes' war of all against all.

    “Universal freedom, at the limit, is tantamount to anarchy: Thomas Hobbes' war of all against all.177”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [177]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Ripple's business model depends on its ability to develop partnerships with financial institutions around the world.

    “Its business model depends on its ability to develop partnerships with financial institutions around the world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The classification controversy in the 1990s could not have been resolved quickly because the technology was too immature and its implementation too limited.

    “There was no way the classification controversy could have been resolved quickly in the 1990s because the technology was too immature and its implementation too limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In response to the FinCEN action, Ripple agreed to a $950,000 fine and committed to establish an AML/KYC compliance regime.

    “In response to the FinCEN action, Ripple agreed to a $950,000 fine and committed to establish an AML/KYC compliance regime.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [204]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Ripple sanctions were a turning point for the cryptocurrency industry.

    “The Ripple sanctions were a turning point for the cryptocurrency industry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The BitLicense regulations were drafted in a way that seemed to cover many cryptocurrency businesses other than custodial exchanges, and the certification process was cumbersome.

    “The regulations were drafted in a way that seemed to cover many cryptocurrency businesses other than custodial exchanges, and the certification process was cumbersome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    AML/KYC rules are designed to prevent criminals and terrorists from using the banking system to support their activities.

    “These are designed to prevent criminals and terrorists from using the banking system to support their activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Unlike Bitcoin, which is a protocol implemented on a distributed network, Ripple is a for-profit company.

    “Unlike Bitcoin, which is a protocol implemented on a distributed network, Ripple is a for-profit company.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Xapo relocated its headquarters from California to Switzerland ten days after the FinCEN decision.

    “Xapo, a venturebacked Bitcoin wallet startup, relocated its headquarters from California to Switzerland ten days after the decision.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [205]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In 2015, FinCEN announced a civil enforcement action against Ripple.

    “In 2015, FinCEN, the financial crimes enforcement office of the United States Treasury Department, announced a civil enforcement action against Ripple.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [202]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There are three major types of controversies over blockchain-based systems: illegality, classification, and legal validity.

    “Broadly speaking, there are three major types of controversies: illegality, classification, and legal validity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In a truly decentralized network, there is no way to impose limits on money transfers to known terrorists, transactions selling children into modern slavery, or laundering of funds known to be stolen.

    “In a truly decentralized network, there is no way to impose limits on money transfers to known terrorists, transactions selling children into modern slavery, or laundering of funds known to be stolen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There is no good way to represent terms such as "reasonable" or "best efforts" in code.

    “There is no good way to represent terms such as “reasonable” or “best efforts” in code.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    As of early 2017, only three BitLicenses had been granted, despite dozens of applications.

    “As of early 2017, only three BitLicenses had been granted, despite dozens of applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [207]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Code that makes it difficult to engage in censorship or tampering also makes it easier to engage in terrorist financing or ransomware.

    “The open question is how to deal with code that makes it quite difficult to engage in censorship or tampering, which also makes it easier to engage in terrorist financing or ransomware.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    There are some things computers cannot do as well as humans, and the same is true for smart contracts.

    “No matter how fast they calculate, there are some things computers cannot do as well as humans.The same is true for smart contracts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [190]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Regulation as a facilitator of blockchain development is gaining currency, particularly with the rise of permissioned ledgers and enterprise-grade systems on top of public ledgers.

    “Particularly with the rise of permissioned ledgers and enterprise-grade systems on top of public ledgers, regulation as a facilitator of blockchain development is gaining currency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some companies saw the FinCEN action as a signal that the U.S. was not a hospitable jurisdiction for cryptocurrency companies.

    “Some companies saw the FinCEN action as a signal that the U.S. was not a hospitable jurisdiction for cryptocurrency companies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [205]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Automating contractual enforcement is not as neat as automating execution.

    “Automating contractual enforcement is not as neat as automating execution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The blockchain adds a new chapter to the story of digital technology but does not fundamentally change the balance of power.

    “The blockchain adds a new chapter to this story, but does not fundamentally change the balance of power.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Criminals and terrorists will try to exploit the blockchain, just as they exploit other technologies whenever possible.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The practical implications of Internet telephony classification involved more than a decade of contentious debates.

    “The practical implications in the case of Internet telephony involved more than a decade of contentious debates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [199]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Sometimes the meaning of a contract is best understood in terms of the intent of the parties rather than the precise meaning of the terms they used.

    “And sometimes the meaning of the contract is best understood in terms of the intent of the parties rather than the precise meaning of the terms they used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    There may be practical difficulties in identifying pseudonymous or anonymous counterparties and in bringing legal actions against actors in other countries.

    “There may be practical difficulties in identifying pseudonymous or anonymous counterparties, as well as in bringing legal actions against actors in other countries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Code, by creating decentralized digital bearer instruments, creates an attractive target for thieves, both external and internal.

    “A related concern is that code, by creating decentralized digital bearer instruments, creates an attractive target for thieves, both external and internal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is an inherent conflict between the innovative scope of something like Augur and legitimate public policy considerations.

    “There seems to be an inherent conflict between the innovative scope of something like Augur and legitimate public policy considerations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Augur developers do not control what questions can be posted on the prediction market.
    • Rests on an assumption: On a distributed platform such as Augur, administrators cannot delete illegal, offensive, or harassing material that users post, unlike on Facebook or Reddit.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Even when transactions are entirely digital, peer-to-peer, cross-border, and cryptographically secured, providers and users on the network can be identified and subject to territorial legal obligations.

    “Even when transactions are entirely digital, peer-to-peer, cross-border, and cryptographically secured, providers and users on the network can be identified and subject to territorial legal obligations.173”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [173]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Blockchain effectively implements a decentralized security model, but this does not obviate the need for legal and regulatory involvement.

    “Blockchain effectively implements a decentralized security model, but this does not obviate the need for legal and regulatory involvement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The AML/KYC process can be onerous, especially for fast-moving and highly-computerized service providers.

    “The AML/KYC process, which typically requires financial services operators to verify physical identity documents such as passports and check against blacklists of individuals, can be onerous, especially for fast-moving and highly-computerized service providers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The FCC was sensitive to concerns about preemptive and over-expansive regulation dampening innovation.

    “The FCC was sensitive to concerns about preemptive and over-expansive regulation dampening innovation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [200]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Transacting with cryptocurrencies is not per se prohibited, though they are not necessarily accepted as valid within the regulated banking system or for other particular purposes.

    “That does not mean they are necessarily accepted as valid within the regulated banking system or for other particular purposes.It only means that transacting with cryptocurrencies in not per se prohibited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: No major Western government attempted to ban cryptocurrencies on the basis of illegal use, and most of the nations that did have since recognized the basic legitimacy of bitcoin and similar currencies.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The fact that bitcoin can be used to pay for drugs does not by itself raise legal problems for the cryptocurrency, because Russian rubles or bars of gold can be used similarly.

    “The fact that bitcoin can be used to pay for drugs does not by itself raise legal problems for the cryptocurrency; Russian rubles or bars of gold can do the same.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In others, where the blockchain is purely supplemental, existing legal arrangements function normally without any special integration.

    “In others, where the blockchain is purely supplemental, existing legal arrangements function normally without any special integration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The distributed ledger for orphan works would not take the place of standard copyright law, but it would extend it in a direction that it cannot easily go today.

    “The distributed ledger here would not take the place of standard copyright law, but it would extend it in a direction that it cannot easily go today.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The blockchain replaces the error-prone messaging structures between participants but does not seek to upend industry structure.

    “The blockchain replaces the error-prone messaging structures between participants but does not seek to upend industry structure.219”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [219]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Organizations do not just seek the least regulation; they seek the best regulation, among a slate of other factors.

    “Organizations do not just seek the least regulation; they seek the best regulation, among a slate of other factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A second class of applications involves situations where trust based on the legal system is breaking down or insufficient.

    “A second class of applications involves situations where trust based on the legal system is breaking down or insufficient.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Goldman Sachs estimates moving to distributed ledgers could reduce title insurance premiums in the United States and generate two to four billion dollars in cost savings, thanks to improved efficiency and reduced risk.

    “Goldman Sachs estimates moving to distributed ledgers could reduce title insurance premiums in the United States and generate two to four billion dollars in cost savings, thanks to improved efficiency and reduced risk.221”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [221]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Often the problem in the current environment is that centralized arrangements cannot scale effectively enough, preventing desirable solutions.

    “Often the problem in the current environment is that centralized arrangements cannot scale effectively enough, preventing desirable solutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If governed properly, blockchain-based solutions can overcome some of the limitations of legal enforcement, and vice versa.

    “If governed properly, blockchain-based solutions can overcome some of the limitations of legal enforcement, and vice versa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A reliable and stable regulatory environment will be important for building trust in blockchain platforms that seek a large user base.

    “A reliable and stable regulatory environment will be important for building trust in blockchain platforms that seek a large user base.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The supplementary mode is likely to be most comfortable for regulators and other government actors, because it does not ask them to change their roles or rules substantially.

    “It is likely to be most comfortable for regulators and other government actors, because it does not ask them to change their roles or rules substantially.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    U.S. dominance of the early Internet industry produced major benefits, both economic and in terms of global soft power.

    “U.S. dominance of the early Internet industry produced major benefits, both economic and in terms of global soft power.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The early leader in attracting blockchain activity is the canton of Zug, Switzerland, which combines a stable government, a central location in Europe, a welcoming environment for cryptocurrency companies, and very favorable tax policies.

    “The early leader is the canton of Zug, Switzerland, which combines a stable government, a central location in Europe, a welcoming environment for cryptocurrency companies, and very favorable tax policies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [210]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    One way for the blockchain to achieve more robust trust is through the legal system.

    “One way for the blockchain to achieve more robust trust is, perhaps surprisingly, through the legal system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In the United States, there are well-developed legal rules and established practices around real estate transactions.

    “For example, in the United States, there are well-developed legal rules and established practices around real estate transactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In many cases, affirmative steps must be taken to combine the best aspects of distributed ledgers and centralized law.

    “In many cases, however, affirmative steps must be taken to combine the best aspects of distributed ledgers and centralized law.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In supplementary mode, the risks are lower, but the benefits are concomitantly more limited.

    “The risks are lower, but the benefits are concomitantly more limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Whether code is superior or inferior to other modalities depends on the context.

    “Whether it is superior or inferior depends on the context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Singapore is a hotbed of blockchain activity, due in part to its permissive regulatory attitude.

    “Singapore is a hotbed of blockchain activity, due in part to its permissive regulatory attitude.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Countries ranging from tiny Gibraltar to Russia are creating new legal frameworks to attract blockchain startups, coin offerings, and other activity.

    “Hoping to be the Silicon Valley of the crypto economy, countries ranging from tiny Gibraltar to Russia are creating new legal frameworks to attract blockchain startups, coin offerings, and other activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    All companies today do not domicile in offshore tax havens for the same reasons.

    “These are the same reasons why all companies today do not domicile in offshore tax havens.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The equally simplistic view that regulators can and should direct these systems the way they manage centralized equivalents is equally misguided.

    “Yet the equally simplistic view that regulators can and should direct these systems the way they manage centralized equivalents is equally misguided.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Smart contracts could be used to ensure that those who use orphan works pay licensing fees to legitimate rights-holders who come forward.

    “Smart contracts could be used to ensure that those who use orphan works pay licensing fees to legitimate rights-holders who come forward (most likely vetted by an arbitration mechanism).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The risk of statutory damages for copyright infringement is a severe threat that scares away potential users of orphan works, even though in some cases the work might actually be in the public domain.

    “The risk of statutory damages for copyright infringement is a severe threat that scares away potential users of the material, even though in some cases it might actually be in the public domain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There are several mechanisms to hybridize the blockchain's distributed, algorithmic trust structures with the human-interpreted, state-backed institutions of law.

    “There are several mechanisms to hybridize the blockchain's distributed, algorithmic trust structures with the human-interpreted, state-backed institutions of law.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Title insurance is used to protect buyers against defects in land titles.

    “Title insurance is used to protect buyers against defects in land titles.220”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [220]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The Internet today is highly globalized, but in the 1990s, usage and startup creation were heavily centralized in the United States.

    “The Internet today is highly globalized, but in the 1990s, usage and startup creation were heavily centralized in the United States.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Corda is a project of the R3 financial industry consortium.

    “Another example is Corda, a project of the R3 financial industry consortium.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Systemic concerns about the technical viability of distributed ledgers remain relevant as trust considerations.

    “Systemic concerns about the technical viability of distributed ledgers remain relevant as trust considerations.222”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [222]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Regulators could even build compliance mechanisms directly into the system.

    “They could even build compliance mechanisms directly into the system.228”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [228]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Major Internet companies did not locate in Sealand or island tax havens; they went to where the developers and customers were.

    “It bears repeating that major Internet companies did not locate in Sealand or island tax havens; they went to where the developers and customers were.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The blockchain as a supplement to existing legal regimes can promote efficiency and reduce transaction costs, but is unlikely to transform industry structures or produce breakthrough innovations.

    “The blockchain as a supplement to existing legal regimes can promote efficiency and reduce transaction costs, but is unlikely to transform industry structures or produce breakthrough innovations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    A blockchain-based registry for orphan works would be available to all and would not give excessive gatekeeper power to any intermediary.

    “A blockchain-based registry would be available to all and would not give excessive gatekeeper power to any intermediary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Orphan works are in legal limbo.

    “Orphan works are thus in legal limbo.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Initiatives are underway to decentralize control over digital rights using distributed ledgers, giving power back to artists.

    “Initiatives are underway to decentralize control over digital rights using distributed ledgers, giving power back to artists, including Ujo Music, PeerTracks, and the Open Music Initiative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [233]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Those who wish to use orphan works, such as documentary filmmakers wishing to incorporate archival footage, cannot negotiate a license even if they wanted to.

    “Those who wish to use them, for example, documentary filmmakers wishing to incorporate archival footage, cannot negotiate a license even if they wanted to.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both the legal system and software code can undermine trust.

    “Both can also undermine it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The data structure for recording transactions in Corda is not a blockchain and does not use proof of work, although it employs a consensus-based distributed ledger with smart contracts.

    “The data structure for recording transactions is actually not a blockchain and does not use proof of work, although it employs a consensus-based distributed ledger with smart contracts. 225”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [225]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In some contexts, no legal involvement will be needed for blockchain.

    “In some contexts, no legal involvement will be needed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The SEC's investigative report on initial coin offerings and The DAO was widely praised as measured and technically knowledgeable.

    “The SEC's investigative report on initial coin offerings and The DAO was widely praised as measured and technically knowledgeable.215”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [215]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If there is to be a Lex Cryptographia, the salient challenge is to identify its strengths and weaknesses relative to those of traditional legal mechanisms.

    “If there is to be a Lex Cryptographia, therefore, the salient challenge is to identify its strengths and weaknesses, relative to those of traditional legal mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both the legal system and software code can promote trust.

    “Both the legal system and software code can promote trust.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The supplementary mode is the least ambitious mode of applying the blockchain and the least transformative.

    “This is the least ambitious mode of applying the blockchain and the least transformative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There is no certainty that the United States, or any jurisdiction, will strike the appropriate balance between flexibility and protection in its regulatory approaches to blockchain-based systems.

    “There is no certainty that the United States, or any jurisdiction, will strike the appropriate balance between flexibility and protection in its regulatory approaches to blockchain-based systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Regulators who do nothing will be a greater threat to the development of the market than those who engage in thoughtful and evolving efforts to address public policy considerations.

    “Overall, though, regulators who do nothing will be a greater threat to the development of the market than those who engage in thoughtful and evolving efforts to address public policy considerations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The CFTC created a LabCFTC group to study cryptocurrencies and engage with the nascent industry.

    “The CFTC created a LabCFTC group to study cryptocurrencies and engage with the nascent industry.214”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [214]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There are three primary ways the two systems can interact: blockchain as supplement, complement, or substitute.

    “There are three primary ways the two systems can interact: blockchain as supplement, complement, or substitute.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In contrast to the 'prohibit if not permitted' approach of New York's BitLicense, a sandbox model would encourage the kind of 'permissionless innovation' that was critical to the development of the Internet marketplace.

    “In contrast to the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [249]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Such scenarios are real, but they occupy a relatively small and shrinking portion of the distributed ledger landscape.

    “Such scenarios are real, but they occupy a relatively small and shrinking portion of the distributed ledger landscape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Thus, the two were definitely linked.

    “Thus, the two were definitely linked.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Embedding the distinction between possession and control in a legal safe harbor would remove uncertainty from the market and make the legal regime more consistent with technical realities.

    “Embedding the distinction between possession and control in a legal safe harbor would remove uncertainty from the market and make the legal regime more consistent with technical realities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Prior to Bitcoin, possessing money meant having the ability to do anything with it.
    • Rests on an assumption: An online service such as PayPal, where a user parks funds, has the power (absent legal or regulatory obligations) to steal it or send it to terrorists.
    • Rests on an assumption: On a blockchain, many actors such as miners, DApps, and wallet software providers touch the records of transactions, but without the private keys governing user accounts, they lack any such capabilities.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Several groups are building solutions using the mutual hashing of smart and legal contracts, including a subgroup of the R3 consortium led by the British bank Barclays, the Monax Burrow software now part of the Hyperledger open source project, and OpenLaw.

    “Several groups are building solutions using the mutual hashing of smart and legal contracts, including a subgroup of the R3 consortium led by the British bank Barclays, 263 the Monax Burrow software now part of the Hyperledger open source project, 264 and OpenLaw.265”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [263]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [264]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [265]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Grigg called this structure the Ricardian contract because it was developed for the Ricardo system.

    “Grigg called this structure the Ricardian contract because it was developed for the Ricardo system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [261]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Regulation of intermediaries such as registries may obviate the need to specify legal terms for every associated smart contract.

    “Regulation of intermediaries such as registries may obviate the need to specify legal terms for every associated smart contract.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The skills required of lawyers would have to change, with the field becoming more like legal engineering.

    “The skills required of lawyers would have to change, with the field becoming more like legal engineering.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [252]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    As blockchain-based systems become more familiar, a combination of customer, common law, and model legislation is likely to develop to address common situations.

    “As blockchain-based systems become more familiar, a combination of customer, common law, and model legislation is likely to develop to address common situations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Blockchain developers cannot ignore the law, but neither can governments disregard the growing significance of the blockchain.

    “Blockchain developers cannot ignore the law, but neither can governments disregard the growing significance of the blockchain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    One way to bridge the gap is for law to adapt.

    “One way to bridge the gap is for law to adapt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Legal code audits could also be implemented to ensure the contracts match the parties' intent, analogous to the security audits widely used by firms engaged in software development.

    “Legal code audits could also be implemented to ensure the contracts match the parties' intent, analogous to the security audits widely used by firms engaged in software development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [253]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A smart contract can be self-executing but not fully self-enforcing, thus avoiding the ambiguities and limitations of automated code-based enforcement.

    “In other words, a smart contract can be self-executing but not fully self-enforcing, thus avoiding the ambiguities and limitations of automated code-based enforcement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    With this approach, the human and smart contracts explicitly reference one another through digital signatures.

    “With this approach, the human and smart contracts explicitly reference one another through digital signatures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In contrast to The DAO terms of service, which privileged the algorithmic contract over the human-readable explanations, this approach makes each dependent on the other.

    “In contrast to The DAO terms of service, which privileged the algorithmic contract over the human-readable explanations, this approach makes each dependent on the other.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    To make this contract drafting process more analogous to the formalized coding that goes into a smart contract, the contractual clauses can be represented as components that are assembled into a digital document using a markup language.

    “To make this contract drafting process more analogous to the formalized coding that goes into a smart contract, the contractual clauses can be represented as components that are assembled into a digital document using a markup language.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Private law can be made more code-like as well.

    “Private law can be made more code-like as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The simplest way to make blockchain-based systems more consistent with legal enforcement is literally to connect the two.

    “The simplest way to make blockchain-based systems more consistent with legal enforcement is literally to connect the two.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    As with the contract system today, forms will be widespread for business-to-consumer and low-value agreements.

    “As with the contract system today, forms will be widespread for business-to-consumer and low-value agreements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisecitation

    Such 'operational' aspects are the kind that can often be automated in smart contracts.

    “Such”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [251]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In many cases, the costs of dispute resolution will so far exceed the potential recovery that 'quick-anddirty' reliance on the naïve actions of machines will be sufficient.

    “In many cases, the costs of dispute resolution will so far exceed the potential recovery that”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Even if artists have the technical capacity to control their output, they may not have the practical ability to do without the marketing and distribution power of the music industry.

    “Even if artists have the technical capacity to control their output, they may not have the practical ability to do without the marketing and distribution power of the music industry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Distributed ledger systems can become more hospitable to legal enforcement.

    “Just as regulators and lawyers can adapt to the blockchain environment, distributed ledger systems can become more hospitable to legal enforcement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In parallel, the smart contract included the cryptographic hash string of the legal contract text.

    “In parallel, the smart contract included the cryptographic hash string of the legal contract text.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [260]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Contractual integration links the substantive terms of a legal agreement with those of a smart contract.

    “Contractual integration links the substantive terms of a legal agreement with those of a smart contract.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The alternative approach is to pair smart contracts and legal contracts explicitly.

    “The alternative approach is to pair smart contracts and legal contracts explicitly.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Information security expert Ian Grigg first explored this idea in 2004, before the advent of cryptocurrencies, as part of the Ricardo digital transaction platform for financial instruments.

    “Information security expert Ian Grigg first explored this idea in 2004, before the advent of cryptocurrencies, as part of the Ricardo digital transaction platform for financial instruments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [260]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The legal code included the cryptographic hash string of the computer code, which guaranteed that it was referencing the proper smart contract.

    “The legal code included the cryptographic hash string of the computer code, which guaranteed that it was referencing the proper smart contract.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [260]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    When firms can take sufficient steps to police themselves, the safe harbor incentivizes them to do so.

    “When firms can take sufficient steps to police themselves, the safe harbor incentivizes them to do so.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Coin Center has proposed a new safe harbor for blockchain-based startups.

    “Based on this history, Coin Center has proposed a new safe harbor for blockchain-based startups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [246]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For that reason, the initiatives likely to move forward first are in relatively stable countries such as Georgia, and very stable ones such as Sweden, even though the need might be greater in the developing world.

    “For that reason, the initiatives likely to move forward first are in relatively stable countries such as Georgia, and very stable ones such as Sweden, even though the need might be greater in the developing world.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There may need to be mappings between the apparatus of legal enforcement and the technical framework of distributed ledgers.

    “As a result, there may need to be mappings between the apparatus of legal enforcement and the technical framework of distributed ledgers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Well-designed sandboxes can make it easier for startups to write that running code and give regulators visibility to understand the public policy concerns that may arise.

    “Welldesigned sandboxes can make it easier for startups to write that running code and give regulators visibility to understand the public policy concerns that may arise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The three main pathways being explored are to integrate the terms of legal and smart contracts, to integrate traditional legal enforcement mechanisms into smart contracts, and to integrate law-like governance processes into blockchain platforms.

    “The three main pathways being explored are to integrate the terms of legal and smart contracts, to integrate traditional legal enforcement mechanisms into smart contracts, and to integrate law-like governance processes into blockchain platforms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    These blockchain-based solutions leave conventional law in place but extend it to new applications that are untenable through existing trust architectures.

    “As with the supplemental applications, these blockchain-based solutions leave conventional law (in this case, the copyright system) in place.However, they extend it to new applications that are untenable through existing trust architectures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Communities will use the blockchain to substitute for law when their goal is to evade legal responsibilities.

    “And of course, communities will use the blockchain to substitute for law when their goal is to evade legal responsibilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A sandbox can be constructed to apply to organizations at early stages of development and disappear when they mature.

    “A sandbox can be constructed to apply to organizations at early stages of development and disappear when they mature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A different approach is to take some aspects of enforcement out of the automated system of the smart contract.

    “A different approach is to take some aspects of enforcement out of the automated system of the smart contract.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Like Szabo's original notion of smart contracts, Ricardian contracts were largely a theoretical construct prior to the blockchain, and in particular, Ethereum's successful implementation of blockchain smart contracts.

    “Like Szabo's original notion of smart contracts, Ricardian contracts were largely a theoretical construct prior to the blockchain, and in particular, Ethereum's successful implementation of blockchain smart contracts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [262]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    By standardizing and reviewing the elements of the smart contract ahead of time, such mechanisms should cut down on the errors that led to failures such as The DAO hack.

    “By standardizing and reviewing the elements of the smart contract ahead of time, such mechanisms should cut down on the errors that led to failures such as The DAO hack.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is no reason that the two mechanisms cannot coexist.

    “There is no reason, however, that the two mechanisms cannot coexist.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Ricardo defined its contracts as having three components: legal code, computer code, and parameters.

    “Ricardo defined its contracts as having three components: legal code (the human-readable text of a contract), computer code (the executable steps of s smart contract), and parameters (the variables that influence how the computer code executes).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [260]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Every smart contract will not require a bespoke human-negotiated contract alongside it.

    “Every smart contract will not require a bespoke human-negotiated contract alongside it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These ventures still face the challenge of entrenched power dynamics.

    “These ventures still face the challenge of entrenched power dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    They could be used to create a regular outlet for private dispute resolution, the way so many business-to-consumer form contracts today push disputes into arbitration.

    “Or they could be used to create a regular outlet for private dispute resolution, the way so many business-to-consumer form contracts today push disputes into arbitration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Any governance structures that are imperfect will eventually need to be modified by someone.

    “Any governance structures that are imperfect will eventually need to be modified by someone.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Computational courts, or computational juries, are under development today in some blockchain-based projects.

    “Even more speculative-yet under development today in some blockchain-based projects-are computational courts, or as they are sometimes called, computational juries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [276]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While BIP 9 thus enables a crude voting mechanism for controversial Bitcoin protocol upgrades, it leaves much to be desired as onchain governance.

    “While BIP 9 thus enables a crude voting mechanism for controversial Bitcoin protocol upgrades, it leaves much to be desired as onchain governance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Andreas Antonopoulos and Pamela Morgan proposed a decentralized arbitration and mediation network (DAMN) in 2016.

    “Andreas Antonopoulos and Pamela Morgan proposed a decentralized arbitration and mediation network (DAMN) in 2016.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [275]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    They may operate more like industry standards bodies or open source projects, where rule changes occur through collective agreement rather than the hierarchical edicts of corporate management.

    “They may operate more like industry standards bodies or open source projects, where rule changes occur through collective agreement rather than the hierarchical edicts of corporate management.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Augur proposes to address unethical markets through the same reporting process it uses to verify outcomes of predictions.

    “Augur proposes to address such unethical markets through the same reporting process it uses to verify outcomes of predictions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [277]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: One reason real-money prediction markets such as Intrade have been shut down by regulators is that they can be used in illegal or unethical ways.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Systems that have well-structured mechanisms for considering and implementing changes to consensus rules or other technical attributes are not fundamentally decentralized.

    “Systems that have well-structured mechanisms for considering and implementing changes to consensus rules or other technical attributes are not fundamentally decentralized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    This would help address extraordinary cases such as The DAO attack.

    “This would help address extraordinary cases such as The DAO attack.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Humans need to define the rule changes that network participants vote on, and code the software to implement them if adopted.

    “Moreover, humans need to define the rule changes that network participants vote on, and code the software to implement them if adopted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    On Augur, those reporters must also post a bond.

    “Those reporters must also post a bond.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [277]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The thresholds for approval are arbitrary.

    “The thresholds for approval are arbitrary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    They could be designed to operate only in extreme cases, with high barriers through the design of the multisignature (or 'multisig') process.

    “They could be designed to operate only in extreme cases, with high barriers through the design of the multisignature (or”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Agreement does not necessarily presume trust; even non-communicating parties may converge on common points by independently choosing the most likely or familiar option.

    “Agreement does not necessarily presume trust. An insight of game theory is that even non-communicating parties may converge on common points by independently choosing the most likely or familiar option.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] 23. THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 54- 55 (1960). The creators of both smart contracts and Ethereum make reference to these Schelling Points. See Szabo, Public Networks, supra note 85;

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Further growth will depend partly on technical advances, partly on adoption patterns, partly on the business innovations built on top of distributed ledger platforms, and partly on resolution of the governance challenges to the blockchain's trust architecture.

    “Further growth will depend partly on technical advances, partly on adoption patterns, partly on the business innovations built on top of distributed ledger platforms, and partly on resolution of the governance challenges to the blockchain's trust architecture.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    At a time when trust in centralized power structures is waning, the blockchain's 'trustless trust' offers a compelling alternative.

    “At a time when trust in centralized power structures is waning, the blockchain's”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The on-chain governance systems make the blockchains operate more like a human-based legal or governance regime, but they still leave gaps that traditional institutions must fill.

    “The on-chain governance systems make the blockchains operate more like a human-based legal or governance regime, but they still leave gaps that traditional institutions must fill.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Like the Internet, the blockchain is a foundational technology, whose impacts could reach into every corner of the world.

    “Like the Internet, the blockchain is a foundational technology, 285 whose impacts could reach into every corner of the world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [285]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Blockchain arbitration systems would differ from any current example because decisions could be directly executed on the blockchain and apply on a peer-to-peer basis.

    “decisions could, in some cases, be directly executed on the blockchain and would apply on a peer-to-peer basis, blockchain arbitration systems would be different than any current example.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Smart contracts could by default incorporate arbitration mechanisms or rollback provisions.

    “Smart contracts could by default incorporate arbitration mechanisms or rollback provisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    On Augur, when someone creates a contract, they post a bond in Rep.

    “When someone creates a contract, such as a prediction that the President will be impeached within a certain period of time, they post a bond in Rep.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [277]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    To move forward, law and distributed ledgers need each other.

    “To move forward, though, law and distributed ledgers need each other.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tezos, which raised $200 million in one of the largest initial coin offerings, has generated tremendous interest for its governance approach.

    “Tezos, which raised $200 million in one of the largest initial coin offerings, has generated tremendous interest for its governance approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [283]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Prediction markets can produce highly accurate forecasts by aggregating the wisdom of the crowd based on financial incentives.

    “Prediction markets can produce highly accurate forecasts by aggregating the wisdom of the crowd based on financial incentives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] 26. Kenneth J. Arrow et al., The Promise of Prediction Markets, 320 SCIENCE 877 (2008). 180. TAPSCOTT & TAPSCOTT, supra note 43, at 84. 183. See Jeff John Roberts, Companies Can Put Shareholders on a Blockchain Starting Today, FORTUNE (Aug. 1, 2017), http://fortune.com/2017/08/01/blockchain-shareholders-law/ [https://perma.cc/D89K-MJMH]. 184. See Stan Higgins, Arizona Governor Signs Blockchain Bill into Law, COINDESK (Mar. 31, 2017), https://www.coindesk.com/arizona-governor-signs-blockchain-bill-law/ [https://perma.cc/T2JJ-RMAJ]. 185. See Vermont State to Recognize Blockchain Data in the Cour source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some oracles are just traditional data feeds designed with interfaces for smart contracts to process them in an automated way.

    “Some oracles are just traditional data feeds designed with interfaces for smart contracts to process them in an automated way.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Just as the Federal Arbitration Act directs courts to accept private arbitration decisions when fraud is not involved, legislation could create similar legal force for appropriately designed blockchain dispute resolution systems.

    “Furthermore, just as the Federal Arbitration Act directs courts to accept private arbitration decisions when fraud is not involved, legislation could create similar legal force for appropriately designed blockchain dispute resolution systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [278]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Wikipedia is a great example of how a novel organizational approach combined with massive user participation can transform a market.

    “Wikipedia is a great example of how a novel organizational approach combined with massive user participation can transform a market.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [279]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Computational courts employ the wisdom of the crowd through prediction markets instead of arbitrators resolving disputes.

    “Instead of arbitrators resolving disputes, these mechanisms employ the wisdom of the crowd through prediction markets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [276]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There are several efforts underway to create true on-chain governance.

    “There are several efforts underway to create true on-chain governance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Any of these voluntary mechanisms could be baked into blockchain applications, or even in some cases legally mandated.

    “Any of these voluntary mechanisms could be baked into blockchain applications, or even in some cases legally mandated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Augur process is designed to produce verified outcomes without having to trust a specific central authority.

    “This process is designed to produce verified outcomes without having to trust a specific central authority.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Too much law could stifle the blockchain or drive it underground, yet so could too little law.

    “Too much law could stifle the blockchain or drive it underground, yet so could too little law.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    As Wright and De Filippi point out, oracles could be extended to dispute resolution by courts or private actors.

    “As Wright and De Filippi point out, oracles could be extended to dispute resolution by courts or private actors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [270]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    New international arbitration networks might need to be developed that were tuned to the needs of blockchain disputes, much as the World Intellectual Property Organization created the Uniform Dispute Resolution Process (UDRP) to handle trademark disputes over Internet domain names.

    “For example, new international arbitration networks might need to be developed that were tuned to the needs of blockchain disputes, much as the World Intellectual Property Organization created the Uniform Dispute Resolution Process (UDRP) to handle trademark disputes over Internet domain names.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [273]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The full range of incentives and governance mechanisms could be used to encourage compliance with desirable approaches.

    “The full range of incentives and governance mechanisms could be used to encourage compliance with desirable approaches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Decred successfully executed a change to its algorithm for allocating these voting tokens using the governance mechanism in Spring 2017.

    “Decred successfully executed a change to its algorithm for allocating these voting tokens using the governance mechanism in Spring 2017.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [282]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    A project called Rootstock is trying to create a smart contracts layer on top of Bitcoin, with a built-in process giving both miners and users power to make binding votes on network changes.

    “A project called Rootstock is trying to create a smart contracts layer on top of Bitcoin, with a built-in process giving both miners and users power to make binding votes on network changes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A call option to buy a security at a certain price can be executed algorithmically on the blockchain, with payment in bitcoin or another cryptocurrency.

    “For example, a call option to buy a security at a certain price can be executed algorithmically on the blockchain, with payment in bitcoin or another cryptocurrency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The distributed nature of the blockchain may call for new enforcement mechanisms that are themselves distributed.

    “The distributed nature of the blockchain may call for new enforcement mechanisms that are themselves distributed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [272]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Thomson Reuters, one of the largest business publishing firms, is making some of its data feeds available in a manner designed to function as smart contract oracles.

    “Thomson Reuters, one of the largest business publishing firms, is making some of its data feeds available in a manner designed to function as smart contract oracles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [268]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Distributed ledgers are the first foundational technology in twenty years whose potential impact matches that of the Internet.

    “Distributed ledgers are the first foundational technology in twenty years whose potential impact matches that of the Internet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    On Augur, participants win additional Rep if the prediction is correct and lose the bond if incorrect.

    “They win additional Rep if the prediction is correct and lose the bond if incorrect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [277]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    To be truly transformative, these systems would have to evolve their governance using the same decentralized approach they use to enforce it.

    “To be truly transformative, these systems would have to evolve their governance using the same decentralized approach they use to enforce it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    On Augur, the reports can be challenged, and if a second randomly selected jury agrees with the challenge, the reporter providing incorrect information loses her bond.

    “The reports can be challenged, and if a second randomly selected jury agrees with the challenge, the reporter providing incorrect information loses her bond.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [277]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    On Augur, a randomly selected group of reporters (analogous to a jury) are tasked with verifying the outcome.

    “A randomly selected group of reporters (analogous to a jury) are tasked with verifying the outcome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [277]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There are limitations to these systems.

    “There are limitations to these systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Augur uses a system in which participants in the marketplace purchase a token called Rep.

    “Augur uses a system in which participants in the marketplace purchase a token called Rep.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [277]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This system mimics a legal arbitration process.

    “This system mimics a legal arbitration process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Augur Ethereum-based prediction market is developing this approach internally.

    “The Augur Ethereum-based prediction market is developing this approach internally.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [277]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

237 of 237
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A majority of miners in the Bitcoin network are honest.

    “Even if some of them are untrustworthy, the system holds so long as the majority is honest.67”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Bitcoin is designed to be censorship- and tamper-resistant.

    “Bitcoin is also designed to be censorshipand tamper-resistant.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Once a transaction is recorded on the Bitcoin blockchain, it cannot easily be changed.

    “And once a transaction is recorded, it cannot easily be changed, a property known as immutability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Proof of work is expensive, requiring specialized computing hardware and large quantities of electricity.

    “Proof of work is expensive, literally.It requires specialized computing hardware and large quantities of electricity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Miners will not be incentivized sufficiently out of altruism.

    “Miners will not be incentivized sufficiently out of altruism.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Distributed ledgers are active, not passive; they must ensure that recorded transactions are actually completed to match the consensus.

    “Distributed ledgers are active, not passive.In other words, they do not simply record information passed to them.They are part of a consensus system, so they must ensure that recorded transactions are actually completed to match the consensus.83”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All intermediaries impose costs.

    “Moreover, all intermediaries impose costs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Intermediaries shape markets to serve their own interests.

    “Intermediaries also shape markets to serve their own interests.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Trust is not transitive.

    “Trust is not transitive.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Bitcoin and other blockchain-based systems face significant scaling challenges.

    “Bitcoin and other blockchain-based systems do face significant scaling challenges.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Bitcoin consensus ledger has not been successfully hacked since its very early days.

    “The Bitcoin consensus ledger has not been successfully hacked since its very early days.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sophisticated attackers have tried to hack the Bitcoin consensus ledger.

    “Sophisticated attackers have tried.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There have been significant bugs discovered in the open source Bitcoin code, although they were addressed prior to any lasting damage.

    “There have been significant bugs discovered in the open source Bitcoin code, although they were addressed prior to any lasting damage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The blockchain world has attracted some of the world's foremost experts in cryptography, who are working actively to prevent such failures.

    “And the blockchain world has attracted some of the world's foremost experts in cryptography, who are working actively to prevent such failures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Token purchasers today are generally contributing money to blockchain-based projects with virtually no way to guarantee they get anything in return, and very limited information about risks.

    “Token purchasers today are generally contributing money to blockchain-based projects with virtually no way to guarantee they get anything in return, and very limited information about risks.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Augur developers do not control what questions can be posted on the prediction market.

    “The Augur developers do not control what questions can be posted on the prediction market.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    On a distributed platform such as Augur, administrators cannot delete illegal, offensive, or harassing material that users post, unlike on Facebook or Reddit.

    “On Facebook or Reddit, administrators have the ability to delete illegal, offensive, or harassing material that users post.Not so on a distributed platform such as Augur.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No major Western government attempted to ban cryptocurrencies on the basis of illegal use, and most of the nations that did have since recognized the basic legitimacy of bitcoin and similar currencies.

    “Contrary to fears, no major Western government attempted to ban cryptocurrencies on this basis, and most of the nations that did have since recognized the basic legitimacy of bitcoin and similar currencies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Billions of dollars of derivatives trades are executed each day with no human intervention.

    “Billions of dollars of derivatives trades are executed each day with no human intervention.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The only difference between the attacker who tried to steal The DAO funds and the miners who took it back through the hard fork was their motivations.

    “The only difference between the attacker who tried to steal the funds and the miners who took it back through the hard fork was their motivations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cross-border contractual disputes are a staple of modern business among multi-national firms.

    “On the latter concern, cross-border contractual disputes are a staple of modern business among multi-national firms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most people do not buy drugs online and pay to access streaming media services.

    “Most people do not buy drugs online and pay to access streaming media services.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Criminals and terrorists will try to exploit the blockchain, just as they exploit other technologies whenever possible.

    “Criminals and terrorists will try to exploit the blockchain, just as they exploit other technologies whenever possible.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Governments will overreact and propose rules with collateral damage to legitimate operations.

    “Governments will overreact and propose rules with collateral damage to legitimate operations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Silk Road takedown showed that the blockchain is not an impermeable shield against legal enforcement.

    “The Silk Road takedown showed that the blockchain is not an impermeable shield against legal enforcement, and the DAO attack showed the governance limitations of purely algorithmic systems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The DAO attack showed the governance limitations of purely algorithmic systems.

    “The Silk Road takedown showed that the blockchain is not an impermeable shield against legal enforcement, and the DAO attack showed the governance limitations of purely algorithmic systems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Today, digital rights management systems are controlled by intermediaries and distributors, not the creators themselves.

    “Today, digital rights management systems are controlled by intermediaries and distributors, not the creators themselves.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many artists have difficulty receiving sufficient compensation.

    “As a result, many artists have difficulty receiving sufficient compensation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Several billion people in the developing world lack access to bank accounts and the opportunities for easy payments and credit they bring.

    “Several billion people in the developing world, for example, lack access to bank accounts and the opportunities for easy payments and credit they bring.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In many parts of the world, land title records are incomplete and challenging for ordinary citizens to interact with.

    “In many parts of the world, land title records are incomplete and challenging for ordinary citizens to interact with.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Prior to Bitcoin, possessing money meant having the ability to do anything with it.

    “Prior to Bitcoin, possessing money meant having the ability to do anything with it.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    An online service such as PayPal, where a user parks funds, has the power (absent legal or regulatory obligations) to steal it or send it to terrorists.

    “An online service such as PayPal, where a user parks funds, has the power (absent legal or regulatory obligations) to steal it or send it to terrorists.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    On a blockchain, many actors such as miners, DApps, and wallet software providers touch the records of transactions, but without the private keys governing user accounts, they lack any such capabilities.

    “On a blockchain, by contrast, many actors such as miners, DApps, and wallet software providers touch the records of transactions, but without the private keys governing user accounts, they lack any such capabilities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most business contracts are essentially modules that lawyers string together and customize.

    “Most business contracts are essentially modules that lawyers string together and customize.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Smart contracts are good at setting forth anticipated conditions and consequences ex ante, and then ensuring the consequences occur upon fulfillment of the conditions.

    “Smart contracts are good at setting forth anticipated conditions and consequences ex ante, and then ensuring the consequences occur upon fulfillment of the conditions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Legal contracts are good at cleaning up the mess when, inevitably, things do not go according to plan.

    “Legal contracts are good at cleaning up the mess when, inevitably, things do not go according to plan.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The blockchain does not know stock prices.

    “The blockchain, however, does not know stock prices.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    One of the biggest problems with blockchain networks as governance institutions is that it is difficult to change their foundational rules.

    “One of the biggest problems with blockchain networks as governance institutions is that it is difficult to change their foundational rules.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    These are still early days for the blockchain.

    “These are still early days for the blockchain.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    One reason real-money prediction markets such as Intrade have been shut down by regulators is that they can be used in illegal or unethical ways.

    “One reason real-money prediction markets such as Intrade have been shut down by regulators is that they can be used in illegal or unethical ways.”
40 of 40

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting estimates of computing power needed for a 51% attack

    Minor

    The paper says the Bitcoin network has thousands of times the computing power of the 500 fastest supercomputers combined. Controlling more than half of that network would therefore require far more than the computing power of several hundred such machines, contrary to its later estimate.

1 of 1

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [9]9. Trevor I. Kiviat, Beyond Bitcoin: Issues in Regulating Blockchain Transactions, 65
  2. [22]22. see generally, Swanson, supra note 85 at 4-5. 121. See Richard Gendal Brown, Towards Deeper Collaboration in Distributed Ledgers: Thoughts on Digital Asset's Global Synchronisation Log, GENDAL.ME (Jan. 24, 2017), https://gendal.me/2017/01/24/towards-deeper-collaboration-in-distributed-ledgers -thoughts-on-digital-assets-global-synchronisation-log/ [https://perma.cc/Q9BP-V8K2]. 122. Vlad Zamfir (@VladZamfir), TWITTER (Mar. 4, 2017, 4:40 AM), https://twitter.com/vladzamfir/status/838006311598030848?lang=en [https://perma.cc/Z94J-VNDB]. Zamfir felt the need to explain himself the next day in a longer post. See Vlad Zamfir, About My Tweet from Yesterday.., MEDIUM (Mar. 5, 2017), https://medium.com/@Vlad_Zamfir/about-my-tweet-from-yesterday-dcc61915b572 [https://perma.cc/P6BL-ECND]. 123. Agreement does not necessarily presume trust. An insight of game theory is that even non-communicating parties may converge on common points by independently choosing the most likely or familiar option. See
  3. [24]24. Vitalik Buterin, SchellingCoin: A Minimal-Trust Universal Data Feed, ETHEREUM BLOG (Mar. 28, 2014), https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/03/28/schellingcoin-a-minimal-trust-universal-data-feed/ [https://perma.cc/ZHA6-WSH9]. 145. See Robin Sidel, Eleanor Warnock & Takashi Mochizuki, Almost Half a Billion Worth of Bitcoins Vanish, WALL ST. J. (Feb. 28, 2014) https://www.wsj.com/articles/mt-gox-to-hold -news-conference-1393579356 [https://perma.cc/C8E5-AG7A];
  4. [29]29. FED. COMM. L.J. 203, 207 (2013). 200. See id. at 231. 201. See Camila Russo, Ethereum Co-Founder Says Crypto Coin Market Is a Time-Bomb, BLOOMBERG (July 18, 2017), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07 -18/ethereum-co-founder-says-crypto-coin-market-is-ticking-time-bomb [https://perma.cc/H3ZB-6CPC] (quoting Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, stating that, "If it talks like a duck and walks like a duck, the SEC will say it's a duck."). 202. See Sarah Todd, Fincen Fines Ripple Labs Over AML, Says Firm 'Enhancing' Protocol, AM.
  5. [35]35. WAKE FOREST L. REV. 345, 359 (2014). 244. See, e.g., Derek Khanna, The Law that Gave Us the Modern Internet-and the Campaign to
  6. [40]40. LEGALESE, http://legalese.com [https://perma.cc/2TUM-7SXM] (last visited Sept. 2, 2018). 258. See INT'L SWAPS & DERIVATIVES ASS'N., The Future of Derivatives Processing and Market Infrastructure [hereinafter ISDA WHITE PAPER] (Sept. 2016), at 15, https://www2.isda.org/attachment/ODcwMA==/Infrastructure%20white%20paper.pdf [https://perma.cc/KE4P-BZDS]. 259. See Werbach & Cornell, supra note 25, at 318. 260. See generally Ian Grigg, The Ricardian Contract, in PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST IEEE WORKSHOP ON ELECTRONIC CONTRACTING 25 (2004). 261. See id. at 25. 262. The Ricardo platform that Grigg was building never took off. 263. See Clack et al., supra note 251, at 12;

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Werbach, K.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Werbach, Kevin
Venue
Berkeley Technology Law Journal
Publisher
Berkeley Technology Law Journal
Published
2018
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
487
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125186743
Cited by
235
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Berkeley technology law journal
  • UC Berkeley
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
blockchain, trust, blockchain regulation, blockchain governance, Bitcoin, legal enforcement, innovation and regulation, public policy, law and technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review